Comparative study on phase and properties between rPET/PS and LCP/PS in situ microfibrillar-reinforced composites

Microfibrillar-reinforced composites based on two dispersed phases, liquid crystalline polymer (LCP) and recycled poly(ethylene terephthalate) (rPET), and polystyrene (PS) were prepared using extrusion process. The rheological behavior, morphology, and thermal stability of LCP/PS and rPET/PS blends...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sunan Saikrasun, Panpirada Limpisawasdi, Taweechai Amornsakchai
Other Authors: Mahasarakham University
Format: Article
Published: 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/27413
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Mahidol University
id th-mahidol.27413
record_format dspace
spelling th-mahidol.274132018-09-13T13:46:03Z Comparative study on phase and properties between rPET/PS and LCP/PS in situ microfibrillar-reinforced composites Sunan Saikrasun Panpirada Limpisawasdi Taweechai Amornsakchai Mahasarakham University Mahidol University Chemistry Materials Science Microfibrillar-reinforced composites based on two dispersed phases, liquid crystalline polymer (LCP) and recycled poly(ethylene terephthalate) (rPET), and polystyrene (PS) were prepared using extrusion process. The rheological behavior, morphology, and thermal stability of LCP/PS and rPET/PS blends containing various dispersed phase contents were investigated. All blends and LCP exhibited shear thinning behavior, whereas Newtonian fluid behavior was observed for rPET. The incorporation of both LCP and rPET into PS significantly improved the processability. The potential of rPET as a processing lubricant by bringing down the melt viscosity of the blend system was as good as LCP. The elongated LCP domains were clearly observed in as-extruded strand. Although the viscosity ratio of rPET/PS system was lower than that of LCP/PS system, most rPET domains appeared as small droplets. An addition of LCP and rPET into PS matrix improved the thermal resistance in air significantly. The obtained results suggested the high potential of rPET as a processing aid and thermally stable reinforcing-material similar to LCP. The mechanical properties of the LCP-containing blends were mostly higher than those of the corresponding rPET-containing blends when compared at the same blend composition. © 2008 Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2018-09-13T06:31:08Z 2018-09-13T06:31:08Z 2009-07-01 Article Journal of Polymer Research. Vol.16, No.4 (2009), 443-454 10.1007/s10965-008-9247-6 10229760 2-s2.0-67651011738 https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/27413 Mahidol University SCOPUS https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=67651011738&origin=inward
institution Mahidol University
building Mahidol University Library
continent Asia
country Thailand
Thailand
content_provider Mahidol University Library
collection Mahidol University Institutional Repository
topic Chemistry
Materials Science
spellingShingle Chemistry
Materials Science
Sunan Saikrasun
Panpirada Limpisawasdi
Taweechai Amornsakchai
Comparative study on phase and properties between rPET/PS and LCP/PS in situ microfibrillar-reinforced composites
description Microfibrillar-reinforced composites based on two dispersed phases, liquid crystalline polymer (LCP) and recycled poly(ethylene terephthalate) (rPET), and polystyrene (PS) were prepared using extrusion process. The rheological behavior, morphology, and thermal stability of LCP/PS and rPET/PS blends containing various dispersed phase contents were investigated. All blends and LCP exhibited shear thinning behavior, whereas Newtonian fluid behavior was observed for rPET. The incorporation of both LCP and rPET into PS significantly improved the processability. The potential of rPET as a processing lubricant by bringing down the melt viscosity of the blend system was as good as LCP. The elongated LCP domains were clearly observed in as-extruded strand. Although the viscosity ratio of rPET/PS system was lower than that of LCP/PS system, most rPET domains appeared as small droplets. An addition of LCP and rPET into PS matrix improved the thermal resistance in air significantly. The obtained results suggested the high potential of rPET as a processing aid and thermally stable reinforcing-material similar to LCP. The mechanical properties of the LCP-containing blends were mostly higher than those of the corresponding rPET-containing blends when compared at the same blend composition. © 2008 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
author2 Mahasarakham University
author_facet Mahasarakham University
Sunan Saikrasun
Panpirada Limpisawasdi
Taweechai Amornsakchai
format Article
author Sunan Saikrasun
Panpirada Limpisawasdi
Taweechai Amornsakchai
author_sort Sunan Saikrasun
title Comparative study on phase and properties between rPET/PS and LCP/PS in situ microfibrillar-reinforced composites
title_short Comparative study on phase and properties between rPET/PS and LCP/PS in situ microfibrillar-reinforced composites
title_full Comparative study on phase and properties between rPET/PS and LCP/PS in situ microfibrillar-reinforced composites
title_fullStr Comparative study on phase and properties between rPET/PS and LCP/PS in situ microfibrillar-reinforced composites
title_full_unstemmed Comparative study on phase and properties between rPET/PS and LCP/PS in situ microfibrillar-reinforced composites
title_sort comparative study on phase and properties between rpet/ps and lcp/ps in situ microfibrillar-reinforced composites
publishDate 2018
url https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/27413
_version_ 1763490147554295808