Experience of intravenous sedation for pediatric gastrointestinal endoscopy in a large tertiary referral center in a developing country

Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy of intravenous sedation for pediatric gastrointestinal endoscopy (GIE) at a tertiary care teaching hospital in a developing country. Methods: We undertook a retrospective review of the sedation service records of pediatric patie...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Somchai Amornyotin, Prapun Aanpreung, Ungkab Prakarnrattana, Wiyada Chalayonnavin, Sukanda Chatchawankitkul, Wichit Srikureja
Other Authors: Mahidol University
Format: Article
Published: 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/27984
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Mahidol University
id th-mahidol.27984
record_format dspace
spelling th-mahidol.279842018-09-13T13:57:02Z Experience of intravenous sedation for pediatric gastrointestinal endoscopy in a large tertiary referral center in a developing country Somchai Amornyotin Prapun Aanpreung Ungkab Prakarnrattana Wiyada Chalayonnavin Sukanda Chatchawankitkul Wichit Srikureja Mahidol University Medicine Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy of intravenous sedation for pediatric gastrointestinal endoscopy (GIE) at a tertiary care teaching hospital in a developing country. Methods: We undertook a retrospective review of the sedation service records of pediatric patients who underwent GIE. All endoscopies were performed by a pediatric gastroenterologist. All of the sedation was administered by staff anesthesiologist or anesthetic personnel in the gastroenterology procedure room. Results: Sedation was provided for 222 procedures in 214 patients ranged in age from younger than 1 to 17 years and in weight from 2.7 to 80.0 kg. Intravenous sedation was provided in 176 patients (82.2%). Of these patients, 185 procedures were performed and reviewed, with 152 (82.2%) procedures were esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) alone, 14 (7.6%) procedures were colonoscopy alone, 18 (9.7%) procedures were EGD and colonoscopy, and one procedure was endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS). Most common indications of the procedure were screening for esophageal varices (25.2%), abdominal pain (15.9%), history of upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage (13.6%), and unexplained anemia (10.3%). The majority of preanesthetic problems were hematologic disease, anemia (38.2%); liver disease, cirrhosis (13.5%); and electrolyte imbalance (13.5%). Propofol (94.0%), fentanyl (87.0%), and midazolam (67.8%) were frequently used. The mean dose of propofol was 7.8 ± 4.1 mg·kg-1·h-1, fentanyl 2.3 ± 1.1 mcg·kg-1·h-1, and midazolam 0.1 ± 0.1 mg·kg-1·h-1. Most of them were used in combination. The combination of propofol, fentanyl, and midazolam was commonly employed (46.4%). The mean sedation time of all procedures was 28.2 min and was different according to procedure type. Complications occurred infrequently (13.5%) and were medication or airway related. All complications were easily treated, with no adverse sequelae. Intravenous sedation was successful except for one patient who required general anesthesia. However, all procedures were completed successfully. Conclusions: In the setting of the developing country, intravenous sedation for pediatric GIE by trained anesthetic personnel with appropriate monitoring was safe and effective. Serious adverse events were rare in our population. © 2009 Blackwell Publishing Ltd. 2018-09-13T06:57:02Z 2018-09-13T06:57:02Z 2009-08-01 Article Paediatric Anaesthesia. Vol.19, No.8 (2009), 784-791 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2009.03063.x 14609592 11555645 2-s2.0-67651219261 https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/27984 Mahidol University SCOPUS https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=67651219261&origin=inward
institution Mahidol University
building Mahidol University Library
continent Asia
country Thailand
Thailand
content_provider Mahidol University Library
collection Mahidol University Institutional Repository
topic Medicine
spellingShingle Medicine
Somchai Amornyotin
Prapun Aanpreung
Ungkab Prakarnrattana
Wiyada Chalayonnavin
Sukanda Chatchawankitkul
Wichit Srikureja
Experience of intravenous sedation for pediatric gastrointestinal endoscopy in a large tertiary referral center in a developing country
description Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy of intravenous sedation for pediatric gastrointestinal endoscopy (GIE) at a tertiary care teaching hospital in a developing country. Methods: We undertook a retrospective review of the sedation service records of pediatric patients who underwent GIE. All endoscopies were performed by a pediatric gastroenterologist. All of the sedation was administered by staff anesthesiologist or anesthetic personnel in the gastroenterology procedure room. Results: Sedation was provided for 222 procedures in 214 patients ranged in age from younger than 1 to 17 years and in weight from 2.7 to 80.0 kg. Intravenous sedation was provided in 176 patients (82.2%). Of these patients, 185 procedures were performed and reviewed, with 152 (82.2%) procedures were esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) alone, 14 (7.6%) procedures were colonoscopy alone, 18 (9.7%) procedures were EGD and colonoscopy, and one procedure was endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS). Most common indications of the procedure were screening for esophageal varices (25.2%), abdominal pain (15.9%), history of upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage (13.6%), and unexplained anemia (10.3%). The majority of preanesthetic problems were hematologic disease, anemia (38.2%); liver disease, cirrhosis (13.5%); and electrolyte imbalance (13.5%). Propofol (94.0%), fentanyl (87.0%), and midazolam (67.8%) were frequently used. The mean dose of propofol was 7.8 ± 4.1 mg·kg-1·h-1, fentanyl 2.3 ± 1.1 mcg·kg-1·h-1, and midazolam 0.1 ± 0.1 mg·kg-1·h-1. Most of them were used in combination. The combination of propofol, fentanyl, and midazolam was commonly employed (46.4%). The mean sedation time of all procedures was 28.2 min and was different according to procedure type. Complications occurred infrequently (13.5%) and were medication or airway related. All complications were easily treated, with no adverse sequelae. Intravenous sedation was successful except for one patient who required general anesthesia. However, all procedures were completed successfully. Conclusions: In the setting of the developing country, intravenous sedation for pediatric GIE by trained anesthetic personnel with appropriate monitoring was safe and effective. Serious adverse events were rare in our population. © 2009 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
author2 Mahidol University
author_facet Mahidol University
Somchai Amornyotin
Prapun Aanpreung
Ungkab Prakarnrattana
Wiyada Chalayonnavin
Sukanda Chatchawankitkul
Wichit Srikureja
format Article
author Somchai Amornyotin
Prapun Aanpreung
Ungkab Prakarnrattana
Wiyada Chalayonnavin
Sukanda Chatchawankitkul
Wichit Srikureja
author_sort Somchai Amornyotin
title Experience of intravenous sedation for pediatric gastrointestinal endoscopy in a large tertiary referral center in a developing country
title_short Experience of intravenous sedation for pediatric gastrointestinal endoscopy in a large tertiary referral center in a developing country
title_full Experience of intravenous sedation for pediatric gastrointestinal endoscopy in a large tertiary referral center in a developing country
title_fullStr Experience of intravenous sedation for pediatric gastrointestinal endoscopy in a large tertiary referral center in a developing country
title_full_unstemmed Experience of intravenous sedation for pediatric gastrointestinal endoscopy in a large tertiary referral center in a developing country
title_sort experience of intravenous sedation for pediatric gastrointestinal endoscopy in a large tertiary referral center in a developing country
publishDate 2018
url https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/27984
_version_ 1763497230657912832