Comparison of Diagnostic and Prognostic Value of Different Electrocardiographic Criteria to Delayed-Enhancement Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Healed Myocardial Infarction

The accuracy of various electrocardiographic (ECG) criteria for the diagnosis of healed myocardial infarction (MI) has never been validated. The objective of this study was to determine the accuracy and prognostic value of standard ECG criteria for the diagnosis of healed MI compared with cardiac ma...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rungroj Krittayaphong, Adisak Maneesai, Vithaya Chaithiraphan, Pairash Saiviroonporn, Olaree Chaiphet, Suthipol Udompunturak
Other Authors: Her Majesty Cardiac Center Bangkok
Format: Article
Published: 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/28188
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Mahidol University
id th-mahidol.28188
record_format dspace
spelling th-mahidol.281882018-09-13T14:05:10Z Comparison of Diagnostic and Prognostic Value of Different Electrocardiographic Criteria to Delayed-Enhancement Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Healed Myocardial Infarction Rungroj Krittayaphong Adisak Maneesai Vithaya Chaithiraphan Pairash Saiviroonporn Olaree Chaiphet Suthipol Udompunturak Her Majesty Cardiac Center Bangkok Her Majesty Cardiac Center Mahidol University Medicine The accuracy of various electrocardiographic (ECG) criteria for the diagnosis of healed myocardial infarction (MI) has never been validated. The objective of this study was to determine the accuracy and prognostic value of standard ECG criteria for the diagnosis of healed MI compared with cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR). Consecutive patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease who were referred for CMR were studied. Twelve-lead electrocardiography and CMR were performed the same day. A standard CMR protocol including a delayed-enhancement (DE) technique was performed. The prognostic value of using various ECG criteria and DE-CMR was assessed for the occurrence of cardiac death, nonfatal MI, or major adverse cardiac events. We studied 1,366 patients. Average follow-up was 31.4 ± 15.8 months. Myocardial scar was detected in 507 patients (37.1%) using DE-CMR. Healed MI using various ECG criteria had sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 44% to 59%, 91% to 95%, and 75% to 79% compared with DE-CMR, respectively. Multivariable Cox regression analysis showed that myocardial scar using DE-CMR was the most powerful predictor for cardiac events, followed by left ventricular ejection fraction. In the absence of DE-CMR data, MI using European Society of Cardiology/American College of Cardiology (ESC/ACC) 2000 criteria was the most powerful predictor. In conclusion, various ECG criteria had limited sensitivity, but high specificity, for the diagnosis of healed MI compared with myocardial scar using DE-CMR. Myocardial scar, left ventricular ejection fraction, and MI using ESC/ACC 2000 criteria were important predictors for cardiac events. © 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. 2018-09-13T07:05:10Z 2018-09-13T07:05:10Z 2009-02-15 Article American Journal of Cardiology. Vol.103, No.4 (2009), 464-470 10.1016/j.amjcard.2008.10.022 00029149 2-s2.0-59049103332 https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/28188 Mahidol University SCOPUS https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=59049103332&origin=inward
institution Mahidol University
building Mahidol University Library
continent Asia
country Thailand
Thailand
content_provider Mahidol University Library
collection Mahidol University Institutional Repository
topic Medicine
spellingShingle Medicine
Rungroj Krittayaphong
Adisak Maneesai
Vithaya Chaithiraphan
Pairash Saiviroonporn
Olaree Chaiphet
Suthipol Udompunturak
Comparison of Diagnostic and Prognostic Value of Different Electrocardiographic Criteria to Delayed-Enhancement Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Healed Myocardial Infarction
description The accuracy of various electrocardiographic (ECG) criteria for the diagnosis of healed myocardial infarction (MI) has never been validated. The objective of this study was to determine the accuracy and prognostic value of standard ECG criteria for the diagnosis of healed MI compared with cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR). Consecutive patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease who were referred for CMR were studied. Twelve-lead electrocardiography and CMR were performed the same day. A standard CMR protocol including a delayed-enhancement (DE) technique was performed. The prognostic value of using various ECG criteria and DE-CMR was assessed for the occurrence of cardiac death, nonfatal MI, or major adverse cardiac events. We studied 1,366 patients. Average follow-up was 31.4 ± 15.8 months. Myocardial scar was detected in 507 patients (37.1%) using DE-CMR. Healed MI using various ECG criteria had sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 44% to 59%, 91% to 95%, and 75% to 79% compared with DE-CMR, respectively. Multivariable Cox regression analysis showed that myocardial scar using DE-CMR was the most powerful predictor for cardiac events, followed by left ventricular ejection fraction. In the absence of DE-CMR data, MI using European Society of Cardiology/American College of Cardiology (ESC/ACC) 2000 criteria was the most powerful predictor. In conclusion, various ECG criteria had limited sensitivity, but high specificity, for the diagnosis of healed MI compared with myocardial scar using DE-CMR. Myocardial scar, left ventricular ejection fraction, and MI using ESC/ACC 2000 criteria were important predictors for cardiac events. © 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
author2 Her Majesty Cardiac Center Bangkok
author_facet Her Majesty Cardiac Center Bangkok
Rungroj Krittayaphong
Adisak Maneesai
Vithaya Chaithiraphan
Pairash Saiviroonporn
Olaree Chaiphet
Suthipol Udompunturak
format Article
author Rungroj Krittayaphong
Adisak Maneesai
Vithaya Chaithiraphan
Pairash Saiviroonporn
Olaree Chaiphet
Suthipol Udompunturak
author_sort Rungroj Krittayaphong
title Comparison of Diagnostic and Prognostic Value of Different Electrocardiographic Criteria to Delayed-Enhancement Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Healed Myocardial Infarction
title_short Comparison of Diagnostic and Prognostic Value of Different Electrocardiographic Criteria to Delayed-Enhancement Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Healed Myocardial Infarction
title_full Comparison of Diagnostic and Prognostic Value of Different Electrocardiographic Criteria to Delayed-Enhancement Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Healed Myocardial Infarction
title_fullStr Comparison of Diagnostic and Prognostic Value of Different Electrocardiographic Criteria to Delayed-Enhancement Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Healed Myocardial Infarction
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Diagnostic and Prognostic Value of Different Electrocardiographic Criteria to Delayed-Enhancement Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Healed Myocardial Infarction
title_sort comparison of diagnostic and prognostic value of different electrocardiographic criteria to delayed-enhancement magnetic resonance imaging for healed myocardial infarction
publishDate 2018
url https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/28188
_version_ 1763495325457186816