Immediate effects of the central posteroanterior mobilization technique on pain and range of motion in patients with mechanical neck pain

Purpose. To determine the immediate effects of the central posteroanterior (PA) mobilization technique on both pain and active cervical range of motion in patients with mechanical neck pain presenting with central or bilateral symptoms. Methods. A randomized controlled trial was conducted in 60 pati...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rotsalai Kanlayanaphotporn, Adit Chiradejnant, Roongtiwa Vachalathiti
Other Authors: Chulalongkorn University
Format: Article
Published: 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/29732
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Mahidol University
id th-mahidol.29732
record_format dspace
spelling th-mahidol.297322018-09-24T16:31:29Z Immediate effects of the central posteroanterior mobilization technique on pain and range of motion in patients with mechanical neck pain Rotsalai Kanlayanaphotporn Adit Chiradejnant Roongtiwa Vachalathiti Chulalongkorn University Mahidol University Medicine Purpose. To determine the immediate effects of the central posteroanterior (PA) mobilization technique on both pain and active cervical range of motion in patients with mechanical neck pain presenting with central or bilateral symptoms. Methods. A randomized controlled trial was conducted in 60 patients who were randomly allocated into either 'central PA' or 'random' mobilization group. Two physical therapists and one assessor participated. Outcome measures included neck pain at rest, pain on the most painful movement, and active cervical range of motion taken before and immediately 5min after the mobilization treatment. Results. Significant reductions in pain at rest and on the most painful movement were noted within-group comparisons (p<0. 001). However, the 'central PA' mobilization group obtained a significantly greater reduction in pain on the most painful movement than the 'random' mobilization group (p<0. 05). Both mobilization techniques had no effects on the active cervical range of motion. However, the differences in the means of pain reduction between both mobilization techniques were modest (<10mm). Conclusion. The clinical recommendation regarding the selection of the central PA mobilization technique for treating patients with central or bilateral mechanical neck pain is therefore arguably. © 2010 Informa UK Ltd. 2018-09-24T09:31:29Z 2018-09-24T09:31:29Z 2010-03-15 Article Disability and Rehabilitation. Vol.32, No.8 (2010), 622-628 10.3109/09638280903204716 14645165 09638288 2-s2.0-77749295475 https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/29732 Mahidol University SCOPUS https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=77749295475&origin=inward
institution Mahidol University
building Mahidol University Library
continent Asia
country Thailand
Thailand
content_provider Mahidol University Library
collection Mahidol University Institutional Repository
topic Medicine
spellingShingle Medicine
Rotsalai Kanlayanaphotporn
Adit Chiradejnant
Roongtiwa Vachalathiti
Immediate effects of the central posteroanterior mobilization technique on pain and range of motion in patients with mechanical neck pain
description Purpose. To determine the immediate effects of the central posteroanterior (PA) mobilization technique on both pain and active cervical range of motion in patients with mechanical neck pain presenting with central or bilateral symptoms. Methods. A randomized controlled trial was conducted in 60 patients who were randomly allocated into either 'central PA' or 'random' mobilization group. Two physical therapists and one assessor participated. Outcome measures included neck pain at rest, pain on the most painful movement, and active cervical range of motion taken before and immediately 5min after the mobilization treatment. Results. Significant reductions in pain at rest and on the most painful movement were noted within-group comparisons (p<0. 001). However, the 'central PA' mobilization group obtained a significantly greater reduction in pain on the most painful movement than the 'random' mobilization group (p<0. 05). Both mobilization techniques had no effects on the active cervical range of motion. However, the differences in the means of pain reduction between both mobilization techniques were modest (<10mm). Conclusion. The clinical recommendation regarding the selection of the central PA mobilization technique for treating patients with central or bilateral mechanical neck pain is therefore arguably. © 2010 Informa UK Ltd.
author2 Chulalongkorn University
author_facet Chulalongkorn University
Rotsalai Kanlayanaphotporn
Adit Chiradejnant
Roongtiwa Vachalathiti
format Article
author Rotsalai Kanlayanaphotporn
Adit Chiradejnant
Roongtiwa Vachalathiti
author_sort Rotsalai Kanlayanaphotporn
title Immediate effects of the central posteroanterior mobilization technique on pain and range of motion in patients with mechanical neck pain
title_short Immediate effects of the central posteroanterior mobilization technique on pain and range of motion in patients with mechanical neck pain
title_full Immediate effects of the central posteroanterior mobilization technique on pain and range of motion in patients with mechanical neck pain
title_fullStr Immediate effects of the central posteroanterior mobilization technique on pain and range of motion in patients with mechanical neck pain
title_full_unstemmed Immediate effects of the central posteroanterior mobilization technique on pain and range of motion in patients with mechanical neck pain
title_sort immediate effects of the central posteroanterior mobilization technique on pain and range of motion in patients with mechanical neck pain
publishDate 2018
url https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/29732
_version_ 1763493611831296000