CT angiography evaluation of endoleak after thoracic endovascular aortic repair in thoracic aortic aneurysm

Objective: Analyze the incidence and findings of endoleak after thoracic endovascular aortic repair by using CT angiography. Material and method: Between August 2006 and December 2008, 68 patients diagnosed with thoracic aortic aneurysm underwent thoracic endovascular aortic repair and were included...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ariya Tanasoontornrerk, Jitladda Wasinrat, Thanongchai Siriapisith, Worawong Slisatkorn
Other Authors: Mahidol University
Format: Article
Published: 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/29809
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Mahidol University
id th-mahidol.29809
record_format dspace
spelling th-mahidol.298092018-09-24T16:35:26Z CT angiography evaluation of endoleak after thoracic endovascular aortic repair in thoracic aortic aneurysm Ariya Tanasoontornrerk Jitladda Wasinrat Thanongchai Siriapisith Worawong Slisatkorn Mahidol University Medicine Objective: Analyze the incidence and findings of endoleak after thoracic endovascular aortic repair by using CT angiography. Material and method: Between August 2006 and December 2008, 68 patients diagnosed with thoracic aortic aneurysm underwent thoracic endovascular aortic repair and were included in the present study. The patients were 47 men and 21 women, with a mean age of 69.± 9.4 years old. Thoraco-abdominal CT angiographic images (64-slice MDCT) after operation of 68 patients were retrospectively reviewed to evaluate incidence of endoleak and classify findings of endoleak. Results: Endoleaks were detected in 26 patients (38.2%). There were type I endoleaks in three cases (11.5%), type II endoleaks in 22 cases (84.6%), and type III endoleaks in one case (3.9%). Type II endoleaks were detected as peritubular collection, mostly located at periphery of the aneurysm. Eleven cases (50%) of type II endoleaks were supplied by left subclavian artery. Twenty patients who had completed 1, 3, and 6 months follow-up CT angiography were selected for further evaluation of changing in size of aneurysm. The measurement of the thoracic aneurysm showed no decreasing of the maximum length of diameter and volume of the aneurysmal sac in endoleak group. Conclusion: Follow-up CT angiography is useful for detection and characterization of endoleak after endovascular aortic repair of thoracic aneurysm. Most of type II endoleaks show peritubular (collection) shape and locate at the periphery. Patients with endoleak after thoracic endovascular aortic repair tend to continue to have sac expansion. 2018-09-24T09:35:26Z 2018-09-24T09:35:26Z 2010-01-01 Article Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand. Vol.93, No.9 (2010), 1050-1057 01252208 01252208 2-s2.0-77958056807 https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/29809 Mahidol University SCOPUS https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=77958056807&origin=inward
institution Mahidol University
building Mahidol University Library
continent Asia
country Thailand
Thailand
content_provider Mahidol University Library
collection Mahidol University Institutional Repository
topic Medicine
spellingShingle Medicine
Ariya Tanasoontornrerk
Jitladda Wasinrat
Thanongchai Siriapisith
Worawong Slisatkorn
CT angiography evaluation of endoleak after thoracic endovascular aortic repair in thoracic aortic aneurysm
description Objective: Analyze the incidence and findings of endoleak after thoracic endovascular aortic repair by using CT angiography. Material and method: Between August 2006 and December 2008, 68 patients diagnosed with thoracic aortic aneurysm underwent thoracic endovascular aortic repair and were included in the present study. The patients were 47 men and 21 women, with a mean age of 69.± 9.4 years old. Thoraco-abdominal CT angiographic images (64-slice MDCT) after operation of 68 patients were retrospectively reviewed to evaluate incidence of endoleak and classify findings of endoleak. Results: Endoleaks were detected in 26 patients (38.2%). There were type I endoleaks in three cases (11.5%), type II endoleaks in 22 cases (84.6%), and type III endoleaks in one case (3.9%). Type II endoleaks were detected as peritubular collection, mostly located at periphery of the aneurysm. Eleven cases (50%) of type II endoleaks were supplied by left subclavian artery. Twenty patients who had completed 1, 3, and 6 months follow-up CT angiography were selected for further evaluation of changing in size of aneurysm. The measurement of the thoracic aneurysm showed no decreasing of the maximum length of diameter and volume of the aneurysmal sac in endoleak group. Conclusion: Follow-up CT angiography is useful for detection and characterization of endoleak after endovascular aortic repair of thoracic aneurysm. Most of type II endoleaks show peritubular (collection) shape and locate at the periphery. Patients with endoleak after thoracic endovascular aortic repair tend to continue to have sac expansion.
author2 Mahidol University
author_facet Mahidol University
Ariya Tanasoontornrerk
Jitladda Wasinrat
Thanongchai Siriapisith
Worawong Slisatkorn
format Article
author Ariya Tanasoontornrerk
Jitladda Wasinrat
Thanongchai Siriapisith
Worawong Slisatkorn
author_sort Ariya Tanasoontornrerk
title CT angiography evaluation of endoleak after thoracic endovascular aortic repair in thoracic aortic aneurysm
title_short CT angiography evaluation of endoleak after thoracic endovascular aortic repair in thoracic aortic aneurysm
title_full CT angiography evaluation of endoleak after thoracic endovascular aortic repair in thoracic aortic aneurysm
title_fullStr CT angiography evaluation of endoleak after thoracic endovascular aortic repair in thoracic aortic aneurysm
title_full_unstemmed CT angiography evaluation of endoleak after thoracic endovascular aortic repair in thoracic aortic aneurysm
title_sort ct angiography evaluation of endoleak after thoracic endovascular aortic repair in thoracic aortic aneurysm
publishDate 2018
url https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/29809
_version_ 1763492433957486592