Focal fibrosis of the breast diagnosed by core needle biopsy under imaging guidance

Background: Focal fibrosis of the breast is an uncommon pathology, recognition of this lesion is important because it could mimic malignant lesions on both mammogram and ultrasonography (US). Concordance with the pathology result from core needle biopsy (CNB) and follow-up are essential to avoid fal...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Cholatip Wiratkapun, Orapin Chansanti, Bussanee Wibulpolprasert, Panuwat Lertsittichai
Other Authors: Mahidol University
Format: Article
Published: 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/32446
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Mahidol University
id th-mahidol.32446
record_format dspace
spelling th-mahidol.324462018-10-19T12:29:42Z Focal fibrosis of the breast diagnosed by core needle biopsy under imaging guidance Cholatip Wiratkapun Orapin Chansanti Bussanee Wibulpolprasert Panuwat Lertsittichai Mahidol University Medicine Background: Focal fibrosis of the breast is an uncommon pathology, recognition of this lesion is important because it could mimic malignant lesions on both mammogram and ultrasonography (US). Concordance with the pathology result from core needle biopsy (CNB) and follow-up are essential to avoid false negative Objective: To characterize the mammographic and US features of focal fibrosis of the breast and to estimate the false negative rate for breast cancer when focal fibrosis was diagnosed by CNB. Material and Method: The subjects were 82 patients diagnosed fibrosis of the breast by CNB during 7-year period. Results: Of 38 mammographic visible lesions there were mass lesions in 12 (32%), calcifications in 14 (37%), mass with calcifications in four (11%), architectural distortion in one (3%) and asymmetrical density in seven (18%). Most of the lesions seen on the US were hypoechoic mass (81%). The suspicious features, which warrant CNB, included irregular shape in 37 (55%), indistinct margin in 38 (57%), and posterior shadowing in 28 (42%). Most of the lesions were categorized as Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) 4A (59%). Thirteen cases underwent surgical biopsy and all showed benign pathologic results. No false-negative cases were detected. Conclusion: Focal fibrosis had some features similar to malignant lesion. CNB showed reliable pathological result. No false negative result was found in the present study. 2018-10-19T05:29:42Z 2018-10-19T05:29:42Z 2013-03-01 Article Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand. Vol.96, No.3 (2013), 340-345 01252208 2-s2.0-84874775878 https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/32446 Mahidol University SCOPUS https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84874775878&origin=inward
institution Mahidol University
building Mahidol University Library
continent Asia
country Thailand
Thailand
content_provider Mahidol University Library
collection Mahidol University Institutional Repository
topic Medicine
spellingShingle Medicine
Cholatip Wiratkapun
Orapin Chansanti
Bussanee Wibulpolprasert
Panuwat Lertsittichai
Focal fibrosis of the breast diagnosed by core needle biopsy under imaging guidance
description Background: Focal fibrosis of the breast is an uncommon pathology, recognition of this lesion is important because it could mimic malignant lesions on both mammogram and ultrasonography (US). Concordance with the pathology result from core needle biopsy (CNB) and follow-up are essential to avoid false negative Objective: To characterize the mammographic and US features of focal fibrosis of the breast and to estimate the false negative rate for breast cancer when focal fibrosis was diagnosed by CNB. Material and Method: The subjects were 82 patients diagnosed fibrosis of the breast by CNB during 7-year period. Results: Of 38 mammographic visible lesions there were mass lesions in 12 (32%), calcifications in 14 (37%), mass with calcifications in four (11%), architectural distortion in one (3%) and asymmetrical density in seven (18%). Most of the lesions seen on the US were hypoechoic mass (81%). The suspicious features, which warrant CNB, included irregular shape in 37 (55%), indistinct margin in 38 (57%), and posterior shadowing in 28 (42%). Most of the lesions were categorized as Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) 4A (59%). Thirteen cases underwent surgical biopsy and all showed benign pathologic results. No false-negative cases were detected. Conclusion: Focal fibrosis had some features similar to malignant lesion. CNB showed reliable pathological result. No false negative result was found in the present study.
author2 Mahidol University
author_facet Mahidol University
Cholatip Wiratkapun
Orapin Chansanti
Bussanee Wibulpolprasert
Panuwat Lertsittichai
format Article
author Cholatip Wiratkapun
Orapin Chansanti
Bussanee Wibulpolprasert
Panuwat Lertsittichai
author_sort Cholatip Wiratkapun
title Focal fibrosis of the breast diagnosed by core needle biopsy under imaging guidance
title_short Focal fibrosis of the breast diagnosed by core needle biopsy under imaging guidance
title_full Focal fibrosis of the breast diagnosed by core needle biopsy under imaging guidance
title_fullStr Focal fibrosis of the breast diagnosed by core needle biopsy under imaging guidance
title_full_unstemmed Focal fibrosis of the breast diagnosed by core needle biopsy under imaging guidance
title_sort focal fibrosis of the breast diagnosed by core needle biopsy under imaging guidance
publishDate 2018
url https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/32446
_version_ 1763490109095673856