Multicompartment model comparison of body fat assessment in thai adolescents

Objective: To examine the limits of agreement of percent body fat (%BF) assessed by different compartment models (2C and 3C compared to 4C). Material and Method: Fifty-one healthy Thai adolescents (25 males and 26 females) aged 16 to 19 years volunteered in the present study. Underwater weighing (UW...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Weerachat Srichan, Kallaya Kijboonchoo, Uruwan Yamborisut, Wiyada Thasanasuwan, Paul Deurenberg
Other Authors: Mahidol University
Format: Article
Published: 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/34414
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Mahidol University
id th-mahidol.34414
record_format dspace
spelling th-mahidol.344142018-11-09T09:44:39Z Multicompartment model comparison of body fat assessment in thai adolescents Weerachat Srichan Kallaya Kijboonchoo Uruwan Yamborisut Wiyada Thasanasuwan Paul Deurenberg Mahidol University Nutritional Consultant Medicine Objective: To examine the limits of agreement of percent body fat (%BF) assessed by different compartment models (2C and 3C compared to 4C). Material and Method: Fifty-one healthy Thai adolescents (25 males and 26 females) aged 16 to 19 years volunteered in the present study. Underwater weighing (UWW) and dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) were used for measurement of %BF for 2C and 3C models. UWW was also used for body density, DEXA for bone mineral content and protein content, and deuterium oxide dilution method for total body water (TBW), used in Lohman's equation for 4C model. Results: Body density, total body water, bone mineral density, and fat free mass were significantly higher in males than in females, whereas females had significantly higher fat than males (p<0.001). Compared to %BF4C, %BFUWW did not show significant deviations from the line of identity in males and females (R2 = 0.85 and 0.75 respectively), whereas %BFDEXA showed significant deviations from the line of identity in females (R2 = 0.59), but not in males (R2 = 0.60). Bland & Altman analysis demonstrated that UWW and DEXA tended to underestimate %BF in leaner adolescents and overestimate %BF in fatter adolescents. Conclusion: Percent body fat using underwater weighing (2C model) may be used interchangeable with the 4C model in both genders. However, DEXA (3C model) can only be used in males and not in females, which require further research. A regression equation to relate 2C and 3C models to 4C was developed to enable a better estimation of percent body fat in Thai adolescents. 2018-11-09T02:44:39Z 2018-11-09T02:44:39Z 2014-01-01 Article Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand. Vol.97, No.1 (2014), 71-76 01252208 2-s2.0-84899456864 https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/34414 Mahidol University SCOPUS https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84899456864&origin=inward
institution Mahidol University
building Mahidol University Library
continent Asia
country Thailand
Thailand
content_provider Mahidol University Library
collection Mahidol University Institutional Repository
topic Medicine
spellingShingle Medicine
Weerachat Srichan
Kallaya Kijboonchoo
Uruwan Yamborisut
Wiyada Thasanasuwan
Paul Deurenberg
Multicompartment model comparison of body fat assessment in thai adolescents
description Objective: To examine the limits of agreement of percent body fat (%BF) assessed by different compartment models (2C and 3C compared to 4C). Material and Method: Fifty-one healthy Thai adolescents (25 males and 26 females) aged 16 to 19 years volunteered in the present study. Underwater weighing (UWW) and dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) were used for measurement of %BF for 2C and 3C models. UWW was also used for body density, DEXA for bone mineral content and protein content, and deuterium oxide dilution method for total body water (TBW), used in Lohman's equation for 4C model. Results: Body density, total body water, bone mineral density, and fat free mass were significantly higher in males than in females, whereas females had significantly higher fat than males (p<0.001). Compared to %BF4C, %BFUWW did not show significant deviations from the line of identity in males and females (R2 = 0.85 and 0.75 respectively), whereas %BFDEXA showed significant deviations from the line of identity in females (R2 = 0.59), but not in males (R2 = 0.60). Bland & Altman analysis demonstrated that UWW and DEXA tended to underestimate %BF in leaner adolescents and overestimate %BF in fatter adolescents. Conclusion: Percent body fat using underwater weighing (2C model) may be used interchangeable with the 4C model in both genders. However, DEXA (3C model) can only be used in males and not in females, which require further research. A regression equation to relate 2C and 3C models to 4C was developed to enable a better estimation of percent body fat in Thai adolescents.
author2 Mahidol University
author_facet Mahidol University
Weerachat Srichan
Kallaya Kijboonchoo
Uruwan Yamborisut
Wiyada Thasanasuwan
Paul Deurenberg
format Article
author Weerachat Srichan
Kallaya Kijboonchoo
Uruwan Yamborisut
Wiyada Thasanasuwan
Paul Deurenberg
author_sort Weerachat Srichan
title Multicompartment model comparison of body fat assessment in thai adolescents
title_short Multicompartment model comparison of body fat assessment in thai adolescents
title_full Multicompartment model comparison of body fat assessment in thai adolescents
title_fullStr Multicompartment model comparison of body fat assessment in thai adolescents
title_full_unstemmed Multicompartment model comparison of body fat assessment in thai adolescents
title_sort multicompartment model comparison of body fat assessment in thai adolescents
publishDate 2018
url https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/34414
_version_ 1763494741356314624