Comparison of ocular biometry and intraocular lens power using a new biometer and a standard biometer

Purpose To compare the repeatability and reproducibility of ocular biometry and intraocular lens (IOL) power obtained with a new optical biometer (AL-Scan) and a standard optical biometer (IOLMaster 500). Setting Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand. Design Prospective comparative...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sabong Srivannaboon, Chareenun Chirapapaisan, Pratuangsri Chonpimai, Sunisa Koodkaew
Other Authors: Mahidol University
Format: Article
Published: 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/34605
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Mahidol University
id th-mahidol.34605
record_format dspace
spelling th-mahidol.346052018-11-09T10:07:48Z Comparison of ocular biometry and intraocular lens power using a new biometer and a standard biometer Sabong Srivannaboon Chareenun Chirapapaisan Pratuangsri Chonpimai Sunisa Koodkaew Mahidol University Medicine Neuroscience Purpose To compare the repeatability and reproducibility of ocular biometry and intraocular lens (IOL) power obtained with a new optical biometer (AL-Scan) and a standard optical biometer (IOLMaster 500). Setting Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand. Design Prospective comparative study. Methods Two independent operators measured eyes with cataract using both biometers. The keratometry values, axial length, anterior chamber depth, white-to-white (WTW) corneal diameter, and IOL power calculated using the Holladay 1 formula obtained with each device were recorded. Intraoperator repeatability and interoperator reproducibility of both devices were analyzed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The agreement in ocular biometry and IOL power between the 2 devices was evaluated by the Bland-Altman method. Results The study recruited 137 eyes of 81 patients. The repeatability and reproducibility of both devices were high for all ocular biometry measurements (ICC, 0.87-1.00). Except for the WTW corneal diameter (ICC, 0.44), the agreement between the biometers was also high (ICC, 0.98-0.99). The IOL powers calculated by the Holladay 1 formula were similar between the 2 biometers. Conclusion The new optical biometer provided excellent repeatability and reproducibility for all ocular biometry. Agreement with the standard optical biometer was good except for the WTW corneal diameter. Financial Disclosure No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned. © 2014 ASCRS and ESCRS. 2018-11-09T02:52:08Z 2018-11-09T02:52:08Z 2014-01-01 Article Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery. Vol.40, No.5 (2014), 709-715 10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.09.020 18734502 08863350 2-s2.0-84899656498 https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/34605 Mahidol University SCOPUS https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84899656498&origin=inward
institution Mahidol University
building Mahidol University Library
continent Asia
country Thailand
Thailand
content_provider Mahidol University Library
collection Mahidol University Institutional Repository
topic Medicine
Neuroscience
spellingShingle Medicine
Neuroscience
Sabong Srivannaboon
Chareenun Chirapapaisan
Pratuangsri Chonpimai
Sunisa Koodkaew
Comparison of ocular biometry and intraocular lens power using a new biometer and a standard biometer
description Purpose To compare the repeatability and reproducibility of ocular biometry and intraocular lens (IOL) power obtained with a new optical biometer (AL-Scan) and a standard optical biometer (IOLMaster 500). Setting Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand. Design Prospective comparative study. Methods Two independent operators measured eyes with cataract using both biometers. The keratometry values, axial length, anterior chamber depth, white-to-white (WTW) corneal diameter, and IOL power calculated using the Holladay 1 formula obtained with each device were recorded. Intraoperator repeatability and interoperator reproducibility of both devices were analyzed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The agreement in ocular biometry and IOL power between the 2 devices was evaluated by the Bland-Altman method. Results The study recruited 137 eyes of 81 patients. The repeatability and reproducibility of both devices were high for all ocular biometry measurements (ICC, 0.87-1.00). Except for the WTW corneal diameter (ICC, 0.44), the agreement between the biometers was also high (ICC, 0.98-0.99). The IOL powers calculated by the Holladay 1 formula were similar between the 2 biometers. Conclusion The new optical biometer provided excellent repeatability and reproducibility for all ocular biometry. Agreement with the standard optical biometer was good except for the WTW corneal diameter. Financial Disclosure No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned. © 2014 ASCRS and ESCRS.
author2 Mahidol University
author_facet Mahidol University
Sabong Srivannaboon
Chareenun Chirapapaisan
Pratuangsri Chonpimai
Sunisa Koodkaew
format Article
author Sabong Srivannaboon
Chareenun Chirapapaisan
Pratuangsri Chonpimai
Sunisa Koodkaew
author_sort Sabong Srivannaboon
title Comparison of ocular biometry and intraocular lens power using a new biometer and a standard biometer
title_short Comparison of ocular biometry and intraocular lens power using a new biometer and a standard biometer
title_full Comparison of ocular biometry and intraocular lens power using a new biometer and a standard biometer
title_fullStr Comparison of ocular biometry and intraocular lens power using a new biometer and a standard biometer
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of ocular biometry and intraocular lens power using a new biometer and a standard biometer
title_sort comparison of ocular biometry and intraocular lens power using a new biometer and a standard biometer
publishDate 2018
url https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/34605
_version_ 1763488876824887296