A new structured interview for children with autism spectrum disorder based on the DSM-IV

• Main Authors: Tippawan Hansakunachai, Rawiwan Roongpraiwan, Tasnawat Sombuntham, Pornprot Limprasert, Nichara Ruangdaraganon
• Other Authors: Thammasat University
• Format: Article
• Published: 2018
• Subjects: Medicine
• Online Access: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/34664
• Institution: Mahidol University

© 2015 Medical Association of Thailand. All rights reserved. Background: Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a common neurodevelopmental disorder in children. The clinical spectrum of ASD includes autism, childhood disintegrative disorder, Asperger syndrome and pervasive developmental disorder not otherwise specified (PDD-NOS). Although the DSM-IV criteria are well accepted for ASD diagnosis, there are some known limitations for clinicians. The most important issue is lack of specific age-appropriate items in each domain. Thus, the DSMIV needs some modifications in order to be appropriate for clinical use. Objective: To develop a structured interview for children based on the DSM-IV diagnostic criteria of autism and PDD-NOS. Material and Method: From June 2006 to December 2008,140 Thai children, 121 boys and 19 girls, already diagnosed with ASD, were recruited through the child development clinics of Ramathibodi and Thammasat University Hospitals in Thailand. A 26-item structured interview was developed with scoring according to the DSM-IV diagnostic criteria for autism and PDD-NOS. To test the accuracy of the structured interview and its reliability, 32 children with ASD were selected and interviewed by four clinicians using the new instrument. One clinician interviewed the parents or caregivers, while three others independently took notes and observed the play behavior of the children. All items from the structured interview as scored by each clinician were compared using inter-rater agreement statistics (Kappa). All of the original 140patients were then clinically diagnosed again using the structured interview and the results were compared with the initial diagnoses. Results: Of the 140 patients originally diagnosed with ASD, 110 and 30 patients were finally diagnosed with the new interview as having autism and PDD-NOS, respectively. The initial diagnoses from 15 cases (10.7%) were changed according to the structured interview. Inter-rater reliability among the four clinicians showed a good level of agreement (Kappa = 0.897) with statistical significance (p<0.001). The authors only compared the items in the structured interview between the autism and PDD-NOS groups from 105 cases aged 2-5 years (79 cases with autism and 26 cases with PDD-NOS) because there were only 4 cases with PDD-NOS in the other age groups. Highly significant differences (p<0.001) in clinical items between patients with autism and patients with PDD-NOS from the final diagnoses were noted in 6 of 8 items in the category of restricted, repetitive and stereotyped patterns of behavior, interests and activities, which were more common in the autism group than the PDD-NOS group. In addition, the autism group had higher frequencies of using finger-pointing to indicate interest rather than verbalization, and idiosyncratic language, than the PDD-NOS group. Conclusion: The newly developed structured interview for Thai children with ASD had a high level of inter-rater reliability between four clinicians. However, most children tested using this structured interview were 2-5 years of age, and the study did not include non-autistic groups. The application of this structured interview needs further study with a wider variety of cases, such as ASD cases from different age groups, children with delayed development and normal children.