Development of a pelvic floor evaluation device
© 2015, Medical Association of Thailand. All rights reserved. Objective: To validate the device and investigate the effect of this device on symptoms, quality of life, and pelvic floor muscle strength. Material and Method: The device was designed to measure vaginal pressure changes using air-pressur...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Article |
Published: |
2018
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/36734 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Mahidol University |
id |
th-mahidol.36734 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
th-mahidol.367342018-11-23T18:00:14Z Development of a pelvic floor evaluation device Jittima Manonai Sakuntala Kamthaworn Kuson Petsarb Rujira Wattanayingcharoenchai Mahidol University Medicine © 2015, Medical Association of Thailand. All rights reserved. Objective: To validate the device and investigate the effect of this device on symptoms, quality of life, and pelvic floor muscle strength. Material and Method: The device was designed to measure vaginal pressure changes using air-pressure balloon and abdominal wall muscle activities using surface electromyography. To test the accuracy of the device, for vaginal pressure measurement, a Mercury sphygmomanometer was used as a gold standard, and for abdominal wall muscle activity, a standard biofeedback machine was used as a reference device. A randomized, controlled trial was conducted in sixty-one women with stress urinary incontinence. They were randomly divided into two groups undergoing PFMT with a single 15-minute biofeedback session (BF + PFMT group) or without biofeedback (PFMT group). The pelvic floor muscle strength, abdominal wall muscle activity and incontinence-specific quality of life questionnaire (I-QOL), measurements were evaluated at baseline and at 8- and 16-week after treatment. Results: The accuracy of vaginal probe pressure perineometry was 98% compared to a standard sphygmomanometer. The device could detect abdominal wall muscles activities at 10 milliseconds (100 Hz), 20 milliseconds (50 Hz), and 50 milliseconds (20 Hz). After 8 and 16 weeks of treatment, there were statistically significant intra-group differences in the maximum vaginal squeeze pressure in both groups. However, the inter-group differences were not demonstrated. The proportion of women who performed pelvic floor muscle exercise correctly was significantly higher in the BF + PFMT group (72.41%) compared to the PFMT group (21.88%) at week 16 (p<0.05). Conclusion: The simple pelvic floor muscle strength evaluation device might be helpful in pelvic floor muscle training in a low resource setting. 2018-11-23T11:00:14Z 2018-11-23T11:00:14Z 2015-01-01 Article Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand. Vol.98, No.3 (2015), 219-225 01252208 01252208 2-s2.0-84929509091 https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/36734 Mahidol University SCOPUS https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84929509091&origin=inward |
institution |
Mahidol University |
building |
Mahidol University Library |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Thailand Thailand |
content_provider |
Mahidol University Library |
collection |
Mahidol University Institutional Repository |
topic |
Medicine |
spellingShingle |
Medicine Jittima Manonai Sakuntala Kamthaworn Kuson Petsarb Rujira Wattanayingcharoenchai Development of a pelvic floor evaluation device |
description |
© 2015, Medical Association of Thailand. All rights reserved. Objective: To validate the device and investigate the effect of this device on symptoms, quality of life, and pelvic floor muscle strength. Material and Method: The device was designed to measure vaginal pressure changes using air-pressure balloon and abdominal wall muscle activities using surface electromyography. To test the accuracy of the device, for vaginal pressure measurement, a Mercury sphygmomanometer was used as a gold standard, and for abdominal wall muscle activity, a standard biofeedback machine was used as a reference device. A randomized, controlled trial was conducted in sixty-one women with stress urinary incontinence. They were randomly divided into two groups undergoing PFMT with a single 15-minute biofeedback session (BF + PFMT group) or without biofeedback (PFMT group). The pelvic floor muscle strength, abdominal wall muscle activity and incontinence-specific quality of life questionnaire (I-QOL), measurements were evaluated at baseline and at 8- and 16-week after treatment. Results: The accuracy of vaginal probe pressure perineometry was 98% compared to a standard sphygmomanometer. The device could detect abdominal wall muscles activities at 10 milliseconds (100 Hz), 20 milliseconds (50 Hz), and 50 milliseconds (20 Hz). After 8 and 16 weeks of treatment, there were statistically significant intra-group differences in the maximum vaginal squeeze pressure in both groups. However, the inter-group differences were not demonstrated. The proportion of women who performed pelvic floor muscle exercise correctly was significantly higher in the BF + PFMT group (72.41%) compared to the PFMT group (21.88%) at week 16 (p<0.05). Conclusion: The simple pelvic floor muscle strength evaluation device might be helpful in pelvic floor muscle training in a low resource setting. |
author2 |
Mahidol University |
author_facet |
Mahidol University Jittima Manonai Sakuntala Kamthaworn Kuson Petsarb Rujira Wattanayingcharoenchai |
format |
Article |
author |
Jittima Manonai Sakuntala Kamthaworn Kuson Petsarb Rujira Wattanayingcharoenchai |
author_sort |
Jittima Manonai |
title |
Development of a pelvic floor evaluation device |
title_short |
Development of a pelvic floor evaluation device |
title_full |
Development of a pelvic floor evaluation device |
title_fullStr |
Development of a pelvic floor evaluation device |
title_full_unstemmed |
Development of a pelvic floor evaluation device |
title_sort |
development of a pelvic floor evaluation device |
publishDate |
2018 |
url |
https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/36734 |
_version_ |
1763490561063387136 |