The comparison between computer-assisted hexapods and ilizarov apparatus in gradual tibial deformity correction: A preliminary study
© 2016, Medical Association of Thailand. All rights reserved. Background: The Hexagonal external fixator (Hexapods) is known to have the ability to correct complex multi-planar deformities faster than the Ilizarov apparatus. However, the difficulty of achieving deformity correction by Hexapods seems...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Article |
Published: |
2018
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/41094 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Mahidol University |
id |
th-mahidol.41094 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
th-mahidol.410942019-03-14T15:02:01Z The comparison between computer-assisted hexapods and ilizarov apparatus in gradual tibial deformity correction: A preliminary study Thanase Ariyawatkul Chatupon Chotigavanichaya Kamolporn Kaewpornsawan Perajit Eamsobhana Mahidol University Medicine © 2016, Medical Association of Thailand. All rights reserved. Background: The Hexagonal external fixator (Hexapods) is known to have the ability to correct complex multi-planar deformities faster than the Ilizarov apparatus. However, the difficulty of achieving deformity correction by Hexapods seems to limit its popularity. Objective: This study aims to compare the advantages and disadvantages of Hexapods and Ilizarov in the gradual correction of complex tibial deformities. Material and Method: A retrospective review was performed in patients with complex tibial deformities treated with Hexapods or with Ilizarov apparatus from 2000 to 2014. Magnitude of deformity, length of time in Hexapods or Ilizarov apparatus, Lengthening Index, and complications were recorded. Statistical analysis was used to compare the two methods. Results: Six patients were treated with Ilizarov apparatus and seven patients were treated with Hexapods. Patients in Hexapods group had more coronal plane angulation before surgery than in the Ilizarov group with statistical significance (p = 0.02). The differences of the sagittal and the axial plane angulations were not statistically significant. The difference of leg length was also not statistically significant. After completion of treatment, no statistical significance of residual deformities was found between the two methods. Lengthening Index had trends toward significance in Hexapods group (p = 0.051). Conclusion: Computer-assisted Hexapods may reduce the Lengthening Index compared to the conventional Ilizarov method. The hexapods device could be beneficial for faster correction of complex deformity if the patients or family members understand how to manipulate the apparatus. 2018-12-11T03:22:27Z 2019-03-14T08:02:01Z 2018-12-11T03:22:27Z 2019-03-14T08:02:01Z 2016-10-01 Article Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand. Vol.99, No.10 (2016), 1126-1130 01252208 2-s2.0-85007425241 https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/41094 Mahidol University SCOPUS https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85007425241&origin=inward |
institution |
Mahidol University |
building |
Mahidol University Library |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Thailand Thailand |
content_provider |
Mahidol University Library |
collection |
Mahidol University Institutional Repository |
topic |
Medicine |
spellingShingle |
Medicine Thanase Ariyawatkul Chatupon Chotigavanichaya Kamolporn Kaewpornsawan Perajit Eamsobhana The comparison between computer-assisted hexapods and ilizarov apparatus in gradual tibial deformity correction: A preliminary study |
description |
© 2016, Medical Association of Thailand. All rights reserved. Background: The Hexagonal external fixator (Hexapods) is known to have the ability to correct complex multi-planar deformities faster than the Ilizarov apparatus. However, the difficulty of achieving deformity correction by Hexapods seems to limit its popularity. Objective: This study aims to compare the advantages and disadvantages of Hexapods and Ilizarov in the gradual correction of complex tibial deformities. Material and Method: A retrospective review was performed in patients with complex tibial deformities treated with Hexapods or with Ilizarov apparatus from 2000 to 2014. Magnitude of deformity, length of time in Hexapods or Ilizarov apparatus, Lengthening Index, and complications were recorded. Statistical analysis was used to compare the two methods. Results: Six patients were treated with Ilizarov apparatus and seven patients were treated with Hexapods. Patients in Hexapods group had more coronal plane angulation before surgery than in the Ilizarov group with statistical significance (p = 0.02). The differences of the sagittal and the axial plane angulations were not statistically significant. The difference of leg length was also not statistically significant. After completion of treatment, no statistical significance of residual deformities was found between the two methods. Lengthening Index had trends toward significance in Hexapods group (p = 0.051). Conclusion: Computer-assisted Hexapods may reduce the Lengthening Index compared to the conventional Ilizarov method. The hexapods device could be beneficial for faster correction of complex deformity if the patients or family members understand how to manipulate the apparatus. |
author2 |
Mahidol University |
author_facet |
Mahidol University Thanase Ariyawatkul Chatupon Chotigavanichaya Kamolporn Kaewpornsawan Perajit Eamsobhana |
format |
Article |
author |
Thanase Ariyawatkul Chatupon Chotigavanichaya Kamolporn Kaewpornsawan Perajit Eamsobhana |
author_sort |
Thanase Ariyawatkul |
title |
The comparison between computer-assisted hexapods and ilizarov apparatus in gradual tibial deformity correction: A preliminary study |
title_short |
The comparison between computer-assisted hexapods and ilizarov apparatus in gradual tibial deformity correction: A preliminary study |
title_full |
The comparison between computer-assisted hexapods and ilizarov apparatus in gradual tibial deformity correction: A preliminary study |
title_fullStr |
The comparison between computer-assisted hexapods and ilizarov apparatus in gradual tibial deformity correction: A preliminary study |
title_full_unstemmed |
The comparison between computer-assisted hexapods and ilizarov apparatus in gradual tibial deformity correction: A preliminary study |
title_sort |
comparison between computer-assisted hexapods and ilizarov apparatus in gradual tibial deformity correction: a preliminary study |
publishDate |
2018 |
url |
https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/41094 |
_version_ |
1763491345797742592 |