A comprehensive examination of the relation of three citation-based journal metrics to expert judgment of journal quality
© 2015 Elsevier Ltd. The academic and research policy communities have seen a long debate concerning the merits of peer review and quantitative citation-based metrics in evaluation of research. Some have called for replacing peer review with use of metrics for some evaluation purposes, while others...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | Peter Haddawy, Saeed Ul Hassan, Awais Asghar, Sarah Amin |
---|---|
Other Authors: | Mahidol University |
Format: | Article |
Published: |
2018
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/43459 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Mahidol University |
Similar Items
-
Citation analysis of the IES journal
by: Chan, Sok Kuen.
Published: (2009) -
Comparison of Spanish and Swedish journal indicators (impact factor and self-citation rate) in the Journal Citation Reports
by: Mohammad Hossein Biglu, et al.
Published: (2021) -
Citation analysis of Singapore Journal of Physics
by: Goi, Geok San.
Published: (2009) -
Identifying Important Citations Using Contextual Information from Full Text
by: Saeed Ul Hassan, et al.
Published: (2018) -
Distinguishing Citation Quality for Journal Impact Assessment
by: LIM, Andrew, et al.
Published: (2009)