Subcortical SISCOM hyperperfusion: Should we pay more attention to it?

© 2018 British Epilepsy Association Purpose: Demonstrating cerebral blood flow changes during seizures, ictal-interictal single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) with co-registration to MRI (SISCOM) reflects brain activation and its pathways of spread. To investigate subcortical ictal hype...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jerome Aupy, Sattawut Wongwiangjunt, Zhong I. Wang, Guiyun Wu, Andreas Alexopoulos
Other Authors: Université de Bordeaux
Format: Article
Published: 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/46221
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Mahidol University
id th-mahidol.46221
record_format dspace
spelling th-mahidol.462212019-08-28T13:41:54Z Subcortical SISCOM hyperperfusion: Should we pay more attention to it? Jerome Aupy Sattawut Wongwiangjunt Zhong I. Wang Guiyun Wu Andreas Alexopoulos Université de Bordeaux CHU Hôpitaux de Bordeaux Cleveland Clinic Foundation Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University Medicine Neuroscience © 2018 British Epilepsy Association Purpose: Demonstrating cerebral blood flow changes during seizures, ictal-interictal single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) with co-registration to MRI (SISCOM) reflects brain activation and its pathways of spread. To investigate subcortical ictal hyperperfusion patterns during focal seizures, we retrospectively reviewed SISCOM analysis of patients who became seizure-free after cortical resection. Our aim was to evaluate the relationship between epileptogenic zones and subcortical hyperperfusion. Method: 67 patients were identified as having SISCOM evaluation and having remained seizure-free for at least one year after surgical resection. SISCOM analysis was blindly reviewed for localization of basal ganglia (BG), thalamic (TN) and cerebellar (CH) hyperperfusion based on three different thresholds. Subcortical activation and epilepsy characteristics were then compared between patients. For a given region of interest and threshold, the sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive value for correct lateralization of the epilepsy side was calculated. Results: Depending on the threshold used, BG hyperperfusion was found in 37.3–73.9% of patients, TN hyperperfusion in 31.3–68.1% and CH hyperperfusion in 13.5–29%. For a threshold of 1.5, the best predictive positive value for correct lateralization of the epilepsy side was obtained with BG/CH coactivation (89%). For a threshold of 2.0 and 2.5, it was obtained with BG/TN coactivation (88%) and BG activation (82%), respectively. Conclusion: Subcortical SISCOM hyperperfusion could offer additional clues in terms of lateralization. 2019-08-23T11:38:19Z 2019-08-23T11:38:19Z 2018-11-01 Article Seizure. Vol.62, (2018), 43-48 10.1016/j.seizure.2018.09.017 15322688 10591311 2-s2.0-85054063091 https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/46221 Mahidol University SCOPUS https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85054063091&origin=inward
institution Mahidol University
building Mahidol University Library
continent Asia
country Thailand
Thailand
content_provider Mahidol University Library
collection Mahidol University Institutional Repository
topic Medicine
Neuroscience
spellingShingle Medicine
Neuroscience
Jerome Aupy
Sattawut Wongwiangjunt
Zhong I. Wang
Guiyun Wu
Andreas Alexopoulos
Subcortical SISCOM hyperperfusion: Should we pay more attention to it?
description © 2018 British Epilepsy Association Purpose: Demonstrating cerebral blood flow changes during seizures, ictal-interictal single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) with co-registration to MRI (SISCOM) reflects brain activation and its pathways of spread. To investigate subcortical ictal hyperperfusion patterns during focal seizures, we retrospectively reviewed SISCOM analysis of patients who became seizure-free after cortical resection. Our aim was to evaluate the relationship between epileptogenic zones and subcortical hyperperfusion. Method: 67 patients were identified as having SISCOM evaluation and having remained seizure-free for at least one year after surgical resection. SISCOM analysis was blindly reviewed for localization of basal ganglia (BG), thalamic (TN) and cerebellar (CH) hyperperfusion based on three different thresholds. Subcortical activation and epilepsy characteristics were then compared between patients. For a given region of interest and threshold, the sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive value for correct lateralization of the epilepsy side was calculated. Results: Depending on the threshold used, BG hyperperfusion was found in 37.3–73.9% of patients, TN hyperperfusion in 31.3–68.1% and CH hyperperfusion in 13.5–29%. For a threshold of 1.5, the best predictive positive value for correct lateralization of the epilepsy side was obtained with BG/CH coactivation (89%). For a threshold of 2.0 and 2.5, it was obtained with BG/TN coactivation (88%) and BG activation (82%), respectively. Conclusion: Subcortical SISCOM hyperperfusion could offer additional clues in terms of lateralization.
author2 Université de Bordeaux
author_facet Université de Bordeaux
Jerome Aupy
Sattawut Wongwiangjunt
Zhong I. Wang
Guiyun Wu
Andreas Alexopoulos
format Article
author Jerome Aupy
Sattawut Wongwiangjunt
Zhong I. Wang
Guiyun Wu
Andreas Alexopoulos
author_sort Jerome Aupy
title Subcortical SISCOM hyperperfusion: Should we pay more attention to it?
title_short Subcortical SISCOM hyperperfusion: Should we pay more attention to it?
title_full Subcortical SISCOM hyperperfusion: Should we pay more attention to it?
title_fullStr Subcortical SISCOM hyperperfusion: Should we pay more attention to it?
title_full_unstemmed Subcortical SISCOM hyperperfusion: Should we pay more attention to it?
title_sort subcortical siscom hyperperfusion: should we pay more attention to it?
publishDate 2019
url https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/46221
_version_ 1763497921066565632