BK Virus–Associated Nephropathy: Current Situation in a Resource-Limited Country

© 2017 The Authors Background: Data on BK virus–associated nephropathy (BKVAN) and treatment strategy in a resource-limited country are scarce. This study aimed to evaluate epidemiology of BKVAN and its situation in Thailand. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted among adult kidney transpl...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: P. Yooprasert, P. Rotjanapan
Other Authors: Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University
Format: Article
Published: 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/47089
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Mahidol University
id th-mahidol.47089
record_format dspace
spelling th-mahidol.470892019-08-28T13:31:29Z BK Virus–Associated Nephropathy: Current Situation in a Resource-Limited Country P. Yooprasert P. Rotjanapan Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University Medicine © 2017 The Authors Background: Data on BK virus–associated nephropathy (BKVAN) and treatment strategy in a resource-limited country are scarce. This study aimed to evaluate epidemiology of BKVAN and its situation in Thailand. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted among adult kidney transplant recipients at Ramathibodi Hospital from October 2011 to September 2016. Patients' demographic data, information on kidney transplantation, immunosuppressive therapy, cytomegalovirus and BK virus infections, and allograft outcomes were retrieved and analyzed. Results: This study included 623 kidney transplant recipients. Only 327 patients (52.49%) received BK virus infection screening, and 176 of 327 patients had allograft dysfunction as a trigger for screening. BKVAN was identified in 39 of 327 patients (11.93%). Deceased donor transplantation and cytomegalovirus infection were associated with a higher risk of BKVAN (odds ratio = 2.2, P =.024, 95% confidence intervals [1.1, 4.43], and odds ratio = 2.6, P =.006, 95% confidence intervals [1.29, 5.26], respectively). BKVAN patients were at significantly higher risk for allograft rejection (P <.001) and allograft failure (P =.036). At the end of the study, 4 graft losses were documented (12.12%). Conclusions: BKVAN was associated with high rate of allograft rejection and failure. However, surveillance of its complications has been underperformed at our facility. Implementing a formal practice guideline may improve allograft outcome in resource-limited countries. 2019-08-28T06:31:29Z 2019-08-28T06:31:29Z 2018-01-01 Article Transplantation Proceedings. Vol.50, No.1 (2018), 130-136 10.1016/j.transproceed.2017.11.007 18732623 00411345 2-s2.0-85044265607 https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/47089 Mahidol University SCOPUS https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85044265607&origin=inward
institution Mahidol University
building Mahidol University Library
continent Asia
country Thailand
Thailand
content_provider Mahidol University Library
collection Mahidol University Institutional Repository
topic Medicine
spellingShingle Medicine
P. Yooprasert
P. Rotjanapan
BK Virus–Associated Nephropathy: Current Situation in a Resource-Limited Country
description © 2017 The Authors Background: Data on BK virus–associated nephropathy (BKVAN) and treatment strategy in a resource-limited country are scarce. This study aimed to evaluate epidemiology of BKVAN and its situation in Thailand. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted among adult kidney transplant recipients at Ramathibodi Hospital from October 2011 to September 2016. Patients' demographic data, information on kidney transplantation, immunosuppressive therapy, cytomegalovirus and BK virus infections, and allograft outcomes were retrieved and analyzed. Results: This study included 623 kidney transplant recipients. Only 327 patients (52.49%) received BK virus infection screening, and 176 of 327 patients had allograft dysfunction as a trigger for screening. BKVAN was identified in 39 of 327 patients (11.93%). Deceased donor transplantation and cytomegalovirus infection were associated with a higher risk of BKVAN (odds ratio = 2.2, P =.024, 95% confidence intervals [1.1, 4.43], and odds ratio = 2.6, P =.006, 95% confidence intervals [1.29, 5.26], respectively). BKVAN patients were at significantly higher risk for allograft rejection (P <.001) and allograft failure (P =.036). At the end of the study, 4 graft losses were documented (12.12%). Conclusions: BKVAN was associated with high rate of allograft rejection and failure. However, surveillance of its complications has been underperformed at our facility. Implementing a formal practice guideline may improve allograft outcome in resource-limited countries.
author2 Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University
author_facet Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University
P. Yooprasert
P. Rotjanapan
format Article
author P. Yooprasert
P. Rotjanapan
author_sort P. Yooprasert
title BK Virus–Associated Nephropathy: Current Situation in a Resource-Limited Country
title_short BK Virus–Associated Nephropathy: Current Situation in a Resource-Limited Country
title_full BK Virus–Associated Nephropathy: Current Situation in a Resource-Limited Country
title_fullStr BK Virus–Associated Nephropathy: Current Situation in a Resource-Limited Country
title_full_unstemmed BK Virus–Associated Nephropathy: Current Situation in a Resource-Limited Country
title_sort bk virus–associated nephropathy: current situation in a resource-limited country
publishDate 2019
url https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/47089
_version_ 1763496663171727360