Weight control specific compensatory health beliefs: Hypothetical testing and model extension
© 2017 Kasetsart University Compensatory health beliefs (CHBs) refers to the beliefs that unhealthy behavior can be compensated for by activating healthy behavior. The purposes of this study were to investigate various theoretical hypotheses in the CHB model and to present a model whose concept expa...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Article |
Published: |
2019
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/47413 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Mahidol University |
id |
th-mahidol.47413 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
th-mahidol.474132019-08-28T14:05:31Z Weight control specific compensatory health beliefs: Hypothetical testing and model extension Sittichai Thongworn Veena Sirisuk Mahidol University Social Sciences © 2017 Kasetsart University Compensatory health beliefs (CHBs) refers to the beliefs that unhealthy behavior can be compensated for by activating healthy behavior. The purposes of this study were to investigate various theoretical hypotheses in the CHB model and to present a model whose concept expands from the original CHB model. A cross-sectional survey was designed for the present study. The sample consisted of 788 undergraduate students (mean age 19 years). All participants were asked to complete a questionnaire regarding weight control specific CHBs, self-efficacy, self-concordance, motivational conflict responses, compensatory behavior intentions, and actual behavioral control. Path modeling showed that the degree of desirability influenced resolving motivational conflict by resisting desire and adapting risk perception/outcome expectancy when implementing tempting behavior. Identified self-concordance had an influence on resolving conflict by resisting desire. Weight control self-efficacy had an influence on resolving motivational conflict by resisting desire and adapting risk perception/outcome expectancy when implementing tempting behavior. Weight control self-efficacy had an influence on identified self-concordance. Compensatory behavior self-efficacy had an influence on compensatory behavior intention. Actual behavioral control had an influence on compensatory behavior intention and compensatory behavioral self-efficacy. Further work is required to explore all of the processes of the model. 2019-08-28T07:05:31Z 2019-08-28T07:05:31Z 2018-05-01 Article Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences. Vol.39, No.2 (2018), 312-319 10.1016/j.kjss.2017.06.006 24523151 2-s2.0-85044786010 https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/47413 Mahidol University SCOPUS https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85044786010&origin=inward |
institution |
Mahidol University |
building |
Mahidol University Library |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Thailand Thailand |
content_provider |
Mahidol University Library |
collection |
Mahidol University Institutional Repository |
topic |
Social Sciences |
spellingShingle |
Social Sciences Sittichai Thongworn Veena Sirisuk Weight control specific compensatory health beliefs: Hypothetical testing and model extension |
description |
© 2017 Kasetsart University Compensatory health beliefs (CHBs) refers to the beliefs that unhealthy behavior can be compensated for by activating healthy behavior. The purposes of this study were to investigate various theoretical hypotheses in the CHB model and to present a model whose concept expands from the original CHB model. A cross-sectional survey was designed for the present study. The sample consisted of 788 undergraduate students (mean age 19 years). All participants were asked to complete a questionnaire regarding weight control specific CHBs, self-efficacy, self-concordance, motivational conflict responses, compensatory behavior intentions, and actual behavioral control. Path modeling showed that the degree of desirability influenced resolving motivational conflict by resisting desire and adapting risk perception/outcome expectancy when implementing tempting behavior. Identified self-concordance had an influence on resolving conflict by resisting desire. Weight control self-efficacy had an influence on resolving motivational conflict by resisting desire and adapting risk perception/outcome expectancy when implementing tempting behavior. Weight control self-efficacy had an influence on identified self-concordance. Compensatory behavior self-efficacy had an influence on compensatory behavior intention. Actual behavioral control had an influence on compensatory behavior intention and compensatory behavioral self-efficacy. Further work is required to explore all of the processes of the model. |
author2 |
Mahidol University |
author_facet |
Mahidol University Sittichai Thongworn Veena Sirisuk |
format |
Article |
author |
Sittichai Thongworn Veena Sirisuk |
author_sort |
Sittichai Thongworn |
title |
Weight control specific compensatory health beliefs: Hypothetical testing and model extension |
title_short |
Weight control specific compensatory health beliefs: Hypothetical testing and model extension |
title_full |
Weight control specific compensatory health beliefs: Hypothetical testing and model extension |
title_fullStr |
Weight control specific compensatory health beliefs: Hypothetical testing and model extension |
title_full_unstemmed |
Weight control specific compensatory health beliefs: Hypothetical testing and model extension |
title_sort |
weight control specific compensatory health beliefs: hypothetical testing and model extension |
publishDate |
2019 |
url |
https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/47413 |
_version_ |
1763491711707774976 |