Blood and liver biopsy for the non-destructive screening of tilapia lake virus

© 2019 John Wiley & Sons Ltd Detection of tilapia lake virus (TiLV) in tilapines is mainly from visceral organs of killed fish. However, lethal sampling might not be viable to broodstock and economically important ornamental cichlids. To contribute towards screening of the virus in asymptomati...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chutipong Chiamkunakorn, Vimbai Irene Machimbirike, Saengchan Senapin, Pongsak Khunrae, Ha Thanh Dong, Triwit Rattanarojpong
Other Authors: Suan Sunandha Rajabhat University
Format: Article
Published: 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/49714
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Mahidol University
id th-mahidol.49714
record_format dspace
spelling th-mahidol.497142020-01-27T14:21:10Z Blood and liver biopsy for the non-destructive screening of tilapia lake virus Chutipong Chiamkunakorn Vimbai Irene Machimbirike Saengchan Senapin Pongsak Khunrae Ha Thanh Dong Triwit Rattanarojpong Suan Sunandha Rajabhat University Mahidol University Thailand National Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology King Mongkut s University of Technology Thonburi Agricultural and Biological Sciences © 2019 John Wiley & Sons Ltd Detection of tilapia lake virus (TiLV) in tilapines is mainly from visceral organs of killed fish. However, lethal sampling might not be viable to broodstock and economically important ornamental cichlids. To contribute towards screening of the virus in asymptomatic infected fish, a subclinically infected population of Nile tilapia adults obtained from a local farm was preliminarily tested to compare different non-lethal sampling methods, for example liver biopsy, gill biopsy, fin clip, mucus, faeces and blood for detection of TiLV. Only liver and blood samples gave positive results by PCR. Since blood sampling is relatively simpler, it was further used for five naturally co-cultured juvenile fish species from above-mentioned farm including 40 red tilapia broodstock and 20 Nile tilapia adults from two other different farms. The results showed that from the tested fish, 4 of 5 Nile tilapia, 2 of 5 hybrid red tilapia and 3 of 5 giant gourami blood samples tested positive, while 38 of 40 blood samples of red tilapia tested positive for TiLV in second-step PCR. Sequencing representative PCR amplicons of positive samples confirmed sequence identity to TiLV. In conclusion, both blood and liver biopsy are practical non-destructive sampling platforms for TiLV screening in cichlids with blood being more convenient, especially for tilapia broodstock. 2020-01-27T07:21:10Z 2020-01-27T07:21:10Z 2019-11-01 Article Journal of Fish Diseases. Vol.42, No.11 (2019), 1629-1636 10.1111/jfd.13076 13652761 01407775 2-s2.0-85073666548 https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/49714 Mahidol University SCOPUS https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85073666548&origin=inward
institution Mahidol University
building Mahidol University Library
continent Asia
country Thailand
Thailand
content_provider Mahidol University Library
collection Mahidol University Institutional Repository
topic Agricultural and Biological Sciences
spellingShingle Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Chutipong Chiamkunakorn
Vimbai Irene Machimbirike
Saengchan Senapin
Pongsak Khunrae
Ha Thanh Dong
Triwit Rattanarojpong
Blood and liver biopsy for the non-destructive screening of tilapia lake virus
description © 2019 John Wiley & Sons Ltd Detection of tilapia lake virus (TiLV) in tilapines is mainly from visceral organs of killed fish. However, lethal sampling might not be viable to broodstock and economically important ornamental cichlids. To contribute towards screening of the virus in asymptomatic infected fish, a subclinically infected population of Nile tilapia adults obtained from a local farm was preliminarily tested to compare different non-lethal sampling methods, for example liver biopsy, gill biopsy, fin clip, mucus, faeces and blood for detection of TiLV. Only liver and blood samples gave positive results by PCR. Since blood sampling is relatively simpler, it was further used for five naturally co-cultured juvenile fish species from above-mentioned farm including 40 red tilapia broodstock and 20 Nile tilapia adults from two other different farms. The results showed that from the tested fish, 4 of 5 Nile tilapia, 2 of 5 hybrid red tilapia and 3 of 5 giant gourami blood samples tested positive, while 38 of 40 blood samples of red tilapia tested positive for TiLV in second-step PCR. Sequencing representative PCR amplicons of positive samples confirmed sequence identity to TiLV. In conclusion, both blood and liver biopsy are practical non-destructive sampling platforms for TiLV screening in cichlids with blood being more convenient, especially for tilapia broodstock.
author2 Suan Sunandha Rajabhat University
author_facet Suan Sunandha Rajabhat University
Chutipong Chiamkunakorn
Vimbai Irene Machimbirike
Saengchan Senapin
Pongsak Khunrae
Ha Thanh Dong
Triwit Rattanarojpong
format Article
author Chutipong Chiamkunakorn
Vimbai Irene Machimbirike
Saengchan Senapin
Pongsak Khunrae
Ha Thanh Dong
Triwit Rattanarojpong
author_sort Chutipong Chiamkunakorn
title Blood and liver biopsy for the non-destructive screening of tilapia lake virus
title_short Blood and liver biopsy for the non-destructive screening of tilapia lake virus
title_full Blood and liver biopsy for the non-destructive screening of tilapia lake virus
title_fullStr Blood and liver biopsy for the non-destructive screening of tilapia lake virus
title_full_unstemmed Blood and liver biopsy for the non-destructive screening of tilapia lake virus
title_sort blood and liver biopsy for the non-destructive screening of tilapia lake virus
publishDate 2020
url https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/49714
_version_ 1763487836884959232