Sunscreen application to the face persists beyond 2 hours in indoor workers: an open-label trial
© 2018, © 2018 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. Background: The American Academy of Dermatology recommends reapplication of sunscreen every two hours for adequate sun protection when outdoor. However, the frequency of reapplication needed to achieve adequate protection in...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Article |
Published: |
2020
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/51538 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Mahidol University |
id |
th-mahidol.51538 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
th-mahidol.515382020-01-27T16:41:03Z Sunscreen application to the face persists beyond 2 hours in indoor workers: an open-label trial Chutima Rungananchai Narumol Silpa-archa Chanisada Wongpraparut Bordeesuda Suiwongsa Viboon Sangveraphunsiri Woraphong Manuskiatti Chulalongkorn University Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University Medicine © 2018, © 2018 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. Background: The American Academy of Dermatology recommends reapplication of sunscreen every two hours for adequate sun protection when outdoor. However, the frequency of reapplication needed to achieve adequate protection in indoor workers remains unknown. Objective: To investigate the persistence of sunscreen applied once in the morning on the face of indoor workers throughout a normal 8-hour workday. Methods: This open-label trial included 20 healthy volunteers who work indoors. Volunteers applied 1 g of sunscreen (2 mg/cm2) mixed with 2% invisible blue fluorescent agent on the face in the morning. Photographs were taken by VISIA-CR booth in UV mode at 8 am and then every 2 hours thereafter until 4 pm with limited outdoor activity less than 1 hour. Six areas of the face were analyzed using digital image analysis software. The primary outcome was the total amount of sunscreen diminution during the 8-hour study period. Results: The amount of sunscreen decreased with mean peak reduction of 16.3% at 2 hours, and minimal reduction thereafter. Total sunscreen reduction was 28.2% at the end of the 8-hour day. Limitations: Small study population. Conclusion: For indoor workers who applied adequate amount of sunscreen once in the morning, reapplication of sunscreen may be unnecessary. 2020-01-27T09:41:03Z 2020-01-27T09:41:03Z 2019-07-04 Article Journal of Dermatological Treatment. Vol.30, No.5 (2019), 483-486 10.1080/09546634.2018.1530440 14711753 09546634 2-s2.0-85057559091 https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/51538 Mahidol University SCOPUS https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85057559091&origin=inward |
institution |
Mahidol University |
building |
Mahidol University Library |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Thailand Thailand |
content_provider |
Mahidol University Library |
collection |
Mahidol University Institutional Repository |
topic |
Medicine |
spellingShingle |
Medicine Chutima Rungananchai Narumol Silpa-archa Chanisada Wongpraparut Bordeesuda Suiwongsa Viboon Sangveraphunsiri Woraphong Manuskiatti Sunscreen application to the face persists beyond 2 hours in indoor workers: an open-label trial |
description |
© 2018, © 2018 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. Background: The American Academy of Dermatology recommends reapplication of sunscreen every two hours for adequate sun protection when outdoor. However, the frequency of reapplication needed to achieve adequate protection in indoor workers remains unknown. Objective: To investigate the persistence of sunscreen applied once in the morning on the face of indoor workers throughout a normal 8-hour workday. Methods: This open-label trial included 20 healthy volunteers who work indoors. Volunteers applied 1 g of sunscreen (2 mg/cm2) mixed with 2% invisible blue fluorescent agent on the face in the morning. Photographs were taken by VISIA-CR booth in UV mode at 8 am and then every 2 hours thereafter until 4 pm with limited outdoor activity less than 1 hour. Six areas of the face were analyzed using digital image analysis software. The primary outcome was the total amount of sunscreen diminution during the 8-hour study period. Results: The amount of sunscreen decreased with mean peak reduction of 16.3% at 2 hours, and minimal reduction thereafter. Total sunscreen reduction was 28.2% at the end of the 8-hour day. Limitations: Small study population. Conclusion: For indoor workers who applied adequate amount of sunscreen once in the morning, reapplication of sunscreen may be unnecessary. |
author2 |
Chulalongkorn University |
author_facet |
Chulalongkorn University Chutima Rungananchai Narumol Silpa-archa Chanisada Wongpraparut Bordeesuda Suiwongsa Viboon Sangveraphunsiri Woraphong Manuskiatti |
format |
Article |
author |
Chutima Rungananchai Narumol Silpa-archa Chanisada Wongpraparut Bordeesuda Suiwongsa Viboon Sangveraphunsiri Woraphong Manuskiatti |
author_sort |
Chutima Rungananchai |
title |
Sunscreen application to the face persists beyond 2 hours in indoor workers: an open-label trial |
title_short |
Sunscreen application to the face persists beyond 2 hours in indoor workers: an open-label trial |
title_full |
Sunscreen application to the face persists beyond 2 hours in indoor workers: an open-label trial |
title_fullStr |
Sunscreen application to the face persists beyond 2 hours in indoor workers: an open-label trial |
title_full_unstemmed |
Sunscreen application to the face persists beyond 2 hours in indoor workers: an open-label trial |
title_sort |
sunscreen application to the face persists beyond 2 hours in indoor workers: an open-label trial |
publishDate |
2020 |
url |
https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/51538 |
_version_ |
1763492211331170304 |