Vitamin D status in Thai dermatologists and working-age Thai population

© 2018 Japanese Dermatological Association This study aimed to determine the prevalence of vitamin D insufficiency among Thai dermatologists compared with the general working-age population in Bangkok. A cross-sectional study was conducted in healthy Thai physicians who had at least 1 years’ experie...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Natta Rajatanavin, Silada Kanokrungsee, Wichai Aekplakorn
Other Authors: Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University
Format: Article
Published: 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/51814
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Mahidol University
id th-mahidol.51814
record_format dspace
spelling th-mahidol.518142020-01-27T17:01:58Z Vitamin D status in Thai dermatologists and working-age Thai population Natta Rajatanavin Silada Kanokrungsee Wichai Aekplakorn Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University Medicine © 2018 Japanese Dermatological Association This study aimed to determine the prevalence of vitamin D insufficiency among Thai dermatologists compared with the general working-age population in Bangkok. A cross-sectional study was conducted in healthy Thai physicians who had at least 1 years’ experience in dermatology practise and a subsample of the general Thai population from the Fourth National Health Survey. Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25[OH]D), a combination of 25(OH)D2 and 25(OH)D3, levels in both groups were measured using liquid chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry. The majority of dermatologists were of Fitzpatrick skin type III (n = 61, 61.3%) or IV (n = 32, 33.3%). The mean serum 25(OH)D and 25(OH)D3 levels were 18.9 and 18.2 ng/mL, respectively, whereas the corresponding levels in the general population were 26.5 and 25.8 ng/mL. None of the dermatologist had serum 25(OH)D sufficiency (>30 ng/mL), 38 (38.78%) had vitamin D insufficiency (20–30 ng/mL) and 60 (61.22%) had vitamin D deficiency (<20 ng/mL). The frequency of vitamin D deficiency in dermatologists was significantly higher than in the general population (61.2% vs 19.2%, P < 0.001). Ninety percent of dermatologists used sunscreen daily and spent time mostly indoors. Dermatologists used physical sun-protection more than half of the time when outdoors, for example, a book or paper as a sunshade (70.3%), an umbrella (48.4%), a long-sleeved shirt (20.4%) or a hat (9.7%). In conclusion, dermatologists showed a remarkably high prevalence of vitamin D deficiency which may be due to inadequate exposure to sunlight, regular use of sunscreen and practicing various sun-protection activities. 2020-01-27T10:01:58Z 2020-01-27T10:01:58Z 2019-03-01 Article Journal of Dermatology. Vol.46, No.3 (2019), 206-212 10.1111/1346-8138.14742 13468138 03852407 2-s2.0-85059112809 https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/51814 Mahidol University SCOPUS https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85059112809&origin=inward
institution Mahidol University
building Mahidol University Library
continent Asia
country Thailand
Thailand
content_provider Mahidol University Library
collection Mahidol University Institutional Repository
topic Medicine
spellingShingle Medicine
Natta Rajatanavin
Silada Kanokrungsee
Wichai Aekplakorn
Vitamin D status in Thai dermatologists and working-age Thai population
description © 2018 Japanese Dermatological Association This study aimed to determine the prevalence of vitamin D insufficiency among Thai dermatologists compared with the general working-age population in Bangkok. A cross-sectional study was conducted in healthy Thai physicians who had at least 1 years’ experience in dermatology practise and a subsample of the general Thai population from the Fourth National Health Survey. Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25[OH]D), a combination of 25(OH)D2 and 25(OH)D3, levels in both groups were measured using liquid chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry. The majority of dermatologists were of Fitzpatrick skin type III (n = 61, 61.3%) or IV (n = 32, 33.3%). The mean serum 25(OH)D and 25(OH)D3 levels were 18.9 and 18.2 ng/mL, respectively, whereas the corresponding levels in the general population were 26.5 and 25.8 ng/mL. None of the dermatologist had serum 25(OH)D sufficiency (>30 ng/mL), 38 (38.78%) had vitamin D insufficiency (20–30 ng/mL) and 60 (61.22%) had vitamin D deficiency (<20 ng/mL). The frequency of vitamin D deficiency in dermatologists was significantly higher than in the general population (61.2% vs 19.2%, P < 0.001). Ninety percent of dermatologists used sunscreen daily and spent time mostly indoors. Dermatologists used physical sun-protection more than half of the time when outdoors, for example, a book or paper as a sunshade (70.3%), an umbrella (48.4%), a long-sleeved shirt (20.4%) or a hat (9.7%). In conclusion, dermatologists showed a remarkably high prevalence of vitamin D deficiency which may be due to inadequate exposure to sunlight, regular use of sunscreen and practicing various sun-protection activities.
author2 Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University
author_facet Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University
Natta Rajatanavin
Silada Kanokrungsee
Wichai Aekplakorn
format Article
author Natta Rajatanavin
Silada Kanokrungsee
Wichai Aekplakorn
author_sort Natta Rajatanavin
title Vitamin D status in Thai dermatologists and working-age Thai population
title_short Vitamin D status in Thai dermatologists and working-age Thai population
title_full Vitamin D status in Thai dermatologists and working-age Thai population
title_fullStr Vitamin D status in Thai dermatologists and working-age Thai population
title_full_unstemmed Vitamin D status in Thai dermatologists and working-age Thai population
title_sort vitamin d status in thai dermatologists and working-age thai population
publishDate 2020
url https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/51814
_version_ 1763493577209413632