Feasibility for transvaginal closure supratrigonal vesicovaginal fistula

© JOURNAL OF THE MEDICAL ASSOCIATION OF THAILAND | 2019. Background: Vesicovaginal fistula (VVF) after a gynecologic procedure is often located at the supratrigonal area. This location is difficult to approach via the vagina because of the depth and exposure. Objective: To demonstrate the outcome of...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: P. Sangsoad, P. Ramart
Other Authors: Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University
Format: Article
Published: 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/52014
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Mahidol University
id th-mahidol.52014
record_format dspace
spelling th-mahidol.520142020-01-27T17:16:39Z Feasibility for transvaginal closure supratrigonal vesicovaginal fistula P. Sangsoad P. Ramart Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University Medicine © JOURNAL OF THE MEDICAL ASSOCIATION OF THAILAND | 2019. Background: Vesicovaginal fistula (VVF) after a gynecologic procedure is often located at the supratrigonal area. This location is difficult to approach via the vagina because of the depth and exposure. Objective: To demonstrate the outcome of transvaginal closure supratrigonal VVF. Materials and Methods: The authors retrospectively reviewed non-radiated VVF that was repaired transvaginally between 2015 and 2017. A cure was defined as no clinical urinary incontinence and vaginal discharge. Results: Eleven cases were performed transvaginal closure fistula. The average fistula diameter was 5.1 mm. The peritoneal flap and labial fat were used for tissue interposition in five and three cases respectively. Six cases were cured at mean follow-up of 6.8 (1 to 24) months. Five cases recurred and four of them were performed transvaginal closure. The four cases of recurrence were cured at mean follow-up of 7.0 (3 to 10) months. Two cases used peritoneal flap and others used labial fat for tissue interposition. One had recurrence using one pad per day and did not want to repair. The average operative time for 15 repairs was 82.1 (45 to 120) minute. For all 15 repairs, mean length of stay was 4.3 (2 to 11) days and mean catheter time was 19.1 (10 to 54) days. Conclusion: Supratrigonal VVF could be successfully repaired with transvaginal approach. Overall success rate in first attempt was 54.5%. 2020-01-27T10:16:39Z 2020-01-27T10:16:39Z 2019-01-01 Article Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand. Vol.102, No.12 (2019), 1327-1331 01252208 2-s2.0-85076485838 https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/52014 Mahidol University SCOPUS https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85076485838&origin=inward
institution Mahidol University
building Mahidol University Library
continent Asia
country Thailand
Thailand
content_provider Mahidol University Library
collection Mahidol University Institutional Repository
topic Medicine
spellingShingle Medicine
P. Sangsoad
P. Ramart
Feasibility for transvaginal closure supratrigonal vesicovaginal fistula
description © JOURNAL OF THE MEDICAL ASSOCIATION OF THAILAND | 2019. Background: Vesicovaginal fistula (VVF) after a gynecologic procedure is often located at the supratrigonal area. This location is difficult to approach via the vagina because of the depth and exposure. Objective: To demonstrate the outcome of transvaginal closure supratrigonal VVF. Materials and Methods: The authors retrospectively reviewed non-radiated VVF that was repaired transvaginally between 2015 and 2017. A cure was defined as no clinical urinary incontinence and vaginal discharge. Results: Eleven cases were performed transvaginal closure fistula. The average fistula diameter was 5.1 mm. The peritoneal flap and labial fat were used for tissue interposition in five and three cases respectively. Six cases were cured at mean follow-up of 6.8 (1 to 24) months. Five cases recurred and four of them were performed transvaginal closure. The four cases of recurrence were cured at mean follow-up of 7.0 (3 to 10) months. Two cases used peritoneal flap and others used labial fat for tissue interposition. One had recurrence using one pad per day and did not want to repair. The average operative time for 15 repairs was 82.1 (45 to 120) minute. For all 15 repairs, mean length of stay was 4.3 (2 to 11) days and mean catheter time was 19.1 (10 to 54) days. Conclusion: Supratrigonal VVF could be successfully repaired with transvaginal approach. Overall success rate in first attempt was 54.5%.
author2 Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University
author_facet Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University
P. Sangsoad
P. Ramart
format Article
author P. Sangsoad
P. Ramart
author_sort P. Sangsoad
title Feasibility for transvaginal closure supratrigonal vesicovaginal fistula
title_short Feasibility for transvaginal closure supratrigonal vesicovaginal fistula
title_full Feasibility for transvaginal closure supratrigonal vesicovaginal fistula
title_fullStr Feasibility for transvaginal closure supratrigonal vesicovaginal fistula
title_full_unstemmed Feasibility for transvaginal closure supratrigonal vesicovaginal fistula
title_sort feasibility for transvaginal closure supratrigonal vesicovaginal fistula
publishDate 2020
url https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/52014
_version_ 1763494515191054336