Comparative study of health-related quality of life between colorectal cancer patients with temporary and permanent stoma

© 2019, Siriraj Medical Journal. Objective: To compare the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) between colorectal cancer (CRC) patients with temporary and permanent stoma. Methods: This survey was a cross-sectional study that was conducted on 110 CRC patients living with stoma. A validated Thai v...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Natharom Chutikamo, Rungrawee Navicharern, Varut Lohsiriwat
Other Authors: Chulalongkorn University
Format: Article
Published: 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/52261
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Mahidol University
id th-mahidol.52261
record_format dspace
spelling th-mahidol.522612020-01-27T17:30:33Z Comparative study of health-related quality of life between colorectal cancer patients with temporary and permanent stoma Natharom Chutikamo Rungrawee Navicharern Varut Lohsiriwat Chulalongkorn University Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University Medicine © 2019, Siriraj Medical Journal. Objective: To compare the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) between colorectal cancer (CRC) patients with temporary and permanent stoma. Methods: This survey was a cross-sectional study that was conducted on 110 CRC patients living with stoma. A validated Thai version of Padilla and Grant's HRQOL (as a cancer nursing outcome variable) was used. Enrolled patients must have age between 40-60 years and live with stoma over a period of 3 months. Results: There were 83 patients with temporary stoma and 27 patients with permanent stoma. The majority was male and got married. The common indication for temporary and permanent stoma was low anterior resection and abdominoperineal resection, respectively. Overall mean HRQOL index was not significantly different between groups. There was also no difference in the mean QOL of each domain - namely physical well-being, psychological well-being, body image concerns about stoma, social support concern, and diagnosis/treatment response between those with temporary and permanent stoma. Notably, the domain of body image concern had the lowest QOL index in both groups. Conclusion: Postoperative health-related quality of life was not different between Thai colorectal cancer patients with temporary or permanent stoma. However, the patients with permanent stoma appeared to have non-significant higher score in every domain of health-related quality of life than those with temporary stoma. 2020-01-27T10:30:33Z 2020-01-27T10:30:33Z 2019-01-01 Article Siriraj Medical Journal. Vol.71, No.3 (2019), 196-200 10.33192/Smj.2019.30 22288082 2-s2.0-85067200942 https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/52261 Mahidol University SCOPUS https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85067200942&origin=inward
institution Mahidol University
building Mahidol University Library
continent Asia
country Thailand
Thailand
content_provider Mahidol University Library
collection Mahidol University Institutional Repository
topic Medicine
spellingShingle Medicine
Natharom Chutikamo
Rungrawee Navicharern
Varut Lohsiriwat
Comparative study of health-related quality of life between colorectal cancer patients with temporary and permanent stoma
description © 2019, Siriraj Medical Journal. Objective: To compare the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) between colorectal cancer (CRC) patients with temporary and permanent stoma. Methods: This survey was a cross-sectional study that was conducted on 110 CRC patients living with stoma. A validated Thai version of Padilla and Grant's HRQOL (as a cancer nursing outcome variable) was used. Enrolled patients must have age between 40-60 years and live with stoma over a period of 3 months. Results: There were 83 patients with temporary stoma and 27 patients with permanent stoma. The majority was male and got married. The common indication for temporary and permanent stoma was low anterior resection and abdominoperineal resection, respectively. Overall mean HRQOL index was not significantly different between groups. There was also no difference in the mean QOL of each domain - namely physical well-being, psychological well-being, body image concerns about stoma, social support concern, and diagnosis/treatment response between those with temporary and permanent stoma. Notably, the domain of body image concern had the lowest QOL index in both groups. Conclusion: Postoperative health-related quality of life was not different between Thai colorectal cancer patients with temporary or permanent stoma. However, the patients with permanent stoma appeared to have non-significant higher score in every domain of health-related quality of life than those with temporary stoma.
author2 Chulalongkorn University
author_facet Chulalongkorn University
Natharom Chutikamo
Rungrawee Navicharern
Varut Lohsiriwat
format Article
author Natharom Chutikamo
Rungrawee Navicharern
Varut Lohsiriwat
author_sort Natharom Chutikamo
title Comparative study of health-related quality of life between colorectal cancer patients with temporary and permanent stoma
title_short Comparative study of health-related quality of life between colorectal cancer patients with temporary and permanent stoma
title_full Comparative study of health-related quality of life between colorectal cancer patients with temporary and permanent stoma
title_fullStr Comparative study of health-related quality of life between colorectal cancer patients with temporary and permanent stoma
title_full_unstemmed Comparative study of health-related quality of life between colorectal cancer patients with temporary and permanent stoma
title_sort comparative study of health-related quality of life between colorectal cancer patients with temporary and permanent stoma
publishDate 2020
url https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/52261
_version_ 1763489009350213632