Learning curve for mastery of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: Perspectives from a large Japanese cohort
© 2020 The Authors. JGH Open: An open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology published by Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Foundation and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd. Background and Aim: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a challenging procedure. A dissection s...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Article |
Published: |
2020
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/53873 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Mahidol University |
id |
th-mahidol.53873 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
th-mahidol.538732020-03-26T12:08:17Z Learning curve for mastery of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: Perspectives from a large Japanese cohort Leonardo Zorron Cheng Tao Pu Takeshi Yamamura Masanao Nakamura Masaya Esaki Uayporn Kaosombatwattana Miguel R. Rodriguez Suzanne Edwards Alastair D. Burt Rajvinder Singh Yoshiki Hirooka Mitsuhiro Fujishiro Fujita Health University Nagoya University Hospital Lyell McEwin Health Service Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University The University of Adelaide Nagoya University Medicine © 2020 The Authors. JGH Open: An open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology published by Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Foundation and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd. Background and Aim: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a challenging procedure. A dissection speed of ≥9 cm2/h has been acknowledged as a mark for expertise, alongside a complication rate of ≤5% and en bloc resection rate of ≥90%. However, there is lack of objective information on whether the three measures correlate with each other. This study aims to evaluate the dissection speed, safety, and efficacy of colorectal ESDs performed by experts and trainees. Methods: Consecutive patients undergoing colorectal ESD at a Japanese hospital (2006–2017) were included in a prospectively collected database. Information on patient demographics, proceduralist, and intra-/postprocedure data was retrieved. The primary outcome was the comparison in dissection speed. The secondary outcomes included differences in safety and efficacy. Log-linear regression models adjusted for confounders (e.g. R0 resection) were used to assess the differences in dissection speed. Results: Five hundred ninety procedures (514 patients) performed by 26 endoscopists were analyzed. Experts performed a higher number of difficult lesions (e.g. F2 fibrosis) but achieved higher dissection speed (10.3 vs 6.7 cm2/h). The difference was statistically significant for both unadjusted and adjusted models (P < 0.0001). The en bloc resection rates were similar for both groups (experts = 95.6%; trainees = 94.7%, P = 0.61). Although nonexperts damaged more of the muscularis propria (18.6 vs 12.5%, P = 0.04), this did not translate into a significant difference in perforation (experts = 3.7%; trainees = 6.9%, P = 0.09) or delayed bleeding (experts = 2.9%; trainees = 4.4%, P = 0.34). The dissection speed steadily increased with expertise. Conclusion: Although dissection speed for colorectal ESD was significantly higher for experts, ESDs could be safely and efficaciously performed by ESD trainees. 2020-03-26T05:08:17Z 2020-03-26T05:08:17Z 2020-01-01 Article JGH Open. (2020) 10.1002/jgh3.12298 23979070 2-s2.0-85077974530 https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/53873 Mahidol University SCOPUS https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85077974530&origin=inward |
institution |
Mahidol University |
building |
Mahidol University Library |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Thailand Thailand |
content_provider |
Mahidol University Library |
collection |
Mahidol University Institutional Repository |
topic |
Medicine |
spellingShingle |
Medicine Leonardo Zorron Cheng Tao Pu Takeshi Yamamura Masanao Nakamura Masaya Esaki Uayporn Kaosombatwattana Miguel R. Rodriguez Suzanne Edwards Alastair D. Burt Rajvinder Singh Yoshiki Hirooka Mitsuhiro Fujishiro Learning curve for mastery of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: Perspectives from a large Japanese cohort |
description |
© 2020 The Authors. JGH Open: An open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology published by Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Foundation and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd. Background and Aim: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a challenging procedure. A dissection speed of ≥9 cm2/h has been acknowledged as a mark for expertise, alongside a complication rate of ≤5% and en bloc resection rate of ≥90%. However, there is lack of objective information on whether the three measures correlate with each other. This study aims to evaluate the dissection speed, safety, and efficacy of colorectal ESDs performed by experts and trainees. Methods: Consecutive patients undergoing colorectal ESD at a Japanese hospital (2006–2017) were included in a prospectively collected database. Information on patient demographics, proceduralist, and intra-/postprocedure data was retrieved. The primary outcome was the comparison in dissection speed. The secondary outcomes included differences in safety and efficacy. Log-linear regression models adjusted for confounders (e.g. R0 resection) were used to assess the differences in dissection speed. Results: Five hundred ninety procedures (514 patients) performed by 26 endoscopists were analyzed. Experts performed a higher number of difficult lesions (e.g. F2 fibrosis) but achieved higher dissection speed (10.3 vs 6.7 cm2/h). The difference was statistically significant for both unadjusted and adjusted models (P < 0.0001). The en bloc resection rates were similar for both groups (experts = 95.6%; trainees = 94.7%, P = 0.61). Although nonexperts damaged more of the muscularis propria (18.6 vs 12.5%, P = 0.04), this did not translate into a significant difference in perforation (experts = 3.7%; trainees = 6.9%, P = 0.09) or delayed bleeding (experts = 2.9%; trainees = 4.4%, P = 0.34). The dissection speed steadily increased with expertise. Conclusion: Although dissection speed for colorectal ESD was significantly higher for experts, ESDs could be safely and efficaciously performed by ESD trainees. |
author2 |
Fujita Health University |
author_facet |
Fujita Health University Leonardo Zorron Cheng Tao Pu Takeshi Yamamura Masanao Nakamura Masaya Esaki Uayporn Kaosombatwattana Miguel R. Rodriguez Suzanne Edwards Alastair D. Burt Rajvinder Singh Yoshiki Hirooka Mitsuhiro Fujishiro |
format |
Article |
author |
Leonardo Zorron Cheng Tao Pu Takeshi Yamamura Masanao Nakamura Masaya Esaki Uayporn Kaosombatwattana Miguel R. Rodriguez Suzanne Edwards Alastair D. Burt Rajvinder Singh Yoshiki Hirooka Mitsuhiro Fujishiro |
author_sort |
Leonardo Zorron Cheng Tao Pu |
title |
Learning curve for mastery of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: Perspectives from a large Japanese cohort |
title_short |
Learning curve for mastery of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: Perspectives from a large Japanese cohort |
title_full |
Learning curve for mastery of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: Perspectives from a large Japanese cohort |
title_fullStr |
Learning curve for mastery of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: Perspectives from a large Japanese cohort |
title_full_unstemmed |
Learning curve for mastery of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: Perspectives from a large Japanese cohort |
title_sort |
learning curve for mastery of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: perspectives from a large japanese cohort |
publishDate |
2020 |
url |
https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/53873 |
_version_ |
1763487957693497344 |