How National Context Indirectly Influences Instructional Leadership Implementation: The Case of Israel

© The Author(s) 2020. Purpose: Instructional leadership has been identified as a key responsibility of principals who achieve promising results for school improvement. This study investigated how the national context has influenced the adoption of instructional leadership as a defining role responsi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Haim Shaked, Pascale Benoliel, Philip Hallinger
Other Authors: Mahidol University
Format: Article
Published: 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/58388
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Mahidol University
id th-mahidol.58388
record_format dspace
spelling th-mahidol.583882020-08-25T18:58:23Z How National Context Indirectly Influences Instructional Leadership Implementation: The Case of Israel Haim Shaked Pascale Benoliel Philip Hallinger Mahidol University Bar-Ilan University University of Johannesburg Hemdat Hadarom College of Education Social Sciences © The Author(s) 2020. Purpose: Instructional leadership has been identified as a key responsibility of principals who achieve promising results for school improvement. This study investigated how the national context has influenced the adoption of instructional leadership as a defining role responsibility for Israeli principals. Research Methods: Participants in this qualitative study consisted of a diverse sample of 46 Israeli principals, broadly representative of the larger body of school principals in Israel. Data were collected through both interviews and focus groups. Data analysis proceeded in a four-stage process that involved condensing, coding, categorizing, and theorizing from the interview data. Findings: Findings identified three sociocultural norms that shaped principal adoption of instructional leadership in their role set: low power distance, clan culture, and incomplete identification of principals (and teachers) with their schools’ academic missions. These contextual cohering forces led principals to resist new, formally defined policy expectations of their role as instructional leaders. Implications: This study’s findings reinforce arguments that propose national context as an underserved theoretical lens for understanding differences in principals’ practices across different societies. The findings suggest that despite increasing global acceptance of instructional leadership, its implementation in practice is inevitably shaped by the institutional policies and cultural values of different societies. Even when a “generic” model of instructional or transformational leadership is adopted by policy makers, there will be a process of mutual adaptation during implementation. 2020-08-25T11:58:23Z 2020-08-25T11:58:23Z 2020-01-01 Article Educational Administration Quarterly. (2020) 10.1177/0013161X20944217 15523519 0013161X 2-s2.0-85088473797 https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/58388 Mahidol University SCOPUS https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85088473797&origin=inward
institution Mahidol University
building Mahidol University Library
continent Asia
country Thailand
Thailand
content_provider Mahidol University Library
collection Mahidol University Institutional Repository
topic Social Sciences
spellingShingle Social Sciences
Haim Shaked
Pascale Benoliel
Philip Hallinger
How National Context Indirectly Influences Instructional Leadership Implementation: The Case of Israel
description © The Author(s) 2020. Purpose: Instructional leadership has been identified as a key responsibility of principals who achieve promising results for school improvement. This study investigated how the national context has influenced the adoption of instructional leadership as a defining role responsibility for Israeli principals. Research Methods: Participants in this qualitative study consisted of a diverse sample of 46 Israeli principals, broadly representative of the larger body of school principals in Israel. Data were collected through both interviews and focus groups. Data analysis proceeded in a four-stage process that involved condensing, coding, categorizing, and theorizing from the interview data. Findings: Findings identified three sociocultural norms that shaped principal adoption of instructional leadership in their role set: low power distance, clan culture, and incomplete identification of principals (and teachers) with their schools’ academic missions. These contextual cohering forces led principals to resist new, formally defined policy expectations of their role as instructional leaders. Implications: This study’s findings reinforce arguments that propose national context as an underserved theoretical lens for understanding differences in principals’ practices across different societies. The findings suggest that despite increasing global acceptance of instructional leadership, its implementation in practice is inevitably shaped by the institutional policies and cultural values of different societies. Even when a “generic” model of instructional or transformational leadership is adopted by policy makers, there will be a process of mutual adaptation during implementation.
author2 Mahidol University
author_facet Mahidol University
Haim Shaked
Pascale Benoliel
Philip Hallinger
format Article
author Haim Shaked
Pascale Benoliel
Philip Hallinger
author_sort Haim Shaked
title How National Context Indirectly Influences Instructional Leadership Implementation: The Case of Israel
title_short How National Context Indirectly Influences Instructional Leadership Implementation: The Case of Israel
title_full How National Context Indirectly Influences Instructional Leadership Implementation: The Case of Israel
title_fullStr How National Context Indirectly Influences Instructional Leadership Implementation: The Case of Israel
title_full_unstemmed How National Context Indirectly Influences Instructional Leadership Implementation: The Case of Israel
title_sort how national context indirectly influences instructional leadership implementation: the case of israel
publishDate 2020
url https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/58388
_version_ 1763494289494507520