Two-Antibody Staining Method, A Cost-Saving Strategy for Universal Lynch Syndrome Screening in Endometrial Cancers

Objective: Lynch syndrome is an autosomal dominant disorder that increases the risk of cancers in many sites. In women, endometrial cancer is often a sentinel tumor and thus immunohistochemistry for mismatch repair (MMR) proteins MLH1, MSH2, MSH6 and PMS2 is encouraged as a screening test. To reduce...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Natthakrit Anansitthikorn, Suchanan Hanamornroongruang
Other Authors: Siriraj Hospital
Format: Article
Published: 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/74817
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Mahidol University
id th-mahidol.74817
record_format dspace
spelling th-mahidol.748172022-08-04T11:30:33Z Two-Antibody Staining Method, A Cost-Saving Strategy for Universal Lynch Syndrome Screening in Endometrial Cancers Natthakrit Anansitthikorn Suchanan Hanamornroongruang Siriraj Hospital Medicine Objective: Lynch syndrome is an autosomal dominant disorder that increases the risk of cancers in many sites. In women, endometrial cancer is often a sentinel tumor and thus immunohistochemistry for mismatch repair (MMR) proteins MLH1, MSH2, MSH6 and PMS2 is encouraged as a screening test. To reduce cost, staining for only 2 MMR proteins PMS2 and MSH6 has been proposed. This study aimed to determine whether a 2-antibody staining test is enough to screen for Lynch syndrome in endometrial cancer patients. Materials and Methods: Cases of endometrial carcinoma with immunohistochemistry for 4 MMR proteins were reviewed. Results of immunohistochemistry screening were compared between all four antibodies and only two (PMS2 and MSH6) antibodies. Results: Loss of expression of any MMR proteins was detected in 51 out of 203 cases (25.12%). Twenty-three cases (45%) showed loss of MLH1 and PMS2; 13 cases (25%) showed loss of MSH2 and MSH6; five cases (10%) showed loss of MSH6; seven cases (14%) showed loss of PMS2 and three cases (6%) showed loss of MSH2. The 2-antibody method detected 48 cases (94%) with a MMR deficiency but failed to detect three cases (6%) with an isolate loss of MSH2. The screening results from the 2-antibody method are 98.5% (200/203) in accordance with the original 4-antibody method. Conclusion: The 2-antibody method is a quite effective option to screen for Lynch syndrome in endometrial cancers. However, MSH2 mutations may be missed in a few cases. 2022-08-04T04:30:33Z 2022-08-04T04:30:33Z 2022-02-01 Article Siriraj Medical Journal. Vol.74, No.2 (2022), 108-113 10.33192/Smj.2022.14 22288082 2-s2.0-85125272004 https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/74817 Mahidol University SCOPUS https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85125272004&origin=inward
institution Mahidol University
building Mahidol University Library
continent Asia
country Thailand
Thailand
content_provider Mahidol University Library
collection Mahidol University Institutional Repository
topic Medicine
spellingShingle Medicine
Natthakrit Anansitthikorn
Suchanan Hanamornroongruang
Two-Antibody Staining Method, A Cost-Saving Strategy for Universal Lynch Syndrome Screening in Endometrial Cancers
description Objective: Lynch syndrome is an autosomal dominant disorder that increases the risk of cancers in many sites. In women, endometrial cancer is often a sentinel tumor and thus immunohistochemistry for mismatch repair (MMR) proteins MLH1, MSH2, MSH6 and PMS2 is encouraged as a screening test. To reduce cost, staining for only 2 MMR proteins PMS2 and MSH6 has been proposed. This study aimed to determine whether a 2-antibody staining test is enough to screen for Lynch syndrome in endometrial cancer patients. Materials and Methods: Cases of endometrial carcinoma with immunohistochemistry for 4 MMR proteins were reviewed. Results of immunohistochemistry screening were compared between all four antibodies and only two (PMS2 and MSH6) antibodies. Results: Loss of expression of any MMR proteins was detected in 51 out of 203 cases (25.12%). Twenty-three cases (45%) showed loss of MLH1 and PMS2; 13 cases (25%) showed loss of MSH2 and MSH6; five cases (10%) showed loss of MSH6; seven cases (14%) showed loss of PMS2 and three cases (6%) showed loss of MSH2. The 2-antibody method detected 48 cases (94%) with a MMR deficiency but failed to detect three cases (6%) with an isolate loss of MSH2. The screening results from the 2-antibody method are 98.5% (200/203) in accordance with the original 4-antibody method. Conclusion: The 2-antibody method is a quite effective option to screen for Lynch syndrome in endometrial cancers. However, MSH2 mutations may be missed in a few cases.
author2 Siriraj Hospital
author_facet Siriraj Hospital
Natthakrit Anansitthikorn
Suchanan Hanamornroongruang
format Article
author Natthakrit Anansitthikorn
Suchanan Hanamornroongruang
author_sort Natthakrit Anansitthikorn
title Two-Antibody Staining Method, A Cost-Saving Strategy for Universal Lynch Syndrome Screening in Endometrial Cancers
title_short Two-Antibody Staining Method, A Cost-Saving Strategy for Universal Lynch Syndrome Screening in Endometrial Cancers
title_full Two-Antibody Staining Method, A Cost-Saving Strategy for Universal Lynch Syndrome Screening in Endometrial Cancers
title_fullStr Two-Antibody Staining Method, A Cost-Saving Strategy for Universal Lynch Syndrome Screening in Endometrial Cancers
title_full_unstemmed Two-Antibody Staining Method, A Cost-Saving Strategy for Universal Lynch Syndrome Screening in Endometrial Cancers
title_sort two-antibody staining method, a cost-saving strategy for universal lynch syndrome screening in endometrial cancers
publishDate 2022
url https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/74817
_version_ 1763491212979863552