A comparison of six approaches for measuring utility values among patients with locally advanced cervical cancer

Background: Several instruments are available to measure health utility values. However, limited studies have not yet comprehensively assessed the agreement among these instruments. This study therefore aimed to investigate the performance and agreement of six instruments for utility measures: EQ-5D...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kanyarat Katanyoo, Montarat Thavorncharoensap, Usa Chaikledkaew, Arthorn Riewpaiboon
Other Authors: Vajira Hospital
Format: Article
Published: 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/75184
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Mahidol University
id th-mahidol.75184
record_format dspace
spelling th-mahidol.751842022-08-04T11:41:58Z A comparison of six approaches for measuring utility values among patients with locally advanced cervical cancer Kanyarat Katanyoo Montarat Thavorncharoensap Usa Chaikledkaew Arthorn Riewpaiboon Vajira Hospital Mahidol University Medicine Background: Several instruments are available to measure health utility values. However, limited studies have not yet comprehensively assessed the agreement among these instruments. This study therefore aimed to investigate the performance and agreement of six instruments for utility measures: EQ-5D-3L, EQ-5D-5L (cTTO model), EQ-5D-5L (DCE model), EQ-5D-5L (Hybrid model), TTO, and VAS, among locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) patients in Thailand. Methods: We compared utility scores derived from six approaches using Friedman's test. We also assessed the agreement of utility scores between each pairwise comparison by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland–Altman plot. Results: The mean (SD) utility values derived from six approaches were as follows: 0.755 ± 0.248 (EQ-5D-3L), 0.801 ± 280 (TTO), 0.806 ± 0.156 (VAS), 0.871 ± 0.184 (cTTO model), 0.875 ± 0.168 (Hybrid model), and 0.900 ± 0.142 (DCE model). Significant differences across six approaches were found in Friedman's test. The ICC showed high agreement between EQ-5D-5L and EQ-5D-3L, and very high agreement between all three models of EQ-5D-5L. The Bland-Altman plots showed wide limit of agreement, except the pairwise comparison, between each model of the EQ-5D-5L. Conclusion: TTO, VAS, EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-5L could not be used interchangeably in LACC patients. The impact of using different instruments on economic evaluation findings warrants further investigation. 2022-08-04T04:41:58Z 2022-08-04T04:41:58Z 2022-01-01 Article Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research. Vol.22, No.1 (2022), 107-117 10.1080/14737167.2021.1906224 17448379 14737167 2-s2.0-85103904577 https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/75184 Mahidol University SCOPUS https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85103904577&origin=inward
institution Mahidol University
building Mahidol University Library
continent Asia
country Thailand
Thailand
content_provider Mahidol University Library
collection Mahidol University Institutional Repository
topic Medicine
spellingShingle Medicine
Kanyarat Katanyoo
Montarat Thavorncharoensap
Usa Chaikledkaew
Arthorn Riewpaiboon
A comparison of six approaches for measuring utility values among patients with locally advanced cervical cancer
description Background: Several instruments are available to measure health utility values. However, limited studies have not yet comprehensively assessed the agreement among these instruments. This study therefore aimed to investigate the performance and agreement of six instruments for utility measures: EQ-5D-3L, EQ-5D-5L (cTTO model), EQ-5D-5L (DCE model), EQ-5D-5L (Hybrid model), TTO, and VAS, among locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) patients in Thailand. Methods: We compared utility scores derived from six approaches using Friedman's test. We also assessed the agreement of utility scores between each pairwise comparison by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland–Altman plot. Results: The mean (SD) utility values derived from six approaches were as follows: 0.755 ± 0.248 (EQ-5D-3L), 0.801 ± 280 (TTO), 0.806 ± 0.156 (VAS), 0.871 ± 0.184 (cTTO model), 0.875 ± 0.168 (Hybrid model), and 0.900 ± 0.142 (DCE model). Significant differences across six approaches were found in Friedman's test. The ICC showed high agreement between EQ-5D-5L and EQ-5D-3L, and very high agreement between all three models of EQ-5D-5L. The Bland-Altman plots showed wide limit of agreement, except the pairwise comparison, between each model of the EQ-5D-5L. Conclusion: TTO, VAS, EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-5L could not be used interchangeably in LACC patients. The impact of using different instruments on economic evaluation findings warrants further investigation.
author2 Vajira Hospital
author_facet Vajira Hospital
Kanyarat Katanyoo
Montarat Thavorncharoensap
Usa Chaikledkaew
Arthorn Riewpaiboon
format Article
author Kanyarat Katanyoo
Montarat Thavorncharoensap
Usa Chaikledkaew
Arthorn Riewpaiboon
author_sort Kanyarat Katanyoo
title A comparison of six approaches for measuring utility values among patients with locally advanced cervical cancer
title_short A comparison of six approaches for measuring utility values among patients with locally advanced cervical cancer
title_full A comparison of six approaches for measuring utility values among patients with locally advanced cervical cancer
title_fullStr A comparison of six approaches for measuring utility values among patients with locally advanced cervical cancer
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of six approaches for measuring utility values among patients with locally advanced cervical cancer
title_sort comparison of six approaches for measuring utility values among patients with locally advanced cervical cancer
publishDate 2022
url https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/75184
_version_ 1763498126216265728