How doctors actually (do not) involve families in decisions to continue or discontinue life-sustaining treatment in neonatal, pediatric, and adult intensive care: A qualitative study

Background: Intensive care doctors have to find the right balance between sharing crucial decisions with families of patients on the one hand and not overburdening them on the other hand. This requires a tailored approach instead of a model based approach. Aim: To explore how doctors involve familie...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Aranka Akkermans, J. M.W.J. Lamerichs, M. J. Schultz, T. G.V. Cherpanath, J. B.M. van Woensel, Marc van Heerde, A. H.L.C. van Kaam, M. D. van de Loo, A. M. Stiggelbout, E. M.A. Smets, M. A. de Vos
Other Authors: Leids Universitair Medisch Centrum
Format: Article
Published: 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/77567
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Mahidol University
id th-mahidol.77567
record_format dspace
spelling th-mahidol.775672022-08-04T16:03:36Z How doctors actually (do not) involve families in decisions to continue or discontinue life-sustaining treatment in neonatal, pediatric, and adult intensive care: A qualitative study Aranka Akkermans J. M.W.J. Lamerichs M. J. Schultz T. G.V. Cherpanath J. B.M. van Woensel Marc van Heerde A. H.L.C. van Kaam M. D. van de Loo A. M. Stiggelbout E. M.A. Smets M. A. de Vos Leids Universitair Medisch Centrum Mahidol University Nuffield Department of Medicine Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam Universiteit van Amsterdam Medicine Background: Intensive care doctors have to find the right balance between sharing crucial decisions with families of patients on the one hand and not overburdening them on the other hand. This requires a tailored approach instead of a model based approach. Aim: To explore how doctors involve families in the decision-making process regarding life-sustaining treatment on the neonatal, pediatric, and adult intensive care. Design: Exploratory inductive thematic analysis of 101 audio-recorded conversations. Setting/participants: One hundred four family members (61% female, 39% male) and 71 doctors (60% female, 40% male) of 36 patients (53% female, 47% male) from the neonatal, pediatric, and adult intensive care of a large university medical center participated. Results: We identified eight relevant and distinct communicative behaviors. Doctors’ sequential communicative behaviors either reflected consistent approaches—a shared approach or a physician-driven approach—or reflected vacillating between both approaches. Doctors more often displayed a physician-driven or a vacillating approach than a shared approach, especially in the adult intensive care. Doctors did not verify whether their chosen approach matched the families’ decision-making preferences. Conclusions: Even though tailoring doctors’ communication to families’ preferences is advocated, it does not seem to be integrated into actual practice. To allow for true tailoring, doctors’ awareness regarding the impact of their communicative behaviors is key. Educational initiatives should focus especially on improving doctors’ skills in tactfully exploring families’ decision-making preferences and in mutually sharing knowledge, values, and treatment preferences. 2022-08-04T09:03:36Z 2022-08-04T09:03:36Z 2021-12-01 Article Palliative Medicine. Vol.35, No.10 (2021), 1865-1877 10.1177/02692163211028079 1477030X 02692163 2-s2.0-85108834811 https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/77567 Mahidol University SCOPUS https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85108834811&origin=inward
institution Mahidol University
building Mahidol University Library
continent Asia
country Thailand
Thailand
content_provider Mahidol University Library
collection Mahidol University Institutional Repository
topic Medicine
spellingShingle Medicine
Aranka Akkermans
J. M.W.J. Lamerichs
M. J. Schultz
T. G.V. Cherpanath
J. B.M. van Woensel
Marc van Heerde
A. H.L.C. van Kaam
M. D. van de Loo
A. M. Stiggelbout
E. M.A. Smets
M. A. de Vos
How doctors actually (do not) involve families in decisions to continue or discontinue life-sustaining treatment in neonatal, pediatric, and adult intensive care: A qualitative study
description Background: Intensive care doctors have to find the right balance between sharing crucial decisions with families of patients on the one hand and not overburdening them on the other hand. This requires a tailored approach instead of a model based approach. Aim: To explore how doctors involve families in the decision-making process regarding life-sustaining treatment on the neonatal, pediatric, and adult intensive care. Design: Exploratory inductive thematic analysis of 101 audio-recorded conversations. Setting/participants: One hundred four family members (61% female, 39% male) and 71 doctors (60% female, 40% male) of 36 patients (53% female, 47% male) from the neonatal, pediatric, and adult intensive care of a large university medical center participated. Results: We identified eight relevant and distinct communicative behaviors. Doctors’ sequential communicative behaviors either reflected consistent approaches—a shared approach or a physician-driven approach—or reflected vacillating between both approaches. Doctors more often displayed a physician-driven or a vacillating approach than a shared approach, especially in the adult intensive care. Doctors did not verify whether their chosen approach matched the families’ decision-making preferences. Conclusions: Even though tailoring doctors’ communication to families’ preferences is advocated, it does not seem to be integrated into actual practice. To allow for true tailoring, doctors’ awareness regarding the impact of their communicative behaviors is key. Educational initiatives should focus especially on improving doctors’ skills in tactfully exploring families’ decision-making preferences and in mutually sharing knowledge, values, and treatment preferences.
author2 Leids Universitair Medisch Centrum
author_facet Leids Universitair Medisch Centrum
Aranka Akkermans
J. M.W.J. Lamerichs
M. J. Schultz
T. G.V. Cherpanath
J. B.M. van Woensel
Marc van Heerde
A. H.L.C. van Kaam
M. D. van de Loo
A. M. Stiggelbout
E. M.A. Smets
M. A. de Vos
format Article
author Aranka Akkermans
J. M.W.J. Lamerichs
M. J. Schultz
T. G.V. Cherpanath
J. B.M. van Woensel
Marc van Heerde
A. H.L.C. van Kaam
M. D. van de Loo
A. M. Stiggelbout
E. M.A. Smets
M. A. de Vos
author_sort Aranka Akkermans
title How doctors actually (do not) involve families in decisions to continue or discontinue life-sustaining treatment in neonatal, pediatric, and adult intensive care: A qualitative study
title_short How doctors actually (do not) involve families in decisions to continue or discontinue life-sustaining treatment in neonatal, pediatric, and adult intensive care: A qualitative study
title_full How doctors actually (do not) involve families in decisions to continue or discontinue life-sustaining treatment in neonatal, pediatric, and adult intensive care: A qualitative study
title_fullStr How doctors actually (do not) involve families in decisions to continue or discontinue life-sustaining treatment in neonatal, pediatric, and adult intensive care: A qualitative study
title_full_unstemmed How doctors actually (do not) involve families in decisions to continue or discontinue life-sustaining treatment in neonatal, pediatric, and adult intensive care: A qualitative study
title_sort how doctors actually (do not) involve families in decisions to continue or discontinue life-sustaining treatment in neonatal, pediatric, and adult intensive care: a qualitative study
publishDate 2022
url https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/77567
_version_ 1763492004553031680