Comparing the ICD-11 chronic pain classification with ICD-10: how can the new coding system make chronic pain visible? A study in a tertiary care pain clinic setting

ABSTRACT: Pain is a frequent reason for patients to ask for medical services. However, systematic information about the extent and impact of pain, especially in developing countries, has not been available up to now. We evaluated whether the 11th edition of the International Statistical Classificati...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nantthasorn Zinboonyahgoon, Choopong Luansritisakul, Sarasate Eiamtanasate, Sirikan Duangburong, Virachat Sanansilp, Beatrice Korwisi, Antonia Barke, Winfried Rief, Rolf Detlef Treede
Other Authors: Siriraj Hospital
Format: Article
Published: 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/78080
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Mahidol University
id th-mahidol.78080
record_format dspace
spelling th-mahidol.780802022-08-04T18:15:10Z Comparing the ICD-11 chronic pain classification with ICD-10: how can the new coding system make chronic pain visible? A study in a tertiary care pain clinic setting Nantthasorn Zinboonyahgoon Choopong Luansritisakul Sarasate Eiamtanasate Sirikan Duangburong Virachat Sanansilp Beatrice Korwisi Antonia Barke Winfried Rief Rolf Detlef Treede Siriraj Hospital Universität Heidelberg Philipps-Universität Marburg Katholische Universität Eichstätt - Ingolstadt Medicine Neuroscience ABSTRACT: Pain is a frequent reason for patients to ask for medical services. However, systematic information about the extent and impact of pain, especially in developing countries, has not been available up to now. We evaluated whether the 11th edition of the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (ICD) can fill this gap by coding all electronic out-patient medical records of the pain clinic at Siriraj Hospital in Thailand in 2019 (8714 visits), using the ICD-10 and ICD-11 browsers referenced on the WHO websites. The 3 most frequent pain-related codes in ICD-10 were R52.2 "other chronic pain" (29%), M54.5 "low back pain" (18%), and M79.6 "pain in limb" (13%). In ICD-11, the 3 most frequent codes were MG30.31 "chronic secondary musculoskeletal pain associated with structural changes" (28%), MG30.51 "chronic peripheral neuropathic pain" (26%), and MG30.10 "chronic cancer pain" (23%). Thus, using the currently valid ICD-10 system, roughly one-third of patient encounters were coded as "other chronic pain," and the next 2 were specifying the pain region rather than any underlying cause. By contrast, ICD-11 coding of the same patients identified underlying causes (bones and joints, somatosensory nervous system, cancer, or surgery), which provide guidance towards differential patient management. In our pain clinic, most patients suffered from chronic cancer pain, chronic neuropathic pain, and chronic secondary musculoskeletal pain, which were poorly defined or nonexistent in the current ICD-10 coding system. Compared with the ICD-10, the ICD-11 provides more detailed diagnostic categories and is more informative for clinical use, research, and resource allocation for pain-related conditions. 2022-08-04T09:19:49Z 2022-08-04T09:19:49Z 2021-07-01 Article Pain. Vol.162, No.7 (2021), 1995-2001 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002196 18726623 2-s2.0-85108387023 https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/78080 Mahidol University SCOPUS https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85108387023&origin=inward
institution Mahidol University
building Mahidol University Library
continent Asia
country Thailand
Thailand
content_provider Mahidol University Library
collection Mahidol University Institutional Repository
topic Medicine
Neuroscience
spellingShingle Medicine
Neuroscience
Nantthasorn Zinboonyahgoon
Choopong Luansritisakul
Sarasate Eiamtanasate
Sirikan Duangburong
Virachat Sanansilp
Beatrice Korwisi
Antonia Barke
Winfried Rief
Rolf Detlef Treede
Comparing the ICD-11 chronic pain classification with ICD-10: how can the new coding system make chronic pain visible? A study in a tertiary care pain clinic setting
description ABSTRACT: Pain is a frequent reason for patients to ask for medical services. However, systematic information about the extent and impact of pain, especially in developing countries, has not been available up to now. We evaluated whether the 11th edition of the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (ICD) can fill this gap by coding all electronic out-patient medical records of the pain clinic at Siriraj Hospital in Thailand in 2019 (8714 visits), using the ICD-10 and ICD-11 browsers referenced on the WHO websites. The 3 most frequent pain-related codes in ICD-10 were R52.2 "other chronic pain" (29%), M54.5 "low back pain" (18%), and M79.6 "pain in limb" (13%). In ICD-11, the 3 most frequent codes were MG30.31 "chronic secondary musculoskeletal pain associated with structural changes" (28%), MG30.51 "chronic peripheral neuropathic pain" (26%), and MG30.10 "chronic cancer pain" (23%). Thus, using the currently valid ICD-10 system, roughly one-third of patient encounters were coded as "other chronic pain," and the next 2 were specifying the pain region rather than any underlying cause. By contrast, ICD-11 coding of the same patients identified underlying causes (bones and joints, somatosensory nervous system, cancer, or surgery), which provide guidance towards differential patient management. In our pain clinic, most patients suffered from chronic cancer pain, chronic neuropathic pain, and chronic secondary musculoskeletal pain, which were poorly defined or nonexistent in the current ICD-10 coding system. Compared with the ICD-10, the ICD-11 provides more detailed diagnostic categories and is more informative for clinical use, research, and resource allocation for pain-related conditions.
author2 Siriraj Hospital
author_facet Siriraj Hospital
Nantthasorn Zinboonyahgoon
Choopong Luansritisakul
Sarasate Eiamtanasate
Sirikan Duangburong
Virachat Sanansilp
Beatrice Korwisi
Antonia Barke
Winfried Rief
Rolf Detlef Treede
format Article
author Nantthasorn Zinboonyahgoon
Choopong Luansritisakul
Sarasate Eiamtanasate
Sirikan Duangburong
Virachat Sanansilp
Beatrice Korwisi
Antonia Barke
Winfried Rief
Rolf Detlef Treede
author_sort Nantthasorn Zinboonyahgoon
title Comparing the ICD-11 chronic pain classification with ICD-10: how can the new coding system make chronic pain visible? A study in a tertiary care pain clinic setting
title_short Comparing the ICD-11 chronic pain classification with ICD-10: how can the new coding system make chronic pain visible? A study in a tertiary care pain clinic setting
title_full Comparing the ICD-11 chronic pain classification with ICD-10: how can the new coding system make chronic pain visible? A study in a tertiary care pain clinic setting
title_fullStr Comparing the ICD-11 chronic pain classification with ICD-10: how can the new coding system make chronic pain visible? A study in a tertiary care pain clinic setting
title_full_unstemmed Comparing the ICD-11 chronic pain classification with ICD-10: how can the new coding system make chronic pain visible? A study in a tertiary care pain clinic setting
title_sort comparing the icd-11 chronic pain classification with icd-10: how can the new coding system make chronic pain visible? a study in a tertiary care pain clinic setting
publishDate 2022
url https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/78080
_version_ 1763488148713635840