Machine learning-based patient classification system for adults with stroke: A systematic review
Objective: To evaluate the existing evidence of a machine learning-based classification system that stratifies patients with stroke. Methods: The authors carried out a systematic review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) recommendations for a re...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Review |
Published: |
2022
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/78546 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Mahidol University |
id |
th-mahidol.78546 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
th-mahidol.785462022-08-04T18:04:07Z Machine learning-based patient classification system for adults with stroke: A systematic review Suebsarn Ruksakulpiwat Witchuda Thongking Wendie Zhou Chitchanok Benjasirisan Lalipat Phianhasin Nicholas K. Schiltz Smit Brahmbhatt Harbin Medical University Mahidol University Shibaura Institute of Technology Case Western Reserve University Medicine Objective: To evaluate the existing evidence of a machine learning-based classification system that stratifies patients with stroke. Methods: The authors carried out a systematic review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) recommendations for a review article. PubMed, MEDLINE, Web of Science, and CINAHL Plus Full Text were searched from January 2015 to February 2021. Results: There are twelve studies included in this systematic review. Fifteen algorithms were used in the included studies. The most common forms of machine learning (ML) used to classify stroke patients were the support vector machine (SVM) (n = 8 studies), followed by random forest (RF) (n = 7 studies), decision tree (DT) (n = 4 studies), gradient boosting (GB) (n = 4 studies), neural networks (NNs) (n = 3 studies), deep learning (n = 2 studies), and k-nearest neighbor (k-NN) (n = 2 studies), respectively. Forty-four features of inputs were used in the included studies, and age and gender are the most common features in the ML model. Discussion: There is no single algorithm that performed better or worse than all others at classifying patients with stroke, in part because different input data require different algorithms to achieve optimal outcomes. 2022-08-04T11:04:07Z 2022-08-04T11:04:07Z 2021-01-01 Review Chronic Illness. (2021) 10.1177/17423953211067435 17459206 17423953 2-s2.0-85121364309 https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/78546 Mahidol University SCOPUS https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85121364309&origin=inward |
institution |
Mahidol University |
building |
Mahidol University Library |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Thailand Thailand |
content_provider |
Mahidol University Library |
collection |
Mahidol University Institutional Repository |
topic |
Medicine |
spellingShingle |
Medicine Suebsarn Ruksakulpiwat Witchuda Thongking Wendie Zhou Chitchanok Benjasirisan Lalipat Phianhasin Nicholas K. Schiltz Smit Brahmbhatt Machine learning-based patient classification system for adults with stroke: A systematic review |
description |
Objective: To evaluate the existing evidence of a machine learning-based classification system that stratifies patients with stroke. Methods: The authors carried out a systematic review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) recommendations for a review article. PubMed, MEDLINE, Web of Science, and CINAHL Plus Full Text were searched from January 2015 to February 2021. Results: There are twelve studies included in this systematic review. Fifteen algorithms were used in the included studies. The most common forms of machine learning (ML) used to classify stroke patients were the support vector machine (SVM) (n = 8 studies), followed by random forest (RF) (n = 7 studies), decision tree (DT) (n = 4 studies), gradient boosting (GB) (n = 4 studies), neural networks (NNs) (n = 3 studies), deep learning (n = 2 studies), and k-nearest neighbor (k-NN) (n = 2 studies), respectively. Forty-four features of inputs were used in the included studies, and age and gender are the most common features in the ML model. Discussion: There is no single algorithm that performed better or worse than all others at classifying patients with stroke, in part because different input data require different algorithms to achieve optimal outcomes. |
author2 |
Harbin Medical University |
author_facet |
Harbin Medical University Suebsarn Ruksakulpiwat Witchuda Thongking Wendie Zhou Chitchanok Benjasirisan Lalipat Phianhasin Nicholas K. Schiltz Smit Brahmbhatt |
format |
Review |
author |
Suebsarn Ruksakulpiwat Witchuda Thongking Wendie Zhou Chitchanok Benjasirisan Lalipat Phianhasin Nicholas K. Schiltz Smit Brahmbhatt |
author_sort |
Suebsarn Ruksakulpiwat |
title |
Machine learning-based patient classification system for adults with stroke: A systematic review |
title_short |
Machine learning-based patient classification system for adults with stroke: A systematic review |
title_full |
Machine learning-based patient classification system for adults with stroke: A systematic review |
title_fullStr |
Machine learning-based patient classification system for adults with stroke: A systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed |
Machine learning-based patient classification system for adults with stroke: A systematic review |
title_sort |
machine learning-based patient classification system for adults with stroke: a systematic review |
publishDate |
2022 |
url |
https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/78546 |
_version_ |
1763489075010994176 |