Machine learning-based patient classification system for adults with stroke: A systematic review

Objective: To evaluate the existing evidence of a machine learning-based classification system that stratifies patients with stroke. Methods: The authors carried out a systematic review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) recommendations for a re...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Suebsarn Ruksakulpiwat, Witchuda Thongking, Wendie Zhou, Chitchanok Benjasirisan, Lalipat Phianhasin, Nicholas K. Schiltz, Smit Brahmbhatt
Other Authors: Harbin Medical University
Format: Review
Published: 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/78546
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Mahidol University
id th-mahidol.78546
record_format dspace
spelling th-mahidol.785462022-08-04T18:04:07Z Machine learning-based patient classification system for adults with stroke: A systematic review Suebsarn Ruksakulpiwat Witchuda Thongking Wendie Zhou Chitchanok Benjasirisan Lalipat Phianhasin Nicholas K. Schiltz Smit Brahmbhatt Harbin Medical University Mahidol University Shibaura Institute of Technology Case Western Reserve University Medicine Objective: To evaluate the existing evidence of a machine learning-based classification system that stratifies patients with stroke. Methods: The authors carried out a systematic review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) recommendations for a review article. PubMed, MEDLINE, Web of Science, and CINAHL Plus Full Text were searched from January 2015 to February 2021. Results: There are twelve studies included in this systematic review. Fifteen algorithms were used in the included studies. The most common forms of machine learning (ML) used to classify stroke patients were the support vector machine (SVM) (n = 8 studies), followed by random forest (RF) (n = 7 studies), decision tree (DT) (n = 4 studies), gradient boosting (GB) (n = 4 studies), neural networks (NNs) (n = 3 studies), deep learning (n = 2 studies), and k-nearest neighbor (k-NN) (n = 2 studies), respectively. Forty-four features of inputs were used in the included studies, and age and gender are the most common features in the ML model. Discussion: There is no single algorithm that performed better or worse than all others at classifying patients with stroke, in part because different input data require different algorithms to achieve optimal outcomes. 2022-08-04T11:04:07Z 2022-08-04T11:04:07Z 2021-01-01 Review Chronic Illness. (2021) 10.1177/17423953211067435 17459206 17423953 2-s2.0-85121364309 https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/78546 Mahidol University SCOPUS https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85121364309&origin=inward
institution Mahidol University
building Mahidol University Library
continent Asia
country Thailand
Thailand
content_provider Mahidol University Library
collection Mahidol University Institutional Repository
topic Medicine
spellingShingle Medicine
Suebsarn Ruksakulpiwat
Witchuda Thongking
Wendie Zhou
Chitchanok Benjasirisan
Lalipat Phianhasin
Nicholas K. Schiltz
Smit Brahmbhatt
Machine learning-based patient classification system for adults with stroke: A systematic review
description Objective: To evaluate the existing evidence of a machine learning-based classification system that stratifies patients with stroke. Methods: The authors carried out a systematic review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) recommendations for a review article. PubMed, MEDLINE, Web of Science, and CINAHL Plus Full Text were searched from January 2015 to February 2021. Results: There are twelve studies included in this systematic review. Fifteen algorithms were used in the included studies. The most common forms of machine learning (ML) used to classify stroke patients were the support vector machine (SVM) (n = 8 studies), followed by random forest (RF) (n = 7 studies), decision tree (DT) (n = 4 studies), gradient boosting (GB) (n = 4 studies), neural networks (NNs) (n = 3 studies), deep learning (n = 2 studies), and k-nearest neighbor (k-NN) (n = 2 studies), respectively. Forty-four features of inputs were used in the included studies, and age and gender are the most common features in the ML model. Discussion: There is no single algorithm that performed better or worse than all others at classifying patients with stroke, in part because different input data require different algorithms to achieve optimal outcomes.
author2 Harbin Medical University
author_facet Harbin Medical University
Suebsarn Ruksakulpiwat
Witchuda Thongking
Wendie Zhou
Chitchanok Benjasirisan
Lalipat Phianhasin
Nicholas K. Schiltz
Smit Brahmbhatt
format Review
author Suebsarn Ruksakulpiwat
Witchuda Thongking
Wendie Zhou
Chitchanok Benjasirisan
Lalipat Phianhasin
Nicholas K. Schiltz
Smit Brahmbhatt
author_sort Suebsarn Ruksakulpiwat
title Machine learning-based patient classification system for adults with stroke: A systematic review
title_short Machine learning-based patient classification system for adults with stroke: A systematic review
title_full Machine learning-based patient classification system for adults with stroke: A systematic review
title_fullStr Machine learning-based patient classification system for adults with stroke: A systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Machine learning-based patient classification system for adults with stroke: A systematic review
title_sort machine learning-based patient classification system for adults with stroke: a systematic review
publishDate 2022
url https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/78546
_version_ 1763489075010994176