Use of handheld versus standard ultrasound devices in ultrasound rotation at the emergency department

BACKGROUND: Recently, handheld ultrasound equipment has come to replace standard machines in the training of emergency medicine residents. However, there have been few studies examining how this change has affected medical education. AIM: We aimed to compare standard and handheld ultrasound machines...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kamonwon Ienghong, Kotchakorn Jumroenketpratheep, Somsak Tiamkao, Korakot Apiratwarakul
Other Authors: Khon Kaen University
Format: Article
Published: 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/78822
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Mahidol University
id th-mahidol.78822
record_format dspace
spelling th-mahidol.788222022-08-04T18:11:47Z Use of handheld versus standard ultrasound devices in ultrasound rotation at the emergency department Kamonwon Ienghong Kotchakorn Jumroenketpratheep Somsak Tiamkao Korakot Apiratwarakul Khon Kaen University Mahidol University Medicine BACKGROUND: Recently, handheld ultrasound equipment has come to replace standard machines in the training of emergency medicine residents. However, there have been few studies examining how this change has affected medical education. AIM: We aimed to compare standard and handheld ultrasound machines as educational tools in the emergency medicine residency program. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey of 17 emergency medicine residents at Srinagarind Hospital emergency department were trained to use point-of-care ultrasound and provided with handheld ultrasound devices during their 2-week ultrasound rotations, which took place between July 2019 and May 2020. Participants were given a 25-question survey comparing their learning experiences with standard versus handheld ultrasound machines. Data were analyzed using an independent sample t-test, and p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: The response rate was 100%. At the baseline survey, most participants rated their learning experience as greater than 4 out of 5 with both ultrasound devices. They rated the learning experience with the handheld device as being more enjoyable and accessible but not to a statistically significant extent. There were also no significant differences in participants’ ratings of image quality or the ease of obtaining images. However, they rated the handheld device as being more useful and convenient (p < 0.001 and 0.034, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The handheld ultrasound machine is useful in the training of emergency medicine residents. Further studies should be conducted to evaluate residents’ competency in using these devices. 2022-08-04T11:11:47Z 2022-08-04T11:11:47Z 2021-01-01 Article Open Access Macedonian Journal of Medical Sciences. Vol.9, No.E (2021), 29-32 10.3889/oamjms.2021.5528 18579655 2-s2.0-85100331707 https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/78822 Mahidol University SCOPUS https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85100331707&origin=inward
institution Mahidol University
building Mahidol University Library
continent Asia
country Thailand
Thailand
content_provider Mahidol University Library
collection Mahidol University Institutional Repository
topic Medicine
spellingShingle Medicine
Kamonwon Ienghong
Kotchakorn Jumroenketpratheep
Somsak Tiamkao
Korakot Apiratwarakul
Use of handheld versus standard ultrasound devices in ultrasound rotation at the emergency department
description BACKGROUND: Recently, handheld ultrasound equipment has come to replace standard machines in the training of emergency medicine residents. However, there have been few studies examining how this change has affected medical education. AIM: We aimed to compare standard and handheld ultrasound machines as educational tools in the emergency medicine residency program. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey of 17 emergency medicine residents at Srinagarind Hospital emergency department were trained to use point-of-care ultrasound and provided with handheld ultrasound devices during their 2-week ultrasound rotations, which took place between July 2019 and May 2020. Participants were given a 25-question survey comparing their learning experiences with standard versus handheld ultrasound machines. Data were analyzed using an independent sample t-test, and p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: The response rate was 100%. At the baseline survey, most participants rated their learning experience as greater than 4 out of 5 with both ultrasound devices. They rated the learning experience with the handheld device as being more enjoyable and accessible but not to a statistically significant extent. There were also no significant differences in participants’ ratings of image quality or the ease of obtaining images. However, they rated the handheld device as being more useful and convenient (p < 0.001 and 0.034, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The handheld ultrasound machine is useful in the training of emergency medicine residents. Further studies should be conducted to evaluate residents’ competency in using these devices.
author2 Khon Kaen University
author_facet Khon Kaen University
Kamonwon Ienghong
Kotchakorn Jumroenketpratheep
Somsak Tiamkao
Korakot Apiratwarakul
format Article
author Kamonwon Ienghong
Kotchakorn Jumroenketpratheep
Somsak Tiamkao
Korakot Apiratwarakul
author_sort Kamonwon Ienghong
title Use of handheld versus standard ultrasound devices in ultrasound rotation at the emergency department
title_short Use of handheld versus standard ultrasound devices in ultrasound rotation at the emergency department
title_full Use of handheld versus standard ultrasound devices in ultrasound rotation at the emergency department
title_fullStr Use of handheld versus standard ultrasound devices in ultrasound rotation at the emergency department
title_full_unstemmed Use of handheld versus standard ultrasound devices in ultrasound rotation at the emergency department
title_sort use of handheld versus standard ultrasound devices in ultrasound rotation at the emergency department
publishDate 2022
url https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/78822
_version_ 1763496799267454976