Attitudes of indonesian medical doctors and medical students toward genome editing

Purpose: This study aimed to measure the attitudes of Indonesian medical doctors and students toward new technology in genome editing. Materials and Methods: Online questionnaires regarding attitudes toward genome editing on health and non-health conditions, both in somatic cells and embryo, were di...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Safira Nur Izzah, Dimas Setyanto, Nurina Hasanatuludhhiyah, Danti Nur Indiastuti, Zamal Nasution, Annette D’Arqom
Other Authors: Universitas Airlangga
Format: Article
Published: 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/78929
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Mahidol University
Description
Summary:Purpose: This study aimed to measure the attitudes of Indonesian medical doctors and students toward new technology in genome editing. Materials and Methods: Online questionnaires regarding attitudes toward genome editing on health and non-health conditions, both in somatic cells and embryo, were distributed through researcher networks, email and social media specific to medical doctors and students. The data of 1055 valid questionnaires were processed; descriptive and association analyses between sociodemographic factors and attitudes toward genome editing were performed. Email in-depth interview was performed to explore the respondents’ answers. Results: The results showed that Indonesian medical doctors’ and students’ knowledge of genome editing was limited and correlated with gender, place of residence, religion, education, marital status, childbearing and experience abroad. More than half of respondents supported genome editing for the treatment of fatal and debilitating diseases both in somatic cells and embryos, implying their consent to edited gene inheritance. However, this approval decreased when applied to non-health-related aspects, such as physical appearance, intelligence and strength. Factors affecting their attitudes toward genome editing included their status as medical doctors or students, gender, age, education, religion, economic status and place of residence. Conclusion: Increasing knowledge and awareness of Indonesian medical doctors and students regarding genome editing is important. Even though its application in health-related matter was supported by a majority of the respondents, discussion from ethical and religious perspectives is necessary to ensure the acceptance.