Scanning electron microscope analysis of working ends of standard and modified Gracey curettes

Context: Gracey curettes are the most frequently used manual instruments in periodontal treatments. Aim: This study aimed to evaluate morphology of working ends of standard and modified Gracey curettes no. 1-2. Materials and Methods: Using scanning electron microscopy, four batches of unused standar...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Nimmanon V.
Other Authors: Mahidol University
Format: Article
Published: 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/84447
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Mahidol University
id th-mahidol.84447
record_format dspace
spelling th-mahidol.844472023-06-19T00:06:01Z Scanning electron microscope analysis of working ends of standard and modified Gracey curettes Nimmanon V. Mahidol University Dentistry Context: Gracey curettes are the most frequently used manual instruments in periodontal treatments. Aim: This study aimed to evaluate morphology of working ends of standard and modified Gracey curettes no. 1-2. Materials and Methods: Using scanning electron microscopy, four batches of unused standard curettes from seven manufacturers and modified curettes from 6 manufacturers were investigated for blade length, blade width, blade thickness, toe morphology, surface roughness, and cutting-edge morphology. Results: Working ends of the standard Gracey curettes were longer than the modified ones, with mean lengths of 5.65 ± 0.68 and 4.42 ± 0.82 mm, respectively. However, both standard and modified Gracey curettes had comparable widths and thicknesses, with the mean width of 0.86 mm and the mean thickness of 0.71 mm. Most samples had acceptably symmetrical toes, except those from three manufacturers which had unacceptable toes with angulations. Moreover, only two manufacturers produced curettes with smooth blades on all their surfaces. In addition, sharp or functional wire edges were seen in cutting edges of curettes from three manufacturers. Conclusions: Working ends of standard and modified Gracey curettes could have different morphological features if they were from different manufacturers or different batches. It is suggested that dentists or dental hygienists make a purchase decision based on their knowledge on morphology of a good curette in relation to its intended use in dental practice, rather than their familiarity or the curette's price. Furthermore, the curette needs to be examined using a widely available magnifying device when possible. 2023-06-18T17:06:01Z 2023-06-18T17:06:01Z 2022-05-01 Article Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology Vol.26 No.3 (2022) , 213-218 10.4103/jisp.jisp-848-20 09751580 0972124X 2-s2.0-85130238443 https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/84447 SCOPUS
institution Mahidol University
building Mahidol University Library
continent Asia
country Thailand
Thailand
content_provider Mahidol University Library
collection Mahidol University Institutional Repository
topic Dentistry
spellingShingle Dentistry
Nimmanon V.
Scanning electron microscope analysis of working ends of standard and modified Gracey curettes
description Context: Gracey curettes are the most frequently used manual instruments in periodontal treatments. Aim: This study aimed to evaluate morphology of working ends of standard and modified Gracey curettes no. 1-2. Materials and Methods: Using scanning electron microscopy, four batches of unused standard curettes from seven manufacturers and modified curettes from 6 manufacturers were investigated for blade length, blade width, blade thickness, toe morphology, surface roughness, and cutting-edge morphology. Results: Working ends of the standard Gracey curettes were longer than the modified ones, with mean lengths of 5.65 ± 0.68 and 4.42 ± 0.82 mm, respectively. However, both standard and modified Gracey curettes had comparable widths and thicknesses, with the mean width of 0.86 mm and the mean thickness of 0.71 mm. Most samples had acceptably symmetrical toes, except those from three manufacturers which had unacceptable toes with angulations. Moreover, only two manufacturers produced curettes with smooth blades on all their surfaces. In addition, sharp or functional wire edges were seen in cutting edges of curettes from three manufacturers. Conclusions: Working ends of standard and modified Gracey curettes could have different morphological features if they were from different manufacturers or different batches. It is suggested that dentists or dental hygienists make a purchase decision based on their knowledge on morphology of a good curette in relation to its intended use in dental practice, rather than their familiarity or the curette's price. Furthermore, the curette needs to be examined using a widely available magnifying device when possible.
author2 Mahidol University
author_facet Mahidol University
Nimmanon V.
format Article
author Nimmanon V.
author_sort Nimmanon V.
title Scanning electron microscope analysis of working ends of standard and modified Gracey curettes
title_short Scanning electron microscope analysis of working ends of standard and modified Gracey curettes
title_full Scanning electron microscope analysis of working ends of standard and modified Gracey curettes
title_fullStr Scanning electron microscope analysis of working ends of standard and modified Gracey curettes
title_full_unstemmed Scanning electron microscope analysis of working ends of standard and modified Gracey curettes
title_sort scanning electron microscope analysis of working ends of standard and modified gracey curettes
publishDate 2023
url https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/84447
_version_ 1781414387708329984