Bond Durability of a Repaired Resin Composite Using a Universal Adhesive and Different Surface Treatments

Purpose: To evaluate the long-term effect of different surface treatments on the repair microtensile bond strength (μTBS) of resin composite using a universal adhesive.Materials and Methods: Thirty-six resin composite blocks were fabricated and aged in 37°C distilled water for 1 month. The blocks we...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Chuenweravanich J.
Other Authors: Mahidol University
Format: Article
Published: 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/84480
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Mahidol University
id th-mahidol.84480
record_format dspace
spelling th-mahidol.844802023-06-19T00:06:36Z Bond Durability of a Repaired Resin Composite Using a Universal Adhesive and Different Surface Treatments Chuenweravanich J. Mahidol University Dentistry Purpose: To evaluate the long-term effect of different surface treatments on the repair microtensile bond strength (μTBS) of resin composite using a universal adhesive.Materials and Methods: Thirty-six resin composite blocks were fabricated and aged in 37°C distilled water for 1 month. The blocks were randomly assigned to different surface treatments: no treatment (control); diamond bur grinding (D); diamond bur + phosphoric acid cleaning (DP); diamond bur + silane application (DSi); diamond bur + phosphoric acid + silane (DPSi); and grit blasting with 50 μm Al2O3 particles + phosphoric acid + silane (APSi). Thereafter, Single Bond Universal adhesive was applied and repaired with the same composite. Composite-composite stick-shaped specimens were fabricated and subjected to the μTBS test either after 37°C water storage for 24 h or thermocycling for 10,000 cycles. Roughness of different surface-prepared specimens was measured by profilometer. Data were analysed using ANOVA and Duncan’s post-hoc test (α = 0.05). Failure mode and micromorphology of different surface-prepared specimens were observed with SEM and EDS analysis.Results: The highest μTBS was found in DPSi group at 24 h, and was significantly higher than others. The bond strengths in all thermocycled groups were significantly lower than those measured at 24 h. The highest μTBS was also found in the DPSi group, but this did not significantly differ from the DSi group.Conclusion: Thermocycling significantly reduced the repair bond strength. Diamond bur roughening with application of silane and universal adhesive yielded the highest repair bond strength for the aged resin composite 2023-06-18T17:06:36Z 2023-06-18T17:06:36Z 2022-01-01 Article Journal of Adhesive Dentistry Vol.24 No.1 (2022) , 67-76 10.3290/j.jad.b2288293 17579988 14615185 35262303 2-s2.0-85126077475 https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/84480 SCOPUS
institution Mahidol University
building Mahidol University Library
continent Asia
country Thailand
Thailand
content_provider Mahidol University Library
collection Mahidol University Institutional Repository
topic Dentistry
spellingShingle Dentistry
Chuenweravanich J.
Bond Durability of a Repaired Resin Composite Using a Universal Adhesive and Different Surface Treatments
description Purpose: To evaluate the long-term effect of different surface treatments on the repair microtensile bond strength (μTBS) of resin composite using a universal adhesive.Materials and Methods: Thirty-six resin composite blocks were fabricated and aged in 37°C distilled water for 1 month. The blocks were randomly assigned to different surface treatments: no treatment (control); diamond bur grinding (D); diamond bur + phosphoric acid cleaning (DP); diamond bur + silane application (DSi); diamond bur + phosphoric acid + silane (DPSi); and grit blasting with 50 μm Al2O3 particles + phosphoric acid + silane (APSi). Thereafter, Single Bond Universal adhesive was applied and repaired with the same composite. Composite-composite stick-shaped specimens were fabricated and subjected to the μTBS test either after 37°C water storage for 24 h or thermocycling for 10,000 cycles. Roughness of different surface-prepared specimens was measured by profilometer. Data were analysed using ANOVA and Duncan’s post-hoc test (α = 0.05). Failure mode and micromorphology of different surface-prepared specimens were observed with SEM and EDS analysis.Results: The highest μTBS was found in DPSi group at 24 h, and was significantly higher than others. The bond strengths in all thermocycled groups were significantly lower than those measured at 24 h. The highest μTBS was also found in the DPSi group, but this did not significantly differ from the DSi group.Conclusion: Thermocycling significantly reduced the repair bond strength. Diamond bur roughening with application of silane and universal adhesive yielded the highest repair bond strength for the aged resin composite
author2 Mahidol University
author_facet Mahidol University
Chuenweravanich J.
format Article
author Chuenweravanich J.
author_sort Chuenweravanich J.
title Bond Durability of a Repaired Resin Composite Using a Universal Adhesive and Different Surface Treatments
title_short Bond Durability of a Repaired Resin Composite Using a Universal Adhesive and Different Surface Treatments
title_full Bond Durability of a Repaired Resin Composite Using a Universal Adhesive and Different Surface Treatments
title_fullStr Bond Durability of a Repaired Resin Composite Using a Universal Adhesive and Different Surface Treatments
title_full_unstemmed Bond Durability of a Repaired Resin Composite Using a Universal Adhesive and Different Surface Treatments
title_sort bond durability of a repaired resin composite using a universal adhesive and different surface treatments
publishDate 2023
url https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/84480
_version_ 1781416406837886976