Cost-Utility Analysis of Community Case Management for Malaria Control in Burundi

Background: The community case management (CCM) program for malaria control is a community-based strategy implemented to regulate malaria in children in Burundi. This study compared the cost and utility of implementing the CCM program combined with health facility management (HFM) versus HFM alone f...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Hezagira N.
Other Authors: Mahidol University
Format: Article
Published: 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/84651
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Mahidol University
id th-mahidol.84651
record_format dspace
spelling th-mahidol.846512023-06-19T00:14:22Z Cost-Utility Analysis of Community Case Management for Malaria Control in Burundi Hezagira N. Mahidol University Environmental Science Background: The community case management (CCM) program for malaria control is a community-based strategy implemented to regulate malaria in children in Burundi. This study compared the cost and utility of implementing the CCM program combined with health facility management (HFM) versus HFM alone for malaria control in children under five in Burundi. Methods: This study constructed a five-year Markov model with one-week cycles to estimate cost-utility and budget impact analysis (BIA). The model defined 10 health states, simulating the progression of the disease and the risk of recurrent malaria in children under five years of age. Cost data were empirically collected and presented for 2019. Incremental cost per disability-adjusted life year (DALY) averted, and a five-year budget was estimated. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSAs) were then performed. Results: From provider and societal perspectives, combining the CCM program with HFM for malaria control in Burundi was more cost-effective than implementing HFM alone. The addition of CCM, using artesunate amodiaquine (ASAQ) as the first-line treatment, increased by US$1.70, and US$ 1.67 per DALY averted from the provider and societal perspectives, respectively. Using Artemether Lumefantrine (AL) as the first-line treatment, adding the CCM program to HFM increased by US$ 1.92, and US$ 1.87 per DALY averted from the provider and societal perspectives. At a willingness-to-pay of one GDP/capita, the CCM program remained a 100% chance of being cost-effective. In addition, implementing the program for five years requires a budget of US$ 15 800 486–19 765 117. Conclusion: Implementing the CCM program and HFM is value for money for malaria control in Burundi. The findings can support decision-makers in Burundi in deciding on resource allocation, especially during the program’s scale up. 2023-06-18T17:14:22Z 2023-06-18T17:14:22Z 2022-12-01 Article International Journal of Health Policy and Management Vol.11 No.12 (2022) , 2990-2999 10.34172/ijhpm.2022.6290 23225939 2-s2.0-85145069232 https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/84651 SCOPUS
institution Mahidol University
building Mahidol University Library
continent Asia
country Thailand
Thailand
content_provider Mahidol University Library
collection Mahidol University Institutional Repository
topic Environmental Science
spellingShingle Environmental Science
Hezagira N.
Cost-Utility Analysis of Community Case Management for Malaria Control in Burundi
description Background: The community case management (CCM) program for malaria control is a community-based strategy implemented to regulate malaria in children in Burundi. This study compared the cost and utility of implementing the CCM program combined with health facility management (HFM) versus HFM alone for malaria control in children under five in Burundi. Methods: This study constructed a five-year Markov model with one-week cycles to estimate cost-utility and budget impact analysis (BIA). The model defined 10 health states, simulating the progression of the disease and the risk of recurrent malaria in children under five years of age. Cost data were empirically collected and presented for 2019. Incremental cost per disability-adjusted life year (DALY) averted, and a five-year budget was estimated. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSAs) were then performed. Results: From provider and societal perspectives, combining the CCM program with HFM for malaria control in Burundi was more cost-effective than implementing HFM alone. The addition of CCM, using artesunate amodiaquine (ASAQ) as the first-line treatment, increased by US$1.70, and US$ 1.67 per DALY averted from the provider and societal perspectives, respectively. Using Artemether Lumefantrine (AL) as the first-line treatment, adding the CCM program to HFM increased by US$ 1.92, and US$ 1.87 per DALY averted from the provider and societal perspectives. At a willingness-to-pay of one GDP/capita, the CCM program remained a 100% chance of being cost-effective. In addition, implementing the program for five years requires a budget of US$ 15 800 486–19 765 117. Conclusion: Implementing the CCM program and HFM is value for money for malaria control in Burundi. The findings can support decision-makers in Burundi in deciding on resource allocation, especially during the program’s scale up.
author2 Mahidol University
author_facet Mahidol University
Hezagira N.
format Article
author Hezagira N.
author_sort Hezagira N.
title Cost-Utility Analysis of Community Case Management for Malaria Control in Burundi
title_short Cost-Utility Analysis of Community Case Management for Malaria Control in Burundi
title_full Cost-Utility Analysis of Community Case Management for Malaria Control in Burundi
title_fullStr Cost-Utility Analysis of Community Case Management for Malaria Control in Burundi
title_full_unstemmed Cost-Utility Analysis of Community Case Management for Malaria Control in Burundi
title_sort cost-utility analysis of community case management for malaria control in burundi
publishDate 2023
url https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/84651
_version_ 1781415973722521600