Cognitive Deficit in Alzheimer’s Patients with Normal Scores on the Mini-Mental State Examination

Objective: To study the sensitivity and specificity of the Abbreviated MMSE in Alzheimer patients with normal MMSE scores. Materials and Methods: A retrospective analytic study of 89 normal subjects and Alzheimer’s patients with normal MMSE scores, aged 60 years or older, between 2015 and 2020, from...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Jitrathorn J.
Other Authors: Mahidol University
Format: Article
Published: 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/85194
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Mahidol University
id th-mahidol.85194
record_format dspace
spelling th-mahidol.851942023-06-19T00:37:08Z Cognitive Deficit in Alzheimer’s Patients with Normal Scores on the Mini-Mental State Examination Jitrathorn J. Mahidol University Medicine Objective: To study the sensitivity and specificity of the Abbreviated MMSE in Alzheimer patients with normal MMSE scores. Materials and Methods: A retrospective analytic study of 89 normal subjects and Alzheimer’s patients with normal MMSE scores, aged 60 years or older, between 2015 and 2020, from the Memory Clinic, Ramathobodi Hospital. Pearson chi-square, Fisher’s exact test, and Mann-Whitney U test were used to compare demographic data and MMSE score of each item between the normal subjects and the Alzheimer Disease (AD) subjects. The ROC curve was analyzed to find the proper cut-off points in the three models of the Abbreviated form (p<0.05). Results: AD subjects showed different scores from the normal subjects with statistical significance in four subtests of full MMSE-Thai-2002, namely, date, attention/calculation, recall, and repetition (p<0.001, 0.001, 0.018, and 0.023, respectively). The Model 2 of the Abbreviated MMSE consisting of recall, date, and attention/calculation, was the most proper test to be used in the clinical setting. [AUC (95% CI): 0.905 (0.831 to 0.979)]. The proper cut-off point was seven out of nine with a sensitivity of 89.4%, specificity of 78.3%, of PPV 92.2%, and NPV of 72.2%. Conclusion: The models of short MMSE was an option in case of normal scores in the full version of MMSE with recall impairment. There should be further studies in larger number of Alzheimer’s patients, along with classification of daily life skills and other groups of brain diseases’ patients. 2023-06-18T17:37:08Z 2023-06-18T17:37:08Z 2022-12-01 Article Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand Vol.105 No.12 (2022) , 1183-1190 10.35755/jmedassocthai.2022.12.13701 01252208 2-s2.0-85144372592 https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/85194 SCOPUS
institution Mahidol University
building Mahidol University Library
continent Asia
country Thailand
Thailand
content_provider Mahidol University Library
collection Mahidol University Institutional Repository
topic Medicine
spellingShingle Medicine
Jitrathorn J.
Cognitive Deficit in Alzheimer’s Patients with Normal Scores on the Mini-Mental State Examination
description Objective: To study the sensitivity and specificity of the Abbreviated MMSE in Alzheimer patients with normal MMSE scores. Materials and Methods: A retrospective analytic study of 89 normal subjects and Alzheimer’s patients with normal MMSE scores, aged 60 years or older, between 2015 and 2020, from the Memory Clinic, Ramathobodi Hospital. Pearson chi-square, Fisher’s exact test, and Mann-Whitney U test were used to compare demographic data and MMSE score of each item between the normal subjects and the Alzheimer Disease (AD) subjects. The ROC curve was analyzed to find the proper cut-off points in the three models of the Abbreviated form (p<0.05). Results: AD subjects showed different scores from the normal subjects with statistical significance in four subtests of full MMSE-Thai-2002, namely, date, attention/calculation, recall, and repetition (p<0.001, 0.001, 0.018, and 0.023, respectively). The Model 2 of the Abbreviated MMSE consisting of recall, date, and attention/calculation, was the most proper test to be used in the clinical setting. [AUC (95% CI): 0.905 (0.831 to 0.979)]. The proper cut-off point was seven out of nine with a sensitivity of 89.4%, specificity of 78.3%, of PPV 92.2%, and NPV of 72.2%. Conclusion: The models of short MMSE was an option in case of normal scores in the full version of MMSE with recall impairment. There should be further studies in larger number of Alzheimer’s patients, along with classification of daily life skills and other groups of brain diseases’ patients.
author2 Mahidol University
author_facet Mahidol University
Jitrathorn J.
format Article
author Jitrathorn J.
author_sort Jitrathorn J.
title Cognitive Deficit in Alzheimer’s Patients with Normal Scores on the Mini-Mental State Examination
title_short Cognitive Deficit in Alzheimer’s Patients with Normal Scores on the Mini-Mental State Examination
title_full Cognitive Deficit in Alzheimer’s Patients with Normal Scores on the Mini-Mental State Examination
title_fullStr Cognitive Deficit in Alzheimer’s Patients with Normal Scores on the Mini-Mental State Examination
title_full_unstemmed Cognitive Deficit in Alzheimer’s Patients with Normal Scores on the Mini-Mental State Examination
title_sort cognitive deficit in alzheimer’s patients with normal scores on the mini-mental state examination
publishDate 2023
url https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/85194
_version_ 1781416094363287552