Platelet-rich plasma in alopecia areata and primary cicatricial alopecias: A systematic review

Background: Immune-mediated alopecias (IMAs), a group of hair disorders associated with immunological reactions, remain a therapeutic challenge since available treatments are generally unfavorable with potential side effects. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has been recently proposed as a treatment optio...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Tejapira K.
Other Authors: Mahidol University
Format: Review
Published: 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/85369
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Mahidol University
id th-mahidol.85369
record_format dspace
spelling th-mahidol.853692023-06-19T00:40:32Z Platelet-rich plasma in alopecia areata and primary cicatricial alopecias: A systematic review Tejapira K. Mahidol University Medicine Background: Immune-mediated alopecias (IMAs), a group of hair disorders associated with immunological reactions, remain a therapeutic challenge since available treatments are generally unfavorable with potential side effects. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has been recently proposed as a treatment option based on several limited-quality studies; however, there is no systematic evaluation of PRP efficacy on IMAs in the literature. Objective: To assess PRP’s effects in treating IMAs using a systematic review. Methods: Electronic searches were conducted using PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases. A search strategy was designed to retrieve all studies exploring PRP in treating IMAs, including alopecia areata (AA) and primary cicatricial alopecias (PCAs). In addition, all randomized and non-randomized studies reporting subjective and/or objective outcomes of alopecia treatment with PRP were included. Results: Thirty-two studies were included, comprising 621 patients with AA and 19 patients with PCAs. PRP had superior efficacy as monotherapy in five studies, comparable to intralesional corticosteroids in six studies in AA treatment. In addition, in the analysis of PCAs, including lymphocytic and neutrophilic subtypes, PRP was efficacious in alleviating disease progression in nine studies. Conclusion: PRP is considered a promising treatment for AA and PCAs in patients who experienced unfavorable outcomes from conventional treatment. However, its clinical application remains to be standardized, and its recommendation as a treatment for IMAs could not be ascertained due to a lack of high-quality evidence. Systematic review registration: [https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=353859], identifier [CRD42022353859]. 2023-06-18T17:40:32Z 2023-06-18T17:40:32Z 2022-11-24 Review Frontiers in Medicine Vol.9 (2022) 10.3389/fmed.2022.1058431 2296858X 2-s2.0-85143401467 https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/85369 SCOPUS
institution Mahidol University
building Mahidol University Library
continent Asia
country Thailand
Thailand
content_provider Mahidol University Library
collection Mahidol University Institutional Repository
topic Medicine
spellingShingle Medicine
Tejapira K.
Platelet-rich plasma in alopecia areata and primary cicatricial alopecias: A systematic review
description Background: Immune-mediated alopecias (IMAs), a group of hair disorders associated with immunological reactions, remain a therapeutic challenge since available treatments are generally unfavorable with potential side effects. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has been recently proposed as a treatment option based on several limited-quality studies; however, there is no systematic evaluation of PRP efficacy on IMAs in the literature. Objective: To assess PRP’s effects in treating IMAs using a systematic review. Methods: Electronic searches were conducted using PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases. A search strategy was designed to retrieve all studies exploring PRP in treating IMAs, including alopecia areata (AA) and primary cicatricial alopecias (PCAs). In addition, all randomized and non-randomized studies reporting subjective and/or objective outcomes of alopecia treatment with PRP were included. Results: Thirty-two studies were included, comprising 621 patients with AA and 19 patients with PCAs. PRP had superior efficacy as monotherapy in five studies, comparable to intralesional corticosteroids in six studies in AA treatment. In addition, in the analysis of PCAs, including lymphocytic and neutrophilic subtypes, PRP was efficacious in alleviating disease progression in nine studies. Conclusion: PRP is considered a promising treatment for AA and PCAs in patients who experienced unfavorable outcomes from conventional treatment. However, its clinical application remains to be standardized, and its recommendation as a treatment for IMAs could not be ascertained due to a lack of high-quality evidence. Systematic review registration: [https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=353859], identifier [CRD42022353859].
author2 Mahidol University
author_facet Mahidol University
Tejapira K.
format Review
author Tejapira K.
author_sort Tejapira K.
title Platelet-rich plasma in alopecia areata and primary cicatricial alopecias: A systematic review
title_short Platelet-rich plasma in alopecia areata and primary cicatricial alopecias: A systematic review
title_full Platelet-rich plasma in alopecia areata and primary cicatricial alopecias: A systematic review
title_fullStr Platelet-rich plasma in alopecia areata and primary cicatricial alopecias: A systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Platelet-rich plasma in alopecia areata and primary cicatricial alopecias: A systematic review
title_sort platelet-rich plasma in alopecia areata and primary cicatricial alopecias: a systematic review
publishDate 2023
url https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/85369
_version_ 1781415567113060352