Three-year Efficacy and Safety of Takeda's Dengue Vaccine Candidate (TAK-003)

Background: Takeda's live attenuated tetravalent dengue vaccine candidate (TAK-003) is under evaluation in a long-Term clinical trial across 8 dengue-endemic countries. Previously, we have reported its efficacy and safety in both seronegative and seropositive participants and that its performan...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Rivera L.
Other Authors: Mahidol University
Format: Article
Published: 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/85732
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Mahidol University
id th-mahidol.85732
record_format dspace
spelling th-mahidol.857322023-06-19T00:47:38Z Three-year Efficacy and Safety of Takeda's Dengue Vaccine Candidate (TAK-003) Rivera L. Mahidol University Medicine Background: Takeda's live attenuated tetravalent dengue vaccine candidate (TAK-003) is under evaluation in a long-Term clinical trial across 8 dengue-endemic countries. Previously, we have reported its efficacy and safety in both seronegative and seropositive participants and that its performance varies by serotype, with some decline in efficacy from first to second year postvaccination. This exploratory analysis provides an update with cumulative and third-year data. Methods: Healthy 4-16 year olds (n=20099) were randomized 2:1 to receive TAK-003 or placebo (0, 3 month schedule). The protocol included baseline serostatus testing of all participants and detection of all symptomatic dengue throughout the trial with a serotype specific reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction. Results: Cumulative efficacy after 3 years was 62.0% (95% confidence interval, 56.6-66.7) against virologically confirmed dengue (VCD) and 83.6% (76.8-88.4) against hospitalized VCD. Efficacy was 54.3% (41.9-64.1) against VCD and 77.1% (58.6-87.3) against hospitalized VCD in baseline seronegatives, and 65.0% (58.9-70.1) against VCD and 86.0% (78.4-91.0) against hospitalized VCD in baseline seropositives. Efficacy against VCD during the third year declined to 44.7% (32.5-54.7), whereas efficacy against hospitalized VCD was sustained at 70.8% (49.6-83.0). Rates of serious adverse events were 2.9% in TAK-003 group and 3.5% in placebo group during the ongoing long-Term follow-up (ie, second half of the 3 years following vaccination), but none were related. No important safety risks were identified. Conclusions: TAK-003 was efficacious against symptomatic dengue over 3 years. Efficacy declined over time but remained robust against hospitalized dengue. A booster dose evaluation is planned. 2023-06-18T17:47:38Z 2023-06-18T17:47:38Z 2022-07-01 Article Clinical Infectious Diseases Vol.75 No.1 (2022) , 107-117 10.1093/cid/ciab864 15376591 10584838 34606595 2-s2.0-85137134527 https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/85732 SCOPUS
institution Mahidol University
building Mahidol University Library
continent Asia
country Thailand
Thailand
content_provider Mahidol University Library
collection Mahidol University Institutional Repository
topic Medicine
spellingShingle Medicine
Rivera L.
Three-year Efficacy and Safety of Takeda's Dengue Vaccine Candidate (TAK-003)
description Background: Takeda's live attenuated tetravalent dengue vaccine candidate (TAK-003) is under evaluation in a long-Term clinical trial across 8 dengue-endemic countries. Previously, we have reported its efficacy and safety in both seronegative and seropositive participants and that its performance varies by serotype, with some decline in efficacy from first to second year postvaccination. This exploratory analysis provides an update with cumulative and third-year data. Methods: Healthy 4-16 year olds (n=20099) were randomized 2:1 to receive TAK-003 or placebo (0, 3 month schedule). The protocol included baseline serostatus testing of all participants and detection of all symptomatic dengue throughout the trial with a serotype specific reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction. Results: Cumulative efficacy after 3 years was 62.0% (95% confidence interval, 56.6-66.7) against virologically confirmed dengue (VCD) and 83.6% (76.8-88.4) against hospitalized VCD. Efficacy was 54.3% (41.9-64.1) against VCD and 77.1% (58.6-87.3) against hospitalized VCD in baseline seronegatives, and 65.0% (58.9-70.1) against VCD and 86.0% (78.4-91.0) against hospitalized VCD in baseline seropositives. Efficacy against VCD during the third year declined to 44.7% (32.5-54.7), whereas efficacy against hospitalized VCD was sustained at 70.8% (49.6-83.0). Rates of serious adverse events were 2.9% in TAK-003 group and 3.5% in placebo group during the ongoing long-Term follow-up (ie, second half of the 3 years following vaccination), but none were related. No important safety risks were identified. Conclusions: TAK-003 was efficacious against symptomatic dengue over 3 years. Efficacy declined over time but remained robust against hospitalized dengue. A booster dose evaluation is planned.
author2 Mahidol University
author_facet Mahidol University
Rivera L.
format Article
author Rivera L.
author_sort Rivera L.
title Three-year Efficacy and Safety of Takeda's Dengue Vaccine Candidate (TAK-003)
title_short Three-year Efficacy and Safety of Takeda's Dengue Vaccine Candidate (TAK-003)
title_full Three-year Efficacy and Safety of Takeda's Dengue Vaccine Candidate (TAK-003)
title_fullStr Three-year Efficacy and Safety of Takeda's Dengue Vaccine Candidate (TAK-003)
title_full_unstemmed Three-year Efficacy and Safety of Takeda's Dengue Vaccine Candidate (TAK-003)
title_sort three-year efficacy and safety of takeda's dengue vaccine candidate (tak-003)
publishDate 2023
url https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/85732
_version_ 1781414676265959424