Comparison of Molecular International Prognostic Scoring System (M-IPSS) and Revised International Prognostic Scoring System (R-IPSS) in Thai patients with myelodysplastic neoplasms
Introduction: Risk stratification is essential for treatment decision in myelodysplastic neoplasms (MDS). Molecular international prognostic scoring system (M-IPSS) has been recently developed combining somatic mutations and clinical information being used in the revised international prognostic sco...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Letter |
Published: |
2023
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/86226 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Mahidol University |
id |
th-mahidol.86226 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
th-mahidol.862262023-06-19T00:57:18Z Comparison of Molecular International Prognostic Scoring System (M-IPSS) and Revised International Prognostic Scoring System (R-IPSS) in Thai patients with myelodysplastic neoplasms Polprasert C. Mahidol University Medicine Introduction: Risk stratification is essential for treatment decision in myelodysplastic neoplasms (MDS). Molecular international prognostic scoring system (M-IPSS) has been recently developed combining somatic mutations and clinical information being used in the revised international prognostic scoring system (R-IPSS). Objective: We aimed to explore the performances of M-IPSS and R-IPSS in Thai patients with MDS. Method: MDS patients were stratified into risk categories using R-IPSS and M-IPSS scores. The performance of both models were evaluated for prognostic prediction. Results: One hundred and sixty-two MDS patients were recruited from the multicenter study. Survival analysis revealed that both R-IPSS and M-IPSS were good prediction models with the Concordance Index (C-index) of 0.71 (95% Confidence interval [CI] 0.64–0.78) and 0.75 (95% CI 0.69–0.80), respectively (p = 0.22). Comparing the two, 13 of 162 (8%) cases were re-staged between lower and higher risks which would have affected treatment decisions. Conclusion: Our study showed that R-IPSS score can be used for risk stratification in most Thai patients. A prediction model using somatic mutations specifically in Asian patients should be formulated in the future. 2023-06-18T17:57:18Z 2023-06-18T17:57:18Z 2022-01-01 Letter Hematology (United Kingdom) Vol.27 No.1 (2022) , 1294-1297 10.1080/16078454.2022.2156682 16078454 10245332 36519260 2-s2.0-85144587452 https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/86226 SCOPUS |
institution |
Mahidol University |
building |
Mahidol University Library |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Thailand Thailand |
content_provider |
Mahidol University Library |
collection |
Mahidol University Institutional Repository |
topic |
Medicine |
spellingShingle |
Medicine Polprasert C. Comparison of Molecular International Prognostic Scoring System (M-IPSS) and Revised International Prognostic Scoring System (R-IPSS) in Thai patients with myelodysplastic neoplasms |
description |
Introduction: Risk stratification is essential for treatment decision in myelodysplastic neoplasms (MDS). Molecular international prognostic scoring system (M-IPSS) has been recently developed combining somatic mutations and clinical information being used in the revised international prognostic scoring system (R-IPSS). Objective: We aimed to explore the performances of M-IPSS and R-IPSS in Thai patients with MDS. Method: MDS patients were stratified into risk categories using R-IPSS and M-IPSS scores. The performance of both models were evaluated for prognostic prediction. Results: One hundred and sixty-two MDS patients were recruited from the multicenter study. Survival analysis revealed that both R-IPSS and M-IPSS were good prediction models with the Concordance Index (C-index) of 0.71 (95% Confidence interval [CI] 0.64–0.78) and 0.75 (95% CI 0.69–0.80), respectively (p = 0.22). Comparing the two, 13 of 162 (8%) cases were re-staged between lower and higher risks which would have affected treatment decisions. Conclusion: Our study showed that R-IPSS score can be used for risk stratification in most Thai patients. A prediction model using somatic mutations specifically in Asian patients should be formulated in the future. |
author2 |
Mahidol University |
author_facet |
Mahidol University Polprasert C. |
format |
Letter |
author |
Polprasert C. |
author_sort |
Polprasert C. |
title |
Comparison of Molecular International Prognostic Scoring System (M-IPSS) and Revised International Prognostic Scoring System (R-IPSS) in Thai patients with myelodysplastic neoplasms |
title_short |
Comparison of Molecular International Prognostic Scoring System (M-IPSS) and Revised International Prognostic Scoring System (R-IPSS) in Thai patients with myelodysplastic neoplasms |
title_full |
Comparison of Molecular International Prognostic Scoring System (M-IPSS) and Revised International Prognostic Scoring System (R-IPSS) in Thai patients with myelodysplastic neoplasms |
title_fullStr |
Comparison of Molecular International Prognostic Scoring System (M-IPSS) and Revised International Prognostic Scoring System (R-IPSS) in Thai patients with myelodysplastic neoplasms |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparison of Molecular International Prognostic Scoring System (M-IPSS) and Revised International Prognostic Scoring System (R-IPSS) in Thai patients with myelodysplastic neoplasms |
title_sort |
comparison of molecular international prognostic scoring system (m-ipss) and revised international prognostic scoring system (r-ipss) in thai patients with myelodysplastic neoplasms |
publishDate |
2023 |
url |
https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/86226 |
_version_ |
1781415060954939392 |