Comparison of Molecular International Prognostic Scoring System (M-IPSS) and Revised International Prognostic Scoring System (R-IPSS) in Thai patients with myelodysplastic neoplasms

Introduction: Risk stratification is essential for treatment decision in myelodysplastic neoplasms (MDS). Molecular international prognostic scoring system (M-IPSS) has been recently developed combining somatic mutations and clinical information being used in the revised international prognostic sco...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Polprasert C.
Other Authors: Mahidol University
Format: Letter
Published: 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/86226
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Mahidol University
id th-mahidol.86226
record_format dspace
spelling th-mahidol.862262023-06-19T00:57:18Z Comparison of Molecular International Prognostic Scoring System (M-IPSS) and Revised International Prognostic Scoring System (R-IPSS) in Thai patients with myelodysplastic neoplasms Polprasert C. Mahidol University Medicine Introduction: Risk stratification is essential for treatment decision in myelodysplastic neoplasms (MDS). Molecular international prognostic scoring system (M-IPSS) has been recently developed combining somatic mutations and clinical information being used in the revised international prognostic scoring system (R-IPSS). Objective: We aimed to explore the performances of M-IPSS and R-IPSS in Thai patients with MDS. Method: MDS patients were stratified into risk categories using R-IPSS and M-IPSS scores. The performance of both models were evaluated for prognostic prediction. Results: One hundred and sixty-two MDS patients were recruited from the multicenter study. Survival analysis revealed that both R-IPSS and M-IPSS were good prediction models with the Concordance Index (C-index) of 0.71 (95% Confidence interval [CI] 0.64–0.78) and 0.75 (95% CI 0.69–0.80), respectively (p = 0.22). Comparing the two, 13 of 162 (8%) cases were re-staged between lower and higher risks which would have affected treatment decisions. Conclusion: Our study showed that R-IPSS score can be used for risk stratification in most Thai patients. A prediction model using somatic mutations specifically in Asian patients should be formulated in the future. 2023-06-18T17:57:18Z 2023-06-18T17:57:18Z 2022-01-01 Letter Hematology (United Kingdom) Vol.27 No.1 (2022) , 1294-1297 10.1080/16078454.2022.2156682 16078454 10245332 36519260 2-s2.0-85144587452 https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/86226 SCOPUS
institution Mahidol University
building Mahidol University Library
continent Asia
country Thailand
Thailand
content_provider Mahidol University Library
collection Mahidol University Institutional Repository
topic Medicine
spellingShingle Medicine
Polprasert C.
Comparison of Molecular International Prognostic Scoring System (M-IPSS) and Revised International Prognostic Scoring System (R-IPSS) in Thai patients with myelodysplastic neoplasms
description Introduction: Risk stratification is essential for treatment decision in myelodysplastic neoplasms (MDS). Molecular international prognostic scoring system (M-IPSS) has been recently developed combining somatic mutations and clinical information being used in the revised international prognostic scoring system (R-IPSS). Objective: We aimed to explore the performances of M-IPSS and R-IPSS in Thai patients with MDS. Method: MDS patients were stratified into risk categories using R-IPSS and M-IPSS scores. The performance of both models were evaluated for prognostic prediction. Results: One hundred and sixty-two MDS patients were recruited from the multicenter study. Survival analysis revealed that both R-IPSS and M-IPSS were good prediction models with the Concordance Index (C-index) of 0.71 (95% Confidence interval [CI] 0.64–0.78) and 0.75 (95% CI 0.69–0.80), respectively (p = 0.22). Comparing the two, 13 of 162 (8%) cases were re-staged between lower and higher risks which would have affected treatment decisions. Conclusion: Our study showed that R-IPSS score can be used for risk stratification in most Thai patients. A prediction model using somatic mutations specifically in Asian patients should be formulated in the future.
author2 Mahidol University
author_facet Mahidol University
Polprasert C.
format Letter
author Polprasert C.
author_sort Polprasert C.
title Comparison of Molecular International Prognostic Scoring System (M-IPSS) and Revised International Prognostic Scoring System (R-IPSS) in Thai patients with myelodysplastic neoplasms
title_short Comparison of Molecular International Prognostic Scoring System (M-IPSS) and Revised International Prognostic Scoring System (R-IPSS) in Thai patients with myelodysplastic neoplasms
title_full Comparison of Molecular International Prognostic Scoring System (M-IPSS) and Revised International Prognostic Scoring System (R-IPSS) in Thai patients with myelodysplastic neoplasms
title_fullStr Comparison of Molecular International Prognostic Scoring System (M-IPSS) and Revised International Prognostic Scoring System (R-IPSS) in Thai patients with myelodysplastic neoplasms
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Molecular International Prognostic Scoring System (M-IPSS) and Revised International Prognostic Scoring System (R-IPSS) in Thai patients with myelodysplastic neoplasms
title_sort comparison of molecular international prognostic scoring system (m-ipss) and revised international prognostic scoring system (r-ipss) in thai patients with myelodysplastic neoplasms
publishDate 2023
url https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/86226
_version_ 1781415060954939392