Self-reported antibiotic stewardship and infection control measures from 57 intensive care units: An international ID-IRI survey

We explored the self-reported antibiotic stewardship (AS), and infection prevention and control (IPC) activities in intensive care units (ICUs) of different income settings. A cross-sectional study was conducted using an online questionnaire to collect data about IPC and AS measures in participating...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: El-Sokkary R.
Other Authors: Mahidol University
Format: Article
Published: 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/87258
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Mahidol University
id th-mahidol.87258
record_format dspace
spelling th-mahidol.872582023-06-20T12:26:47Z Self-reported antibiotic stewardship and infection control measures from 57 intensive care units: An international ID-IRI survey El-Sokkary R. Mahidol University Medicine We explored the self-reported antibiotic stewardship (AS), and infection prevention and control (IPC) activities in intensive care units (ICUs) of different income settings. A cross-sectional study was conducted using an online questionnaire to collect data about IPC and AS measures in participating ICUs. The study participants were Infectious Diseases–International Research Initiative (IDI-IR) members, committed as per their institutional agreement form. We analyzed responses from 57 ICUs in 24 countries (Lower-middle income (LMI), n = 13; Upper-middle income (UMI), n = 33; High-income (HI), n = 11). This represented (~5%) of centers represented in the ID-IRI. Surveillance programs were implemented in (76.9%−90.9%) of ICUs with fewer contact precaution measures in LMI ones (p = 0.02); (LMI:69.2%, UMI:97%, HI:100%). Participation in regional antimicrobial resistance programs was more significantly applied in HI (p = 0.02) (LMI:38.4%,UMI:81.8%,HI:72.2%). AS programs are implemented in 77.2% of institutions with AS champions in 66.7%. Infectious diseases physicians and microbiologists are members of many AS teams (59%&50%) respectively. Unqualified healthcare professionals(42.1%), and deficient incentives(28.1%) are the main barriers to implementing AS. We underscore the existing differences in IPC and AS programs’ implementation, team composition, and faced barriers. Continuous collaboration and sharing best practices on APM is needed. The role of regional and international organizations should be encouraged. Global support for capacity building of healthcare practitioners is warranted. 2023-06-20T05:26:47Z 2023-06-20T05:26:47Z 2022-09-01 Article Journal of Infection and Public Health Vol.15 No.9 (2022) , 950-954 10.1016/j.jiph.2022.07.009 1876035X 18760341 35917656 2-s2.0-85135500779 https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/87258 SCOPUS
institution Mahidol University
building Mahidol University Library
continent Asia
country Thailand
Thailand
content_provider Mahidol University Library
collection Mahidol University Institutional Repository
topic Medicine
spellingShingle Medicine
El-Sokkary R.
Self-reported antibiotic stewardship and infection control measures from 57 intensive care units: An international ID-IRI survey
description We explored the self-reported antibiotic stewardship (AS), and infection prevention and control (IPC) activities in intensive care units (ICUs) of different income settings. A cross-sectional study was conducted using an online questionnaire to collect data about IPC and AS measures in participating ICUs. The study participants were Infectious Diseases–International Research Initiative (IDI-IR) members, committed as per their institutional agreement form. We analyzed responses from 57 ICUs in 24 countries (Lower-middle income (LMI), n = 13; Upper-middle income (UMI), n = 33; High-income (HI), n = 11). This represented (~5%) of centers represented in the ID-IRI. Surveillance programs were implemented in (76.9%−90.9%) of ICUs with fewer contact precaution measures in LMI ones (p = 0.02); (LMI:69.2%, UMI:97%, HI:100%). Participation in regional antimicrobial resistance programs was more significantly applied in HI (p = 0.02) (LMI:38.4%,UMI:81.8%,HI:72.2%). AS programs are implemented in 77.2% of institutions with AS champions in 66.7%. Infectious diseases physicians and microbiologists are members of many AS teams (59%&50%) respectively. Unqualified healthcare professionals(42.1%), and deficient incentives(28.1%) are the main barriers to implementing AS. We underscore the existing differences in IPC and AS programs’ implementation, team composition, and faced barriers. Continuous collaboration and sharing best practices on APM is needed. The role of regional and international organizations should be encouraged. Global support for capacity building of healthcare practitioners is warranted.
author2 Mahidol University
author_facet Mahidol University
El-Sokkary R.
format Article
author El-Sokkary R.
author_sort El-Sokkary R.
title Self-reported antibiotic stewardship and infection control measures from 57 intensive care units: An international ID-IRI survey
title_short Self-reported antibiotic stewardship and infection control measures from 57 intensive care units: An international ID-IRI survey
title_full Self-reported antibiotic stewardship and infection control measures from 57 intensive care units: An international ID-IRI survey
title_fullStr Self-reported antibiotic stewardship and infection control measures from 57 intensive care units: An international ID-IRI survey
title_full_unstemmed Self-reported antibiotic stewardship and infection control measures from 57 intensive care units: An international ID-IRI survey
title_sort self-reported antibiotic stewardship and infection control measures from 57 intensive care units: an international id-iri survey
publishDate 2023
url https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/87258
_version_ 1781414760331345920