White blood cell differentials performance of a new automated digital cell morphology analyzer: Mindray MC-80

Introduction: The manual differential count has been recognized for its disadvantages, including large interobserver variability and labor intensiveness. In this light, automated digital cell morphology analyzers have been increasingly adopted in hematology laboratories for their robustness and conv...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Khongjaroensakun N.
Other Authors: Mahidol University
Format: Article
Published: 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/87752
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Mahidol University
id th-mahidol.87752
record_format dspace
spelling th-mahidol.877522023-07-08T01:01:08Z White blood cell differentials performance of a new automated digital cell morphology analyzer: Mindray MC-80 Khongjaroensakun N. Mahidol University Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology Introduction: The manual differential count has been recognized for its disadvantages, including large interobserver variability and labor intensiveness. In this light, automated digital cell morphology analyzers have been increasingly adopted in hematology laboratories for their robustness and convenience. This study aims to evaluate the white blood cell differential performance of the Mindray MC-80, the new automated digital cell morphology analyzer. Methods: The cell identification performance of Mindray MC-80 was evaluated for sensitivity and specificity using pre-classification and post-classification of each cell class. The method comparison study used manual differentials as the gold standard for calculating Pearson correlation, Passing-Bablok regression, and Bland–Altman analysis. In addition, the precision study was performed and evaluated. Results: The precision was within the acceptable limit for all cell classes. Overall, the specificity of cell identification was higher than 95% for all cell classes. The sensitivity was greater for 95% for most cell classes, except for myelocytes (94.9%), metamyelocytes (90.9%), reactive lymphocytes (89.7%), and plasma cells (60%). Pre-classification and post-classification results correlated well with the manual differential results for all the cell types investigated. The regression coefficients were greater than 0.9 for most cell classes except for promyelocytes, metamyelocytes, basophils, and reactive lymphocytes. Conclusion: The performance of Mindray MC-80 for white blood cell differentials is reliable and seems to be acceptable even in abnormal samples. However, the sensitivity is less than 95% for certain abnormal cell types, so the user should be aware of this limitation where such cells are suspected. 2023-07-07T18:01:08Z 2023-07-07T18:01:08Z 2023-01-01 Article International Journal of Laboratory Hematology (2023) 10.1111/ijlh.14119 1751553X 17515521 2-s2.0-85163035276 https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/87752 SCOPUS
institution Mahidol University
building Mahidol University Library
continent Asia
country Thailand
Thailand
content_provider Mahidol University Library
collection Mahidol University Institutional Repository
topic Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
spellingShingle Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Khongjaroensakun N.
White blood cell differentials performance of a new automated digital cell morphology analyzer: Mindray MC-80
description Introduction: The manual differential count has been recognized for its disadvantages, including large interobserver variability and labor intensiveness. In this light, automated digital cell morphology analyzers have been increasingly adopted in hematology laboratories for their robustness and convenience. This study aims to evaluate the white blood cell differential performance of the Mindray MC-80, the new automated digital cell morphology analyzer. Methods: The cell identification performance of Mindray MC-80 was evaluated for sensitivity and specificity using pre-classification and post-classification of each cell class. The method comparison study used manual differentials as the gold standard for calculating Pearson correlation, Passing-Bablok regression, and Bland–Altman analysis. In addition, the precision study was performed and evaluated. Results: The precision was within the acceptable limit for all cell classes. Overall, the specificity of cell identification was higher than 95% for all cell classes. The sensitivity was greater for 95% for most cell classes, except for myelocytes (94.9%), metamyelocytes (90.9%), reactive lymphocytes (89.7%), and plasma cells (60%). Pre-classification and post-classification results correlated well with the manual differential results for all the cell types investigated. The regression coefficients were greater than 0.9 for most cell classes except for promyelocytes, metamyelocytes, basophils, and reactive lymphocytes. Conclusion: The performance of Mindray MC-80 for white blood cell differentials is reliable and seems to be acceptable even in abnormal samples. However, the sensitivity is less than 95% for certain abnormal cell types, so the user should be aware of this limitation where such cells are suspected.
author2 Mahidol University
author_facet Mahidol University
Khongjaroensakun N.
format Article
author Khongjaroensakun N.
author_sort Khongjaroensakun N.
title White blood cell differentials performance of a new automated digital cell morphology analyzer: Mindray MC-80
title_short White blood cell differentials performance of a new automated digital cell morphology analyzer: Mindray MC-80
title_full White blood cell differentials performance of a new automated digital cell morphology analyzer: Mindray MC-80
title_fullStr White blood cell differentials performance of a new automated digital cell morphology analyzer: Mindray MC-80
title_full_unstemmed White blood cell differentials performance of a new automated digital cell morphology analyzer: Mindray MC-80
title_sort white blood cell differentials performance of a new automated digital cell morphology analyzer: mindray mc-80
publishDate 2023
url https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/87752
_version_ 1781416817122607104