White blood cell differentials performance of a new automated digital cell morphology analyzer: Mindray MC-80
Introduction: The manual differential count has been recognized for its disadvantages, including large interobserver variability and labor intensiveness. In this light, automated digital cell morphology analyzers have been increasingly adopted in hematology laboratories for their robustness and conv...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Article |
Published: |
2023
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/87752 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Mahidol University |
id |
th-mahidol.87752 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
th-mahidol.877522023-07-08T01:01:08Z White blood cell differentials performance of a new automated digital cell morphology analyzer: Mindray MC-80 Khongjaroensakun N. Mahidol University Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology Introduction: The manual differential count has been recognized for its disadvantages, including large interobserver variability and labor intensiveness. In this light, automated digital cell morphology analyzers have been increasingly adopted in hematology laboratories for their robustness and convenience. This study aims to evaluate the white blood cell differential performance of the Mindray MC-80, the new automated digital cell morphology analyzer. Methods: The cell identification performance of Mindray MC-80 was evaluated for sensitivity and specificity using pre-classification and post-classification of each cell class. The method comparison study used manual differentials as the gold standard for calculating Pearson correlation, Passing-Bablok regression, and Bland–Altman analysis. In addition, the precision study was performed and evaluated. Results: The precision was within the acceptable limit for all cell classes. Overall, the specificity of cell identification was higher than 95% for all cell classes. The sensitivity was greater for 95% for most cell classes, except for myelocytes (94.9%), metamyelocytes (90.9%), reactive lymphocytes (89.7%), and plasma cells (60%). Pre-classification and post-classification results correlated well with the manual differential results for all the cell types investigated. The regression coefficients were greater than 0.9 for most cell classes except for promyelocytes, metamyelocytes, basophils, and reactive lymphocytes. Conclusion: The performance of Mindray MC-80 for white blood cell differentials is reliable and seems to be acceptable even in abnormal samples. However, the sensitivity is less than 95% for certain abnormal cell types, so the user should be aware of this limitation where such cells are suspected. 2023-07-07T18:01:08Z 2023-07-07T18:01:08Z 2023-01-01 Article International Journal of Laboratory Hematology (2023) 10.1111/ijlh.14119 1751553X 17515521 2-s2.0-85163035276 https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/87752 SCOPUS |
institution |
Mahidol University |
building |
Mahidol University Library |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Thailand Thailand |
content_provider |
Mahidol University Library |
collection |
Mahidol University Institutional Repository |
topic |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology |
spellingShingle |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology Khongjaroensakun N. White blood cell differentials performance of a new automated digital cell morphology analyzer: Mindray MC-80 |
description |
Introduction: The manual differential count has been recognized for its disadvantages, including large interobserver variability and labor intensiveness. In this light, automated digital cell morphology analyzers have been increasingly adopted in hematology laboratories for their robustness and convenience. This study aims to evaluate the white blood cell differential performance of the Mindray MC-80, the new automated digital cell morphology analyzer. Methods: The cell identification performance of Mindray MC-80 was evaluated for sensitivity and specificity using pre-classification and post-classification of each cell class. The method comparison study used manual differentials as the gold standard for calculating Pearson correlation, Passing-Bablok regression, and Bland–Altman analysis. In addition, the precision study was performed and evaluated. Results: The precision was within the acceptable limit for all cell classes. Overall, the specificity of cell identification was higher than 95% for all cell classes. The sensitivity was greater for 95% for most cell classes, except for myelocytes (94.9%), metamyelocytes (90.9%), reactive lymphocytes (89.7%), and plasma cells (60%). Pre-classification and post-classification results correlated well with the manual differential results for all the cell types investigated. The regression coefficients were greater than 0.9 for most cell classes except for promyelocytes, metamyelocytes, basophils, and reactive lymphocytes. Conclusion: The performance of Mindray MC-80 for white blood cell differentials is reliable and seems to be acceptable even in abnormal samples. However, the sensitivity is less than 95% for certain abnormal cell types, so the user should be aware of this limitation where such cells are suspected. |
author2 |
Mahidol University |
author_facet |
Mahidol University Khongjaroensakun N. |
format |
Article |
author |
Khongjaroensakun N. |
author_sort |
Khongjaroensakun N. |
title |
White blood cell differentials performance of a new automated digital cell morphology analyzer: Mindray MC-80 |
title_short |
White blood cell differentials performance of a new automated digital cell morphology analyzer: Mindray MC-80 |
title_full |
White blood cell differentials performance of a new automated digital cell morphology analyzer: Mindray MC-80 |
title_fullStr |
White blood cell differentials performance of a new automated digital cell morphology analyzer: Mindray MC-80 |
title_full_unstemmed |
White blood cell differentials performance of a new automated digital cell morphology analyzer: Mindray MC-80 |
title_sort |
white blood cell differentials performance of a new automated digital cell morphology analyzer: mindray mc-80 |
publishDate |
2023 |
url |
https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/87752 |
_version_ |
1781416817122607104 |