Optimising blood glucose control with portioned meal box in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients: a randomised control trial

Background: The impact of dietary factors on glycaemic control in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is well established. However, the effectiveness of transforming portion control into a practical innovation for glycaemic control in T2DM has not yet been established for counselling in nutrition. The a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Maneesing T.U.
Other Authors: Mahidol University
Format: Article
Published: 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/88294
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Mahidol University
id th-mahidol.88294
record_format dspace
spelling th-mahidol.882942023-08-12T01:01:50Z Optimising blood glucose control with portioned meal box in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients: a randomised control trial Maneesing T.U. Mahidol University Medicine Background: The impact of dietary factors on glycaemic control in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is well established. However, the effectiveness of transforming portion control into a practical innovation for glycaemic control in T2DM has not yet been established for counselling in nutrition. The aim of this study was to compare the effect of general counselling in nutrition (GCN) and a portioned meal box (PMB) on fasting blood glucose, glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) and body composition. Methods: A randomised, parallel intervention trial was conducted over 12 weeks, with GCN: carbohydrate portion control concept by using food exchange lists (n = 25) and PMB: portioned meal box was set by energy requirements (n = 25). Results: Both GCN and PMB demonstrated reductions in HbA1c levels at the 6th and 12th weeks compared to baseline. However, no significant difference in HbA1c was observed between GCN and PMB at either the 6th or 12th week. Using PMB at least four times a week significantly decreased HbA1c during the intervention period (p = 0.021 and p < 0.001 for weeks 6 and 12 when compared with baseline, respectively). Changes in body composition were observed: body weight decrease in PMB only, body fat decrease and constant muscle mass in both groups. Both methods tended to relieve hunger and increased satiety in both groups. The satisfaction evaluation showed that participants preferred to use PMB over GCN (p = 0.001). Additionally, participants consumed less energy, carbohydrate and fat in PMB (p = 0.001, p = 0.019, and p = 0.001, respectively) and less energy and fat in GCN (p = 0.006 and p = 0.001, respectively). Conclusion: A better diet, either through GCN or PMB, can play an important role in improving dietary intake compliance and controlling blood glucose. 2023-08-11T18:01:49Z 2023-08-11T18:01:49Z 2023-01-01 Article Frontiers in Nutrition Vol.10 (2023) 10.3389/fnut.2023.1216753 2296861X 2-s2.0-85166428606 https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/88294 SCOPUS
institution Mahidol University
building Mahidol University Library
continent Asia
country Thailand
Thailand
content_provider Mahidol University Library
collection Mahidol University Institutional Repository
topic Medicine
spellingShingle Medicine
Maneesing T.U.
Optimising blood glucose control with portioned meal box in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients: a randomised control trial
description Background: The impact of dietary factors on glycaemic control in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is well established. However, the effectiveness of transforming portion control into a practical innovation for glycaemic control in T2DM has not yet been established for counselling in nutrition. The aim of this study was to compare the effect of general counselling in nutrition (GCN) and a portioned meal box (PMB) on fasting blood glucose, glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) and body composition. Methods: A randomised, parallel intervention trial was conducted over 12 weeks, with GCN: carbohydrate portion control concept by using food exchange lists (n = 25) and PMB: portioned meal box was set by energy requirements (n = 25). Results: Both GCN and PMB demonstrated reductions in HbA1c levels at the 6th and 12th weeks compared to baseline. However, no significant difference in HbA1c was observed between GCN and PMB at either the 6th or 12th week. Using PMB at least four times a week significantly decreased HbA1c during the intervention period (p = 0.021 and p < 0.001 for weeks 6 and 12 when compared with baseline, respectively). Changes in body composition were observed: body weight decrease in PMB only, body fat decrease and constant muscle mass in both groups. Both methods tended to relieve hunger and increased satiety in both groups. The satisfaction evaluation showed that participants preferred to use PMB over GCN (p = 0.001). Additionally, participants consumed less energy, carbohydrate and fat in PMB (p = 0.001, p = 0.019, and p = 0.001, respectively) and less energy and fat in GCN (p = 0.006 and p = 0.001, respectively). Conclusion: A better diet, either through GCN or PMB, can play an important role in improving dietary intake compliance and controlling blood glucose.
author2 Mahidol University
author_facet Mahidol University
Maneesing T.U.
format Article
author Maneesing T.U.
author_sort Maneesing T.U.
title Optimising blood glucose control with portioned meal box in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients: a randomised control trial
title_short Optimising blood glucose control with portioned meal box in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients: a randomised control trial
title_full Optimising blood glucose control with portioned meal box in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients: a randomised control trial
title_fullStr Optimising blood glucose control with portioned meal box in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients: a randomised control trial
title_full_unstemmed Optimising blood glucose control with portioned meal box in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients: a randomised control trial
title_sort optimising blood glucose control with portioned meal box in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients: a randomised control trial
publishDate 2023
url https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/88294
_version_ 1781415520893927424