Comparing Explainable Machine Learning Approaches With Traditional Statistical Methods for Evaluating Stroke Risk Models: Retrospective Cohort Study

Background: Stroke has multiple modifiable and nonmodifiable risk factors and represents a leading cause of death globally. Understanding the complex interplay of stroke risk factors is thus not only a scientific necessity but a critical step toward improving global health outcomes. Objective: We ai...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Lolak S.
Other Authors: Mahidol University
Format: Article
Published: 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/88951
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Mahidol University
id th-mahidol.88951
record_format dspace
spelling th-mahidol.889512023-08-30T01:01:46Z Comparing Explainable Machine Learning Approaches With Traditional Statistical Methods for Evaluating Stroke Risk Models: Retrospective Cohort Study Lolak S. Mahidol University Medicine Background: Stroke has multiple modifiable and nonmodifiable risk factors and represents a leading cause of death globally. Understanding the complex interplay of stroke risk factors is thus not only a scientific necessity but a critical step toward improving global health outcomes. Objective: We aim to assess the performance of explainable machine learning models in predicting stroke risk factors using real-world cohort data by comparing explainable machine learning models with conventional statistical methods. Methods: This retrospective cohort included high-risk patients from Ramathibodi Hospital in Thailand between January 2010 and December 2020. We compared the performance and explainability of logistic regression (LR), Cox proportional hazard, Bayesian network (BN), tree-augmented Naïve Bayes (TAN), extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), and explainable boosting machine (EBM) models. We used multiple imputation by chained equations for missing data and discretized continuous variables as needed. Models were evaluated using C-statistics and F1-scores. Results: Out of 275,247 high-risk patients, 9659 (3.5%) experienced a stroke. XGBoost demonstrated the highest performance with a C-statistic of 0.89 and an F1-score of 0.80 followed by EBM and TAN with C-statistics of 0.87 and 0.83, respectively; LR and BN had similar C-statistics of 0.80. Significant factors associated with stroke included atrial fibrillation (AF), hypertension (HT), antiplatelets, HDL, and age. AF, HT, and antihypertensive medication were common significant factors across most models, with AF being the strongest factor in LR, XGBoost, BN, and TAN models. Conclusions: Our study developed stroke prediction models to identify crucial predictive factors such as AF, HT, or systolic blood pressure or antihypertensive medication, anticoagulant medication, HDL, age, and statin use in high-risk patients. The explainable XGBoost was the best model in predicting stroke risk, followed by EBM. 2023-08-29T18:01:46Z 2023-08-29T18:01:46Z 2023-01-01 Article JMIR Cardio Vol.7 (2023) 10.2196/47736 25611011 2-s2.0-85168012091 https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/88951 SCOPUS
institution Mahidol University
building Mahidol University Library
continent Asia
country Thailand
Thailand
content_provider Mahidol University Library
collection Mahidol University Institutional Repository
topic Medicine
spellingShingle Medicine
Lolak S.
Comparing Explainable Machine Learning Approaches With Traditional Statistical Methods for Evaluating Stroke Risk Models: Retrospective Cohort Study
description Background: Stroke has multiple modifiable and nonmodifiable risk factors and represents a leading cause of death globally. Understanding the complex interplay of stroke risk factors is thus not only a scientific necessity but a critical step toward improving global health outcomes. Objective: We aim to assess the performance of explainable machine learning models in predicting stroke risk factors using real-world cohort data by comparing explainable machine learning models with conventional statistical methods. Methods: This retrospective cohort included high-risk patients from Ramathibodi Hospital in Thailand between January 2010 and December 2020. We compared the performance and explainability of logistic regression (LR), Cox proportional hazard, Bayesian network (BN), tree-augmented Naïve Bayes (TAN), extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), and explainable boosting machine (EBM) models. We used multiple imputation by chained equations for missing data and discretized continuous variables as needed. Models were evaluated using C-statistics and F1-scores. Results: Out of 275,247 high-risk patients, 9659 (3.5%) experienced a stroke. XGBoost demonstrated the highest performance with a C-statistic of 0.89 and an F1-score of 0.80 followed by EBM and TAN with C-statistics of 0.87 and 0.83, respectively; LR and BN had similar C-statistics of 0.80. Significant factors associated with stroke included atrial fibrillation (AF), hypertension (HT), antiplatelets, HDL, and age. AF, HT, and antihypertensive medication were common significant factors across most models, with AF being the strongest factor in LR, XGBoost, BN, and TAN models. Conclusions: Our study developed stroke prediction models to identify crucial predictive factors such as AF, HT, or systolic blood pressure or antihypertensive medication, anticoagulant medication, HDL, age, and statin use in high-risk patients. The explainable XGBoost was the best model in predicting stroke risk, followed by EBM.
author2 Mahidol University
author_facet Mahidol University
Lolak S.
format Article
author Lolak S.
author_sort Lolak S.
title Comparing Explainable Machine Learning Approaches With Traditional Statistical Methods for Evaluating Stroke Risk Models: Retrospective Cohort Study
title_short Comparing Explainable Machine Learning Approaches With Traditional Statistical Methods for Evaluating Stroke Risk Models: Retrospective Cohort Study
title_full Comparing Explainable Machine Learning Approaches With Traditional Statistical Methods for Evaluating Stroke Risk Models: Retrospective Cohort Study
title_fullStr Comparing Explainable Machine Learning Approaches With Traditional Statistical Methods for Evaluating Stroke Risk Models: Retrospective Cohort Study
title_full_unstemmed Comparing Explainable Machine Learning Approaches With Traditional Statistical Methods for Evaluating Stroke Risk Models: Retrospective Cohort Study
title_sort comparing explainable machine learning approaches with traditional statistical methods for evaluating stroke risk models: retrospective cohort study
publishDate 2023
url https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/88951
_version_ 1781415027816792064