Comparison of dimensional accuracy of 3D printing model for clear aligner among various orientation types and hollow types

Purpose: The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of printing protocol focusing upon the accuracy of 3D-printed dental models. Materials and Methods: In total, 6 groups of 10 identical maxillary dental models (Formlabs dental model resin) were produced with a stereolithography (SLA)...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Tongkitcharoen N.
Other Authors: Mahidol University
Format: Article
Published: 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/90169
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Mahidol University
id th-mahidol.90169
record_format dspace
spelling th-mahidol.901692023-09-24T01:01:22Z Comparison of dimensional accuracy of 3D printing model for clear aligner among various orientation types and hollow types Tongkitcharoen N. Mahidol University Dentistry Purpose: The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of printing protocol focusing upon the accuracy of 3D-printed dental models. Materials and Methods: In total, 6 groups of 10 identical maxillary dental models (Formlabs dental model resin) were produced with a stereolithography (SLA)-based 3D printer using 6 printing protocols, Group 1: Hollow/Horizontal (HH), Group 2: Hollow/Oblique (HO), Group 3: Hollow/Vertical (HV), Group 4: Non-hollow/Horizontal (NHH), Group 5: Non-hollow/Oblique (NHO) and Group 6: Non-hollow/Vertical (NHV). Deviation analysis (GOM Inspect) using the best-fit algorithm was conducted to assess accuracy. Trueness and precision of 5 tooth types which were further classified by 3 surface points on anterior teeth and 5 surface points on posterior teeth, were calculated. Thereafter, Kruskal–Wallis was conducted to determine if there were any differences in trueness/precision among the 6 printing protocols. Results: Accuracy of clear aligner models showed significant differences (p <.05) among the 6 printing protocols. Majority of values were within clinically acceptable limits (<0.2 mm) except for first molars and second molars. HV showed significant worst accuracy while NHH was the best printing protocol. Other groups (HH/NHV/HO/NHO) were ranked in middle. Inaccuracy was varied depending on tooth type and surface points. Second molars showed greatest defects at significant level in all printing groups. Color surface maps of 3D model superimposition demonstrated non-uniform deviations. Conclusions: The printing protocols with differences in hollow types and printing orientations can significantly affect the dimensional accuracy of 3D printed models for clear aligner. Overall deviations showed location-specific deviations. 2023-09-23T18:01:22Z 2023-09-23T18:01:22Z 2023-01-01 Article Clinical and Investigative Orthodontics (2023) 10.1080/27705781.2023.2251191 2770579X 27705781 2-s2.0-85169543337 https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/90169 SCOPUS
institution Mahidol University
building Mahidol University Library
continent Asia
country Thailand
Thailand
content_provider Mahidol University Library
collection Mahidol University Institutional Repository
topic Dentistry
spellingShingle Dentistry
Tongkitcharoen N.
Comparison of dimensional accuracy of 3D printing model for clear aligner among various orientation types and hollow types
description Purpose: The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of printing protocol focusing upon the accuracy of 3D-printed dental models. Materials and Methods: In total, 6 groups of 10 identical maxillary dental models (Formlabs dental model resin) were produced with a stereolithography (SLA)-based 3D printer using 6 printing protocols, Group 1: Hollow/Horizontal (HH), Group 2: Hollow/Oblique (HO), Group 3: Hollow/Vertical (HV), Group 4: Non-hollow/Horizontal (NHH), Group 5: Non-hollow/Oblique (NHO) and Group 6: Non-hollow/Vertical (NHV). Deviation analysis (GOM Inspect) using the best-fit algorithm was conducted to assess accuracy. Trueness and precision of 5 tooth types which were further classified by 3 surface points on anterior teeth and 5 surface points on posterior teeth, were calculated. Thereafter, Kruskal–Wallis was conducted to determine if there were any differences in trueness/precision among the 6 printing protocols. Results: Accuracy of clear aligner models showed significant differences (p <.05) among the 6 printing protocols. Majority of values were within clinically acceptable limits (<0.2 mm) except for first molars and second molars. HV showed significant worst accuracy while NHH was the best printing protocol. Other groups (HH/NHV/HO/NHO) were ranked in middle. Inaccuracy was varied depending on tooth type and surface points. Second molars showed greatest defects at significant level in all printing groups. Color surface maps of 3D model superimposition demonstrated non-uniform deviations. Conclusions: The printing protocols with differences in hollow types and printing orientations can significantly affect the dimensional accuracy of 3D printed models for clear aligner. Overall deviations showed location-specific deviations.
author2 Mahidol University
author_facet Mahidol University
Tongkitcharoen N.
format Article
author Tongkitcharoen N.
author_sort Tongkitcharoen N.
title Comparison of dimensional accuracy of 3D printing model for clear aligner among various orientation types and hollow types
title_short Comparison of dimensional accuracy of 3D printing model for clear aligner among various orientation types and hollow types
title_full Comparison of dimensional accuracy of 3D printing model for clear aligner among various orientation types and hollow types
title_fullStr Comparison of dimensional accuracy of 3D printing model for clear aligner among various orientation types and hollow types
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of dimensional accuracy of 3D printing model for clear aligner among various orientation types and hollow types
title_sort comparison of dimensional accuracy of 3d printing model for clear aligner among various orientation types and hollow types
publishDate 2023
url https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/90169
_version_ 1781414312362901504