#TITLE_ALTERNATIVE#

Site survey was conducted mainly to determine the location of seabed hazards in the offshore oil exploration platform area. One of the major activities in the site survey is bathymetric survey. Bathymetric survey as a method of depth depiction of the ocean floor can be done either using a Multibeam...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: SATYADHIRA MADALILA (NIM 15108047); Pembimbing: Dr. Ir. Eka Djunarsjah, MT. dan Ir. Samsul Bach, MADE
Format: Final Project
Language:Indonesia
Online Access:https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/14291
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Institut Teknologi Bandung
Language: Indonesia
id id-itb.:14291
spelling id-itb.:142912017-10-09T10:51:07Z#TITLE_ALTERNATIVE# SATYADHIRA MADALILA (NIM 15108047); Pembimbing: Dr. Ir. Eka Djunarsjah, MT. dan Ir. Samsul Bach, MADE Indonesia Final Project INSTITUT TEKNOLOGI BANDUNG https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/14291 Site survey was conducted mainly to determine the location of seabed hazards in the offshore oil exploration platform area. One of the major activities in the site survey is bathymetric survey. Bathymetric survey as a method of depth depiction of the ocean floor can be done either using a Multibeam Echosounder (MBES) or Singlebeam Echosounder (SBES). Both methods were processed into 2 and 3-dimensional visualization using QINSy 2008, and then compared to one another for their effectiveness in providing depth data for a survey sample area located on Bawean Area, East Java. Because SBES has no visual coverage on the sample area, so the SBES depth data were combined with the visual data from the Side Scan Sonar (SSS) using the Global Mapper v.11. Both survey sample areas will undertake an examination about their effectiveness in object detection capability, time effectiveness, and a review of its operational costs. From the analysis results, it can be concluded that the MBES has the ability to give a more precision coordinate, and a better time effectivity than the SBES-SSS. For the operating cost, SBES-SSS was far better than the MBES. Technically, MBES is the most appropriate tool for offshore oil exploration rig site survey. However, the operational cost of MBES method requires a much larger amount of money, so if the site survey’s technical specification could be performed by SBES-SSS, the survey should be done by the cheaper SBES-SSS combination. text
institution Institut Teknologi Bandung
building Institut Teknologi Bandung Library
continent Asia
country Indonesia
Indonesia
content_provider Institut Teknologi Bandung
collection Digital ITB
language Indonesia
description Site survey was conducted mainly to determine the location of seabed hazards in the offshore oil exploration platform area. One of the major activities in the site survey is bathymetric survey. Bathymetric survey as a method of depth depiction of the ocean floor can be done either using a Multibeam Echosounder (MBES) or Singlebeam Echosounder (SBES). Both methods were processed into 2 and 3-dimensional visualization using QINSy 2008, and then compared to one another for their effectiveness in providing depth data for a survey sample area located on Bawean Area, East Java. Because SBES has no visual coverage on the sample area, so the SBES depth data were combined with the visual data from the Side Scan Sonar (SSS) using the Global Mapper v.11. Both survey sample areas will undertake an examination about their effectiveness in object detection capability, time effectiveness, and a review of its operational costs. From the analysis results, it can be concluded that the MBES has the ability to give a more precision coordinate, and a better time effectivity than the SBES-SSS. For the operating cost, SBES-SSS was far better than the MBES. Technically, MBES is the most appropriate tool for offshore oil exploration rig site survey. However, the operational cost of MBES method requires a much larger amount of money, so if the site survey’s technical specification could be performed by SBES-SSS, the survey should be done by the cheaper SBES-SSS combination.
format Final Project
author SATYADHIRA MADALILA (NIM 15108047); Pembimbing: Dr. Ir. Eka Djunarsjah, MT. dan Ir. Samsul Bach, MADE
spellingShingle SATYADHIRA MADALILA (NIM 15108047); Pembimbing: Dr. Ir. Eka Djunarsjah, MT. dan Ir. Samsul Bach, MADE
#TITLE_ALTERNATIVE#
author_facet SATYADHIRA MADALILA (NIM 15108047); Pembimbing: Dr. Ir. Eka Djunarsjah, MT. dan Ir. Samsul Bach, MADE
author_sort SATYADHIRA MADALILA (NIM 15108047); Pembimbing: Dr. Ir. Eka Djunarsjah, MT. dan Ir. Samsul Bach, MADE
title #TITLE_ALTERNATIVE#
title_short #TITLE_ALTERNATIVE#
title_full #TITLE_ALTERNATIVE#
title_fullStr #TITLE_ALTERNATIVE#
title_full_unstemmed #TITLE_ALTERNATIVE#
title_sort #title_alternative#
url https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/14291
_version_ 1820737172949434368