MODIFICATION OF TIN DREDGER PONTON FOR 50 METERS DEPTH

The function of a dredger is to block, lift and move material from the layers that form a crust on the seafloor. As a case study for this Final Assignment, a company wants to modify it’s tin dredger that is operates in the lake in order to operate in the offshore with additional depth of dredge f...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: NOELANDRI SILITONGA (NIM : 13107023); Dosen Pembimbing : Rachman Setiawan, ST, M.Sc.,Ph.D., ABEDNEGO
Format: Final Project
Language:Indonesia
Online Access:https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/14603
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Institut Teknologi Bandung
Language: Indonesia
id id-itb.:14603
spelling id-itb.:146032017-09-27T10:40:54ZMODIFICATION OF TIN DREDGER PONTON FOR 50 METERS DEPTH NOELANDRI SILITONGA (NIM : 13107023); Dosen Pembimbing : Rachman Setiawan, ST, M.Sc.,Ph.D., ABEDNEGO Indonesia Final Project INSTITUT TEKNOLOGI BANDUNG https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/14603 The function of a dredger is to block, lift and move material from the layers that form a crust on the seafloor. As a case study for this Final Assignment, a company wants to modify it’s tin dredger that is operates in the lake in order to operate in the offshore with additional depth of dredge from 41 meters to 50 meters. As one consequence of these modifications, necessary modifications to the pontoon design and placement of components (layout) to be used in those dredgers. The aspects of this modification are specified geometry of the pontoon and stability analysis of the dredger. The first step of this modification is to define the geometry of the new pontoon and designed using Maxsurf. Then do the placement location of the various components of the dredger. The final step is an analysis of <br /> <br /> <br /> stability by using Hydromax. Two alternative that meet the criteria for design modification to these dredger were obtained. On the first pontoon design, the width of the front part of the pontoon is smaller than the back. The advantages of the first alternative is cost effective because it does not require much modification. In the second pontoon design, pontoon width at the front is the same as of the back. The advantage of the second alternative is in the ladder down condition (52o) angle trim = 0o, GZ = 5334,5 mm, GMt = 38142,106 mm, heel angle = 12,8o, and freeboard are above 1m for the fourth corner point, causing the second pontoon alternative is better than the first design. text
institution Institut Teknologi Bandung
building Institut Teknologi Bandung Library
continent Asia
country Indonesia
Indonesia
content_provider Institut Teknologi Bandung
collection Digital ITB
language Indonesia
description The function of a dredger is to block, lift and move material from the layers that form a crust on the seafloor. As a case study for this Final Assignment, a company wants to modify it’s tin dredger that is operates in the lake in order to operate in the offshore with additional depth of dredge from 41 meters to 50 meters. As one consequence of these modifications, necessary modifications to the pontoon design and placement of components (layout) to be used in those dredgers. The aspects of this modification are specified geometry of the pontoon and stability analysis of the dredger. The first step of this modification is to define the geometry of the new pontoon and designed using Maxsurf. Then do the placement location of the various components of the dredger. The final step is an analysis of <br /> <br /> <br /> stability by using Hydromax. Two alternative that meet the criteria for design modification to these dredger were obtained. On the first pontoon design, the width of the front part of the pontoon is smaller than the back. The advantages of the first alternative is cost effective because it does not require much modification. In the second pontoon design, pontoon width at the front is the same as of the back. The advantage of the second alternative is in the ladder down condition (52o) angle trim = 0o, GZ = 5334,5 mm, GMt = 38142,106 mm, heel angle = 12,8o, and freeboard are above 1m for the fourth corner point, causing the second pontoon alternative is better than the first design.
format Final Project
author NOELANDRI SILITONGA (NIM : 13107023); Dosen Pembimbing : Rachman Setiawan, ST, M.Sc.,Ph.D., ABEDNEGO
spellingShingle NOELANDRI SILITONGA (NIM : 13107023); Dosen Pembimbing : Rachman Setiawan, ST, M.Sc.,Ph.D., ABEDNEGO
MODIFICATION OF TIN DREDGER PONTON FOR 50 METERS DEPTH
author_facet NOELANDRI SILITONGA (NIM : 13107023); Dosen Pembimbing : Rachman Setiawan, ST, M.Sc.,Ph.D., ABEDNEGO
author_sort NOELANDRI SILITONGA (NIM : 13107023); Dosen Pembimbing : Rachman Setiawan, ST, M.Sc.,Ph.D., ABEDNEGO
title MODIFICATION OF TIN DREDGER PONTON FOR 50 METERS DEPTH
title_short MODIFICATION OF TIN DREDGER PONTON FOR 50 METERS DEPTH
title_full MODIFICATION OF TIN DREDGER PONTON FOR 50 METERS DEPTH
title_fullStr MODIFICATION OF TIN DREDGER PONTON FOR 50 METERS DEPTH
title_full_unstemmed MODIFICATION OF TIN DREDGER PONTON FOR 50 METERS DEPTH
title_sort modification of tin dredger ponton for 50 meters depth
url https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/14603
_version_ 1820737265908842496