PROBLEM-SOLVING AND DECISION-MAKING FRAMEWORK TO IMPROVE THE PERFORMANCE OFTECHNICAL ESCALATION MANAGERS AT PEGASUS TECHNOLOGIES ENTERPRISE
There has been ongoing concerns on the Technical Escalation Management organization’s <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> performance as indicated from two key metrics called “Average Age” and “Time to Resolve”. These <br /> <br /> &...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Theses |
Language: | Indonesia |
Online Access: | https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/20954 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Institut Teknologi Bandung |
Language: | Indonesia |
id |
id-itb.:20954 |
---|---|
spelling |
id-itb.:209542017-09-27T15:31:19ZPROBLEM-SOLVING AND DECISION-MAKING FRAMEWORK TO IMPROVE THE PERFORMANCE OFTECHNICAL ESCALATION MANAGERS AT PEGASUS TECHNOLOGIES ENTERPRISE HUSEN SUMANTORO (NIM 29115446), ALI Indonesia Theses INSTITUT TEKNOLOGI BANDUNG https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/20954 There has been ongoing concerns on the Technical Escalation Management organization’s <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> performance as indicated from two key metrics called “Average Age” and “Time to Resolve”. These <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> two metrics measure how long it takes for Technical Escalation Managers to work on and resolve <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> Customer’s escalated issues. It is observed that Technical Escalation Managers in Asia Pacific and <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> Japan region could not meet the targeted baseline and there has not been any significant <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> improvement of these two metrics over the past 30 months. A cause-and-effect diagrams reveal <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> major causes which are impacting the performance issue – People, Process, Product Quality and <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> External Factors. This study will investigate and develop solution based on Process factor. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> The methodology being used in the study is primarily qualitative research, through observations, <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> analysis of documentations, review of existing processes and literature studies. The Author has also <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> collected and reviewed statistical performance data from the organization’s operational team. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> Furthermore, the author has also performed interviews with Technical Escalation Managers from <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> Asia Pacific region using surveys and open-ended questions. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> A fundamental part of every Technical Escalation Manager’s role is the ability to drive the problemsolving <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> process <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> and making <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> good <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> decisions <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> in <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> timely <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> manner. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> The <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> study <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> reveals <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> that <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> there <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> has <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> been <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> little, <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> if <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> any, <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> formal <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> evaluation, <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> enquiry <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> and/or <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> study <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> on <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> developing <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> a <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> framework <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> of <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> problem-solving <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> and <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> decision-making <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> in <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> the <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> Technical <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> Escalation <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> Management <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> organization. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> The <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> lack <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> of <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> framework <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> and <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> common approach is impacting the organization’s and individual’s performance to manage <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> Customer’s escalated problems consistently. This study aims to propose a consistent and innovative <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> framework for problem-solving and decision-making, in order to support Technical Escalation <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> Managers in the organization to resolve complex customers’ problem more effectively and to make <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> sound decisions. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> The proposed framework is developed based on the current norms and methods, behavior and <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> combined with the Kepner-Tregoe framework. It consists of 3 phases, escalation triage, formal <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> escalation and escalation closure, where each phase consists of multiple iterative activities. The <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> proposed framework will give Technical Escalation Managers with a structured, organized and <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> consistent approach in reviewing an escalation request, managing the formal escalation, making a <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> good decision and performing problem-solving activities. text |
institution |
Institut Teknologi Bandung |
building |
Institut Teknologi Bandung Library |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Indonesia Indonesia |
content_provider |
Institut Teknologi Bandung |
collection |
Digital ITB |
language |
Indonesia |
format |
Theses |
author |
HUSEN SUMANTORO (NIM 29115446), ALI |
spellingShingle |
HUSEN SUMANTORO (NIM 29115446), ALI PROBLEM-SOLVING AND DECISION-MAKING FRAMEWORK TO IMPROVE THE PERFORMANCE OFTECHNICAL ESCALATION MANAGERS AT PEGASUS TECHNOLOGIES ENTERPRISE |
author_facet |
HUSEN SUMANTORO (NIM 29115446), ALI |
author_sort |
HUSEN SUMANTORO (NIM 29115446), ALI |
title |
PROBLEM-SOLVING AND DECISION-MAKING FRAMEWORK TO IMPROVE THE PERFORMANCE OFTECHNICAL ESCALATION MANAGERS AT PEGASUS TECHNOLOGIES ENTERPRISE |
title_short |
PROBLEM-SOLVING AND DECISION-MAKING FRAMEWORK TO IMPROVE THE PERFORMANCE OFTECHNICAL ESCALATION MANAGERS AT PEGASUS TECHNOLOGIES ENTERPRISE |
title_full |
PROBLEM-SOLVING AND DECISION-MAKING FRAMEWORK TO IMPROVE THE PERFORMANCE OFTECHNICAL ESCALATION MANAGERS AT PEGASUS TECHNOLOGIES ENTERPRISE |
title_fullStr |
PROBLEM-SOLVING AND DECISION-MAKING FRAMEWORK TO IMPROVE THE PERFORMANCE OFTECHNICAL ESCALATION MANAGERS AT PEGASUS TECHNOLOGIES ENTERPRISE |
title_full_unstemmed |
PROBLEM-SOLVING AND DECISION-MAKING FRAMEWORK TO IMPROVE THE PERFORMANCE OFTECHNICAL ESCALATION MANAGERS AT PEGASUS TECHNOLOGIES ENTERPRISE |
title_sort |
problem-solving and decision-making framework to improve the performance oftechnical escalation managers at pegasus technologies enterprise |
url |
https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/20954 |
_version_ |
1822920014463762432 |
description |
There has been ongoing concerns on the Technical Escalation Management organization’s <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
performance as indicated from two key metrics called “Average Age” and “Time to Resolve”. These <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
two metrics measure how long it takes for Technical Escalation Managers to work on and resolve <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Customer’s escalated issues. It is observed that Technical Escalation Managers in Asia Pacific and <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Japan region could not meet the targeted baseline and there has not been any significant <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
improvement of these two metrics over the past 30 months. A cause-and-effect diagrams reveal <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
major causes which are impacting the performance issue – People, Process, Product Quality and <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
External Factors. This study will investigate and develop solution based on Process factor. <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
The methodology being used in the study is primarily qualitative research, through observations, <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
analysis of documentations, review of existing processes and literature studies. The Author has also <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
collected and reviewed statistical performance data from the organization’s operational team. <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Furthermore, the author has also performed interviews with Technical Escalation Managers from <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Asia Pacific region using surveys and open-ended questions. <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
A fundamental part of every Technical Escalation Manager’s role is the ability to drive the problemsolving <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
process <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
and making <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
good <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
decisions <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
in <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
timely <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
manner. <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
The <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
study <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
reveals <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
that <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
there <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
has <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
been <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
little, <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
if <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
any, <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
formal <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
evaluation, <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
enquiry <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
and/or <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
study <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
on <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
developing <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
a <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
framework <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
of <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
problem-solving <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
and <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
decision-making <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
in <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
the <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Technical <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Escalation <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Management <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
organization. <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
The <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
lack <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
of <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
framework <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
and <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
common approach is impacting the organization’s and individual’s performance to manage <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Customer’s escalated problems consistently. This study aims to propose a consistent and innovative <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
framework for problem-solving and decision-making, in order to support Technical Escalation <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Managers in the organization to resolve complex customers’ problem more effectively and to make <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
sound decisions. <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
The proposed framework is developed based on the current norms and methods, behavior and <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
combined with the Kepner-Tregoe framework. It consists of 3 phases, escalation triage, formal <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
escalation and escalation closure, where each phase consists of multiple iterative activities. The <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
proposed framework will give Technical Escalation Managers with a structured, organized and <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
consistent approach in reviewing an escalation request, managing the formal escalation, making a <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
good decision and performing problem-solving activities. |