COMPARISON RELATIVE AND ABSOLUTE AMPLITUDE WITH DIP MOVE OUT METHOD AND COMMON REFLECTION SURFACE METHOD

The amplitude of the seismic wave shows an indicator of subsurface reflector. Seismic data with preserved amplitude is required for further seismic studies. Therefore, it is necessary that appropriate seismic data processing is done to generate preserved amplitude seismic data. Aki-Richards equation...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: KHAIRI (NIM : 12308054), HANIFUL
Format: Final Project
Language:Indonesia
Online Access:https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/22351
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Institut Teknologi Bandung
Language: Indonesia
id id-itb.:22351
spelling id-itb.:223512017-10-09T10:31:17ZCOMPARISON RELATIVE AND ABSOLUTE AMPLITUDE WITH DIP MOVE OUT METHOD AND COMMON REFLECTION SURFACE METHOD KHAIRI (NIM : 12308054), HANIFUL Indonesia Final Project INSTITUT TEKNOLOGI BANDUNG https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/22351 The amplitude of the seismic wave shows an indicator of subsurface reflector. Seismic data with preserved amplitude is required for further seismic studies. Therefore, it is necessary that appropriate seismic data processing is done to generate preserved amplitude seismic data. Aki-Richards equation can show reflectors with preserved amplitude in each angle. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> Seismic wave is bandlimited so that the assumption that the reflection in the interface as a point is not appropriate, but as a line in 2D or an area in 3D known as fresnel zone. Fresnel zone is the basic idea of common reflection surface (CRS) method. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> In this study, seismic data processing is done using conventional Dip Moveout (DMO) and Common Reflection Surface (CRS) method to get Pre Stack Time Migration (PSTM) gather that will be followed by AVA analysis. Preserved amplitude evaluation is done by fitting the amplitude variations of seismic data processing result and Aki-Richards calculation. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> AVA analysis using seismic data from CRS method has preserved amplitude better than DMO method. PSTM gather resulted from CRS method shows better reflector continuity and higher signal to noise ratio compared to the results of the DMO method, so it is good input for AVA analysis. text
institution Institut Teknologi Bandung
building Institut Teknologi Bandung Library
continent Asia
country Indonesia
Indonesia
content_provider Institut Teknologi Bandung
collection Digital ITB
language Indonesia
description The amplitude of the seismic wave shows an indicator of subsurface reflector. Seismic data with preserved amplitude is required for further seismic studies. Therefore, it is necessary that appropriate seismic data processing is done to generate preserved amplitude seismic data. Aki-Richards equation can show reflectors with preserved amplitude in each angle. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> Seismic wave is bandlimited so that the assumption that the reflection in the interface as a point is not appropriate, but as a line in 2D or an area in 3D known as fresnel zone. Fresnel zone is the basic idea of common reflection surface (CRS) method. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> In this study, seismic data processing is done using conventional Dip Moveout (DMO) and Common Reflection Surface (CRS) method to get Pre Stack Time Migration (PSTM) gather that will be followed by AVA analysis. Preserved amplitude evaluation is done by fitting the amplitude variations of seismic data processing result and Aki-Richards calculation. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> AVA analysis using seismic data from CRS method has preserved amplitude better than DMO method. PSTM gather resulted from CRS method shows better reflector continuity and higher signal to noise ratio compared to the results of the DMO method, so it is good input for AVA analysis.
format Final Project
author KHAIRI (NIM : 12308054), HANIFUL
spellingShingle KHAIRI (NIM : 12308054), HANIFUL
COMPARISON RELATIVE AND ABSOLUTE AMPLITUDE WITH DIP MOVE OUT METHOD AND COMMON REFLECTION SURFACE METHOD
author_facet KHAIRI (NIM : 12308054), HANIFUL
author_sort KHAIRI (NIM : 12308054), HANIFUL
title COMPARISON RELATIVE AND ABSOLUTE AMPLITUDE WITH DIP MOVE OUT METHOD AND COMMON REFLECTION SURFACE METHOD
title_short COMPARISON RELATIVE AND ABSOLUTE AMPLITUDE WITH DIP MOVE OUT METHOD AND COMMON REFLECTION SURFACE METHOD
title_full COMPARISON RELATIVE AND ABSOLUTE AMPLITUDE WITH DIP MOVE OUT METHOD AND COMMON REFLECTION SURFACE METHOD
title_fullStr COMPARISON RELATIVE AND ABSOLUTE AMPLITUDE WITH DIP MOVE OUT METHOD AND COMMON REFLECTION SURFACE METHOD
title_full_unstemmed COMPARISON RELATIVE AND ABSOLUTE AMPLITUDE WITH DIP MOVE OUT METHOD AND COMMON REFLECTION SURFACE METHOD
title_sort comparison relative and absolute amplitude with dip move out method and common reflection surface method
url https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/22351
_version_ 1821120744750317568