IMPLEMENTING INDONESIẢ̉S MINING LAW DURING THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE KUCING LIAR MINE PT FREEPORT INDONESIA IN PAPUA PROVINCE
Mining is a high-risk business since it usually requires high development costs with so many <br /> <br /> uncertainties, especially associated with the volatility of commodity prices. It is therefore <br /> <br /> critical for the mining industry to have solid and firm regul...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Theses |
Language: | Indonesia |
Online Access: | https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/22659 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Institut Teknologi Bandung |
Language: | Indonesia |
Summary: | Mining is a high-risk business since it usually requires high development costs with so many <br />
<br />
uncertainties, especially associated with the volatility of commodity prices. It is therefore <br />
<br />
critical for the mining industry to have solid and firm regulations in order to better assess profit <br />
<br />
expectations for shareholders. <br />
<br />
The implementation of the Indonesian Mining Law will have major impact on PT Freeport <br />
<br />
Indonesia (PTFI). The law requires PTFI to change its mining permit from Contract of Work <br />
<br />
(COW) to be Special Mining Permit (IUPK). There are still outstanding uncertainties regarding <br />
<br />
the tax and royalty scheme that will be applied to PTFI. <br />
<br />
This project evaluates the impact of mining permit transformation on the Development Plan of <br />
<br />
PTFI’s Kucing Liar Block Cave Mine in Papua Province using a Discount Cash Flow analysis <br />
<br />
supported by the Monte Carlo method to evaluate the risk. A commodity price simulation <br />
<br />
obtained from modeling using the Geometric Brownian motion (GBM) approach is used as <br />
<br />
input to calculate the predicted project cash flow. The analysis suggests that with current taxes <br />
<br />
and royalty rate, the permit change almost has no considerable impact to financial performance <br />
<br />
as Payback Period, IRR and NVP from both IUPK and COW are very similar. <br />
<br />
However, sensitivity analysis indicates that a change in tax and royalty rates will be the 3 <br />
<br />
most <br />
<br />
important aspect that could impact the mining project’s revenue after commodity price <br />
<br />
fluctuations and capital cost. Furthermore, the Monte Carlo analysis also suggests that IUPK <br />
<br />
permit incurs more risk than the COW arrangement. Despite the added risk of changing to the <br />
<br />
IUPK, some opportunities exist for business performance improvement to offset this risk. <br />
<br />
Considered in this study is an improvement of gold recovery in processing plant. A reduction <br />
<br />
in taxes (rather than the generally expected increase) is also considered in this report. |
---|