ANALYSIS OF SAFETY CLIMATE AS A SAFETY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM IMPROVEMENT (CASE STUDY : WORKSHOP X, PT. DIRGANTARA INDONESIA)
<p align="justify">Increasing number of air passengers have significantly occurred in has three years in Indonesia. The number of air passengers reached about 50 million people in 2013. This was in line with the increase in aircraft bookings in 2013, which increased almost by 10% fro...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Theses |
| Language: | Indonesia |
| Online Access: | https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/28889 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Institution: | Institut Teknologi Bandung |
| Language: | Indonesia |
| Summary: | <p align="justify">Increasing number of air passengers have significantly occurred in has three years in Indonesia. The number of air passengers reached about 50 million people in 2013. This was in line with the increase in aircraft bookings in 2013, which increased almost by 10% from the previous year. Increased perceived by PT. DI, as entrusted aircraft components making company. According the intensity of the work will increase and the possibility of increasing the number of <br />
accidents. Number of accidents in 2014 (January-June) reached 14 cases in PT. DI, Higher when compared to the last three years. To determine the right approach an analysis of the cases of work accidents using fishbone diagrams was conducted. The results showed that the cause of accident of workers, materials, and methods. Therefore, it is necessary to increase the commitment and precautions in preventif similar accident. Safety climate can describe the commitment of management and workers in terms of safety. The study using NOSACQ50 questionnaires to obtain safety climate was formed, where the value was in the average of 3.01 (slightly good) which means requiring little improvement. Questionnaire was statistically analyzed using t – test and Pearson correlation test. Risk management process starts from the hazards identification until measurements control against risks. This study uses FMEA and LOPA for hazard identification and risk assessment. The highest risk value of the process in the workshop X based FMEA were inhaling chemical fumes (30), inhaling paint fumes and solvents (30), fire (24), and heat (20). Risk tolerance value of all scenarios using LOPA still below standard (10<sup>-4</sup>– 10<sup>-3</sup>), showed that the protective layer of safety is quite safe.<p align="justify"> |
|---|