MULTI ACTOR MULTI CRITERIA ANALYSIS (MAMCA) APPROACH IN SELECTION OF ALTERNATIVE DEVELOPMENT OF TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURE: CASE STUDY SELECTION OF TOLL ROAD TO PATIMBAN PORT, WEST JAWA

• Main Author: Rosadi, Aditya
• Format: Theses
• Language: Indonesia
• Subjects: Transportasi ; transportasi darat
• Online Access: https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/33038
• Institution: Institut Teknologi Bandung

The construction of Patimban Port in West Java Province has the potential to increase the flow of exported and imported goods in the northern part of West Java. The increase in the flow of goods will have an impact on increasing the flow of goods transport vehicles both from and to Patimban port. At several crossing points leading to and from Patimban port, the V / C road ratio is close to 0.8 which indicates the density of traffic flow, while the speed of the flow of goods must be maintained in order to create a positive economic impact from the presence of Patimban port. The government has included the construction of the Subang-Patimban toll road in the national spatial and regional plans. The presence of initiation of toll road construction from investors as an alternative to national roads needs to be followed up in anticipation of the economic impacts that arise. This research analyzes stakeholders and the criteria they expect in the selection of alternative routes to the Patimban port toll. Stakeholdes are obtained from the elaboration of the main tasks and functions of legislation, those who need and use the transportation infrastructure and are directly affected by the construction of toll road access. The Multi Actor Multi Criteria Analysis (MAMCA) methodology used aims to evaluate differences in criteria between stakeholders from the alternative criteria given, shows them explicitly and allows consideration of conflicting stakeholder goals and helps identify synergies and disagreements between various stakeholder groups. The differences in criteria and alternative toll road selection selected for each stakeholder can illustrate the level of importance of each. The selection of selected alternatives for all stakeholders uses two calculation methods, first the same weighting for all stakeholders and the weighting the number of criteria that are considered by stakeholders in determining the alternative selected tract. The results of the selected alternative calculation for stakeholders with scenario I obtained an alternative toll road III as a priority with a value of 0.358 while scenario II found an alternative toll road I as the best choice with a value of 0.386.