VALIDASI METODE UJI PENETAPAN AKTIVITAS VITAMIN B12 SECARA MIKROBIOLOGI MENGGUNAKAN LACTOBACILLUS ACIDOPHILUS
Vitamin B12 or cobalamin is a complex water-soluble vitamin compound that is essential in metabolic processes in the human body, including DNA synthesis, energy formation, formation of red blood cell, and nervous system regulation. There are various test methods to quantitatively determine the amo...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Final Project |
Language: | Indonesia |
Online Access: | https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/43940 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Institut Teknologi Bandung |
Language: | Indonesia |
Summary: | Vitamin B12 or cobalamin is a complex water-soluble vitamin compound that is essential in metabolic
processes in the human body, including DNA synthesis, energy formation, formation of red blood cell, and
nervous system regulation. There are various test methods to quantitatively determine the amount of
vitamin B12 in a sample. One of the methods that may be used is microbiological method that utilizes the
growth parameter of microorganism as measurement of vitamin B12 activity in a sample. Microorganism
that is used is chemo-organotrophic microorganism, which is a microorganism that requires extrinsic
nutrition for their growth. Microbiological method that is written in Farmakope Indonesia 5
th
edition uses
Lactobacillus leichmanii as test microorganism, while this study uses Lactobacillus acidophilus as test
microorganism. Lactobacillus acidophilus is one of microorganisms that has chemo-organotrophic
properties, so that it may be used as alternatives for determining the activity of vitamin B12. This study
aimed to validate the microbiological method of determining cyanocobalamin activity using Lactobacillus
acidophilus ATCC 4356. The results of this study showed standard curve linearity with a correlation
coefficient of 0,9666, percent recovery ranging from 9.14% to 197.95%, and standard deviation ranging
from 0.167% to 63.57%. These results indicated that the validation parameter values obtained did not
fulfill the acceptability requirements of a good analytical method validation, thus required further reviews.
|
---|