Analytical Method Establishment for Determination of the Mixture of Dexchlorpheniramine Maleate and Dexamethasone Tablet using High Performance Liquid Chromatography
Background and purpose:The prevalence of allergic diseases is rising dramatically in both developed and developing countries. High prevalence of allergic diseases increased the need of anti-allergy drugs. The combination of dexchlorpheniramine maleate and dexamethasone are one of the drugs prescr...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Theses |
Language: | Indonesia |
Online Access: | https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/45938 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Institut Teknologi Bandung |
Language: | Indonesia |
Summary: | Background and purpose:The prevalence of allergic diseases is rising
dramatically in both developed and developing countries. High prevalence of
allergic diseases increased the need of anti-allergy drugs. The combination of
dexchlorpheniramine maleate and dexamethasone are one of the drugs prescribed
to suppress allergy symptoms. Indonesian specialite drugs 2010 described 15
tablets containing a mixture of the two substances. Dexchlorpheniramine maleate
was an antihistamine that relieved the symptoms of allergic and dexamethasone
was anti-inflammatory drug synergistically as an anti- allergic. The National
Agency of Drug and Food Control (NA-DFC) performed pre-market evaluation
and post-market for public protection. NA-DFC required validated analytical
methods for evaluating the quality of products and quantitating
dexchlorpheniramine maleate and dexamethasone. The validated methode was
AOAC method using HPLC, was expected to be used for routine analysis in NA-
DFC. Method: The analysis was performed on a reversed-phase C18 column,
mobile phase consisted of 7.5 mM monobasic potassium phosphate in methanolwater (60:40) at a constant flow rate 1 mL/menit, temperature column 32
0
C,
injection volume 20 µL with uv detection at 254 nm. In this experiment, standard
stock solution was diluted by methanol-water (50:50) and 10 mL methanol-water
(50:50) was added to sample before being diluted by mobile phase. Results: The
method was validated in term of linearity, precision, accuracy and spesificity. The
response was linear in range of 16 –112 ppm and 4 - 28 ppm for
dexchlorpheniramine maleate (r = 0.9999) and dexamethasone (r = 0.9999)
respectively. Limit of detection 0.23 mg/g respectively for dexchlorpheniramine
maleate and 0.05 mg/g for dexamethasone, limit of quantitation was 0.69 mg/g for
dexchlorpheniramine maleate dan 0.15 mg/g for dexamethasone. The relative
standar deviation values for interday (1.33%; 1.75%; 1.56%), intraday 1.16%
respectively for dexchlorpheniramine maleate and (1.42%; 0.72%; 1.85%)
interday and 0.47% intraday, respectively for dexamethasone. Recoveries range of
sample spiked placebo were from 96.7 to 99.66 % with RSD 1.07% for
dexchlorpheniramine maleate and 92.19 to 96.3 % with RSD 0.83% for
dexamethasone. The established method used has good accuracy and precision.
The established method was applied to determination of dexchlorpheniramine
maleate and dexamethasone tablet in market. The concentration of
dexchlorpheniramine maleate and dexamethasone used validated method were
97.10–102.25 % for dexchlorpheniramine maleate and 91.55–101.69 % for
dexamethasone of the amount list on the label.
|
---|